Suppression Measured from Chinchilla Auditory-Nerve-Fiber Responses Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: Adaptive-Tracking and Systems-Identification Approaches

The compressive nonlinearity of cochlear signal transduction, reflecting outer-hair-cell function, manifests as suppressive spectral interactions; e.g., two-tone suppression. Moreover, for broadband sounds, there are multiple interactions between frequency components. These frequency-dependent nonlinearities are important for neural coding of complex sounds, such as speech. Acoustic-trauma-induced outer-hair-cell damage is associated with loss of nonlinearity, which auditory prostheses attempt to restore with, e.g., “multi-channel dynamic compression” algorithms. Neurophysiological data on suppression in hearing-impaired (HI) mammals are limited. We present data on firing-rate suppression measured in auditory-nerve-fiber responses in a chinchilla model of noise-induced hearing loss, and in normal-hearing (NH) controls at equal sensation level. Hearing-impaired (HI) animals had elevated single-fiber excitatory thresholds (by ~ 20–40 dB), broadened frequency tuning, and reduced-magnitude distortion-product otoacoustic emissions; consistent with mixed inner- and outer-hair-cell pathology. We characterized suppression using two approaches: adaptive tracking of two-tone-suppression threshold (62 NH, and 35 HI fibers), and Wiener-kernel analyses of responses to broadband noise (91 NH, and 148 HI fibers). Suppression-threshold tuning curves showed sensitive low-side suppression for NH and HI animals. High-side suppression thresholds were elevated in HI animals, to the same extent as excitatory thresholds. We factored second-order Wiener-kernels into excitatory and suppressive sub-kernels to quantify the relative strength of suppression. We found a small decrease in suppression in HI fibers, which correlated with broadened tuning. These data will help guide novel amplification strategies, particularly for complex listening situations (e.g., speech in noise), in which current hearing aids struggle to restore intelligibility.

[1]  M. L. Hicks,et al.  Effects of aspirin on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity, two-tone suppression, and growth of masking. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Egbert de Boerb.  The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane . IV . Tone and noise stimulia ) , 2002 .

[3]  Tuning and timing of excitation and inhibition in primary auditory nerve fibers , 2002, Hearing Research.

[4]  N. Cooper,et al.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear mechanics. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  John H. Mills,et al.  Tuning and suppression in auditory nerve fibers of aged gerbils raised in quiet or noise , 1990, Hearing Research.

[6]  Marcel van der Heijden,et al.  The Spatial Buildup of Compression and Suppression in the Mammalian Cochlea , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal Elements of Macaque V1 Receptive Fields , 2005, Neuron.

[8]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  E. Lewis,et al.  Tuning and timing in the gerbil ear: Wiener-kernel analysis , 2002, Hearing Research.

[10]  E. Lewis,et al.  New variations on the derivation of spectro-temporal receptive fields for primary auditory afferent axons , 2004, Hearing Research.

[11]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. I. Threshold shift and characteristic-frequency shift , 1984, Hearing Research.

[12]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered neural characterization. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[13]  Michael G. Heinz,et al.  Envelope Coding in Auditory Nerve Fibers Following Noise-Induced Hearing Loss , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[14]  M. Sachs,et al.  Effects of nonlinearities on speech encoding in the auditory nerve. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  E D Young,et al.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Jayaganesh Swaminathan,et al.  Across-Fiber Coding of Temporal Fine-Structure: Effects of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss on Auditory-Nerve Responses , 2010 .

[17]  M. Ruggero,et al.  Wiener-kernel analysis of responses to noise of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Marcel van der Heijden,et al.  Basilar Membrane Responses to Tones and Tone Complexes: Nonlinear Effects of Stimulus Intensity , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[19]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: Dependence on suppressor frequency and level , 1990, Hearing Research.

[20]  M. Heinz,et al.  Auditory brainstem responses predict auditory nerve fiber thresholds and frequency selectivity in hearing impaired chinchillas , 2011, Hearing Research.

[21]  E. Lewis,et al.  Tuning properties of turtle auditory nerve fibers: Evidence for suppression and adaptation , 2007, Hearing Research.

[22]  C. Daniel Geisler,et al.  Saturation of outer hair cell receptor currents causes two-tone suppression , 1990, Hearing Research.