Measure for the assessment of confidence with manual wheelchair use (WheelCon-M) version 2.1: reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the measurement properties of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale for manual wheelchair users version 2.1 (WheelCon-M 2.1). DESIGN Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS Volunteer sample of 83 community-dwelling, experienced manual wheelchair users. METHODS Participants completed the WheelCon-M 2.1 twice to assess retest reliability. Validity was assessed by evaluating hypothesized relationships between the WheelCon-M 2.1 and relevant variables. Responsiveness was assessed using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest real difference (SRD). RESULTS The median (interquartile range) WheelCon-M 2.1 score was 84.6 (71.3-92.0) of a possible 0-100. The one-week retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.84 with 95% bias-corrected and accelerated confidence intervals of 0.77-0.90. Cronbach's alpha was 0.92. Correlations ranging from rs = -0.19 (p = 0.780) to rs = 0.58 (p < 0.001) were found between the WheelCon-M 2.1 and other relevant outcome measures with all correlations being statistically significant except for age (p = 0.780) and social support (p = 0.057). A statistically significant difference was not found between the sexes (p = 0.140). The SEM and SRM were 5.9 and 16.4, respectively. CONCLUSIONS WheelCon-M 2.1 has high internal consistency, strong retest reliability, and support for concurrent validity, construct validity and responsiveness. This new test holds promise as a clinical and research tool.

[1]  William Howard Beasley,et al.  Bootstrapping to test for nonzero population correlation coefficients using univariate sampling. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[2]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  A Clinical Trial of a Rehabilitation Expert Clinician Versus Usual Care for Providing Manual Wheelchairs , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[3]  S. Wilcox,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Questionnaire in a Diverse Sample of Men and Women , 2005 .

[4]  W. Miller,et al.  Prevalence and Predictors of Need for Seating Intervention and Mobility for Persons in Long-Term Care* , 2008, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[5]  Brian J. Ayotte,et al.  Physical Activity in Middle-aged and Young-old Adults , 2010, Journal of health psychology.

[6]  François Routhier,et al.  Preliminary examination of the relation between participation and confidence in older manual wheelchair users. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Krista L Best,et al.  The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Sample size requirements for reliability studies. , 1987, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  J. Hanley,et al.  The Effect of a Task‐Oriented Walking Intervention on Improving Balance Self‐Efficacy Poststroke: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  Jan Passchier,et al.  Perception of prognostic risk in patients with multiple sclerosis: the relationship with anxiety, depression, and disease-related distress. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  Nynke Smidt,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of the assessment of severity of complaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Shah Ebrahim,et al.  A postal version of the Barthel Index , 1994 .

[13]  R. Allman,et al.  Measuring Life‐Space Mobility in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[14]  Joanne Yip,et al.  Development and content validation of the Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: a mixed-methods study , 2011, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[15]  Krista L Best,et al.  Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Shields,et al.  Use of wheelchairs and other mobility support devices. , 2004, Health reports.

[17]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[18]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[19]  W Ben Mortenson,et al.  Association Between Mobility, Participation, and Wheelchair‐Related Factors in Long‐Term Care Residents Who Use Wheelchairs as Their Primary Means of Mobility , 2012, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  B. Dicianno,et al.  Mobility, Assistive Technology Use, and Social Integration Among Adults with Spina Bifida , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  A J Asbury,et al.  Assessment of preoperative anxiety: comparison of measures in patients awaiting surgery for breast cancer. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[22]  R L Hewer,et al.  Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[23]  Luc Noreau,et al.  Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  Paula W Rushton,et al.  Manual wheelchair skills: objective testing versus subjective questionnaire. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  J. Lisspers,et al.  Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD): some psychometric data for a Swedish sample , 1997, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[26]  L. Portney,et al.  Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice , 2015 .

[27]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[28]  Sheldon Cohen,et al.  Positive Events and Social Supports as Buffers of Life Change Stress , 1983 .

[29]  Heleen Beckerman,et al.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness , 2001, Quality of Life Research.

[30]  C. Hocking.  Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices ∗ , 1999 .

[31]  R. Lee Kirby,et al.  Manual wheelchair skills capacity versus performance. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Reliability of the performance and safety scores of the wheelchair skills test version 4.1 for manual wheelchair users. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[34]  Development of a new scale for perceived self-efficacy in manual wheeled mobility: a pilot study. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[35]  R. Snaith,et al.  The hospital anxiety and depression scale. , 2013, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[36]  M. Steinhardt,et al.  The Development and Validation of the Sense of Support Scale , 2000, Behavioral medicine.

[37]  Elizabeth Domholdt,et al.  Physical Therapy Research: Principles and Applications , 1993 .

[38]  Birgitta Lindmark,et al.  Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.