GenetiKit: a randomized controlled trial to enhance delivery of genetics services by family physicians.

BACKGROUND Patients look to their family physicians (FPs) for credible information and guidance in making informed choices about genetic testing. FPs are challenged by lack of knowledge and the rapid pace of genetic discovery. There is an urgent need for effective interventions to facilitate integration of genetics into family medicine. OBJECTIVE To determine if a multi-faceted knowledge translation intervention would improve skills, including referral decisions, confidence in core genetics competencies and knowledge. METHODS Randomized controlled trial involving FPs in four communities in Ontario, Canada (two urban and two rural). The intervention consisted of an interactive educational workshop, portfolio of practical clinical genetics tools and knowledge service called Gene Messenger. Outcome measures included appropriate genetics referral decisions in response to 10 breast cancer scenarios, decisional difficulty, self-reported confidence in 11 genetics core competencies, 3 knowledge questions and evaluation of intervention components 6 months afterwards. RESULTS Among the one hundred and twenty-five FPs randomized, 80 (64%) completed the study (33 control, 47 intervention). Intervention FPs had significantly higher appropriate referral decision scores [6.4/10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.8-6.9] control, 7.8/10 (95% CI 7.4-8.2) intervention] and overall self-reported confidence on core genetics competencies [37.9/55 (95% CI 35.1-40.7) control, 47.0/55 (95% CI 44.9-49.2) intervention]. Over 90% of FPs wanted to continue receiving Gene Messengers and would recommend them to colleagues. No significant differences were found in decisional difficulty or knowledge. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that a complex educational intervention was able to significantly improve practice intent for clinical genetics scenarios found in primary care, as well as confidence in genetics skills.

[1]  M. Vanier,et al.  A cluster randomized controlled Trial to Evaluate an Ambulatory primary care Management program for patients with dyslipidemia: the TEAM study , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[2]  Fiona Miller,et al.  Genetic education for primary care providers: improving attitudes, knowledge, and confidence. , 2009, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[3]  Newborn ScreeningServices National Coalition for Health Professional Education in Genetics (NCHPEG): Principles of Genetics for Health Professionals , 2009 .

[4]  I. Graham,et al.  Attitude and Knowledge about Genetics and Genetic Testing , 2009, Public Health Genomics.

[5]  Ian Harvey,et al.  A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[6]  'Over-the-counter' genetic testing: what does it really mean for primary care? , 2009, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[7]  David Ponka,et al.  Cryotherapy: minor surgery video series. , 2009, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[8]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Genetics: hereditary hemochromatosis. , 2009, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[9]  John D Potter,et al.  Genetic susceptibility to cancer: the role of polymorphisms in candidate genes. , 2008, JAMA.

[10]  Muin J. Khoury,et al.  Letting the genome out of the bottle--will we get our wish? , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E. Grunfeld,et al.  Genetic Services for Hereditary Breast/Ovarian and Colorectal Cancers – Physicians’ Awareness, Use and Satisfaction , 2008, Public Health Genomics.

[12]  L. Herman Hereditary breast and ovarian cancers. , 2008, JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants.

[13]  B. Psaty,et al.  Personalized medicine in the era of genomics. , 2007, JAMA.

[14]  J. Pirkis,et al.  Recruiting and retaining GPs and patients in intervention studies: the DEPS-GP project as a case study , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[15]  J. Double Genetic Susceptibility , 1993, Cancer Causes & Control.

[16]  S. Straus,et al.  Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[17]  K. Stange,et al.  Clinical genetics issues encountered by family physicians , 2005, Genetics in Medicine.

[18]  W. Meschino,et al.  The Educational Needs and Professional Roles of Canadian Physicians and Nurses regarding Genetic Testing and Adult Onset Hereditary Disease , 2005, Public Health Genomics.

[19]  M. Greene,et al.  Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians , 2005, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[20]  Lidewij Henneman,et al.  Public Experiences, Knowledge and Expectations about Medical Genetics and the Use of Genetic Information , 2004, Public Health Genomics.

[21]  M. Conner,et al.  The Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2004 .

[22]  G. Glendon,et al.  Genetic susceptibility to cancer. Family physicians' experience. , 2003, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[23]  Jeremy M Grimshaw,et al.  Changing physicians' behavior: what works and thoughts on getting more things to work. , 2002, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[24]  N. Qureshi,et al.  The genetics liaison nurse role as a means of educating and supporting primary care professionals. , 2002, Family practice.

[25]  R. Dobson Scientists produce genetically engineered, cloned pigs for xenotransplantation , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  L. Eaton GPs refer too many women for genetic tests , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  J. Mouchawar,et al.  Colorado family physicians' knowledge of hereditary breast cancer and related practice. , 2009, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[28]  J. Emery,et al.  Referral of patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer--GPs' knowledge and expectations. , 2001, Family practice.

[29]  J. Austoker,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial. , 2001, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[30]  R E Pyeritz,et al.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far? , 2001, American journal of medical genetics.

[31]  J. Boyd,et al.  Hereditary breast cancer. , 2001, Current problems in surgery.

[32]  J Emery,et al.  The challenge of integrating genetic medicine into primary care , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Raising concerns about family history of breast cancer in primary care consultations: prospective, population based study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  J. Kievit,et al.  How women with a family history of breast cancer and their general practitioners act on genetic advice in general practice: prospective longitudinal study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  M. Escher,et al.  Primary care physicians' knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer predisposition. , 2000, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  J Austoker,et al.  Computer support for interpreting family histories of breast and ovarian cancer in primary care: comparative study with simulated cases , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  H Campbell,et al.  GPs' views on their role in cancer genetics services and current practice. , 1999, Family practice.

[38]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? , 1999, JAMA.

[39]  J. Austoker,et al.  The 'new genetics' and primary care: GPs' views on their role and their educational needs. , 1999, Family practice.

[40]  J. Emery,et al.  A systematic review of the literature exploring the role of primary care in genetic services. , 1999, Family practice.

[41]  E. Warner,et al.  Hereditary breast cancer. Psychosocial issues and family physicians' role. , 1999, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[42]  M. Suchard,et al.  General practitioners' views on genetic screening for common diseases. , 1999, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[43]  A Hunter,et al.  Physician knowledge and attitudes towards molecular genetic (DNA) testing of their patients , 1998, Clinical genetics.

[44]  S. Plon,et al.  Cancer genetics--survey of primary care physicians' attitudes and practices. , 1997, Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education.

[45]  D G Altman,et al.  Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons , 1995, BMJ.

[46]  R. J. Hayes,et al.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. , 1995, JAMA.

[47]  T. Sangeetha,et al.  Survey of Object Oriented Mining for XML Data , 2011 .

[48]  Doug Brown,et al.  Primary Care Physicians , 2020, Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine.

[49]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[50]  N. Holtzman,et al.  Implications of the human genome initiative for the primary care physician. , 1991, Bioethics.

[51]  C. Zuckermann [Ovarian cancers]. , 1954, Revista espanola de obstetricia y ginecologia.

[52]  J. C. Meakins,et al.  The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada , 1936, Canadian Medical Association journal.