Social Constructivist Approach to Web-Based EFL Learning: Collaboration, Motivation, and Perception on the Use of Google Docs

Introduction Social influence is considered to have a significant impact on academic success (Schunk, 1999; Riese, Samara, & Lillejord, 2012). It postulates that if students are more able to maintain their social relationships with others in school, they are likely to perform better academically than those who are not. In second or foreign language (L2/FL) learning, there has been great interest among L2/FL researchers and educators in how learners interact with one another for knowledge co-construction or the negotiation of meaning in traditional face-to-face settings in order to enhance linguistic knowledge in the target language, e.g., Foster and Ohta (2005), and Dobao (2012; 2014). Thanks to emerging technology or computer use for daily communication, e.g., emails and chats, socialization has inevitably become part of our everyday lives. In particular, the Internet has been one of the most important resources for strengthening students' learning experiences at the tertiary level (Lee & Tsai, 2011; Liu, Lan, & Ho, 2014); it potentially provides genuine communication to foster autonomous learning (McLoughlin & Lee, 2010). Such meaningful communication via the Internet for educational purposes has been widely researched in recent years, as it is believed that it engenders students' meaningful learning experiences and improves their motivation and engagement (Chu & Kennedy, 2011; Hwang, Wang, & Sharples, 2007; Cheng & Chau, 2013; Winke & Goertler, 2008; Cho & Kim, 2013; Razon, Turner, Johnson, Arsal, & Tenenbaum, 2012; Lan, 2014; Lee & Tsai, 2011; Cho & Jonassen, 2009). However, the relationship between motivation and collaborative learning in a specific context has remained under-explored in the conventional classroom setting (Jarvela, Volet, & Jarvenoja, 2010) or in the web- based environment. Taken together, in this study, the main focus is on the impact of online text-based collaboration outside the classroom on the constructs (e.g., motivation and vocabulary gain) by examining the quantitative data of the questionnaire survey and the Google Docs log files. Socially web-based learning in FL Socially web-based tools have been increasingly adopted for L2 or FL learning. As such, online text chats are being utilized for examining modified interaction between less and more capable interlocutors in order for L2/FL development to occur. During a problem-solving task, a learner's non-target linguistic items that often cause misunderstanding or communication difficulty need to be corrected through employing a clarification request or comprehension check. Such corrected items provide the learner with linguistic input that learner may then use it to generate his/her output; it potentially pushes the learners' production (Yilmaz, 2011). In Collentine and Collentine's (2013) study by adopting a corpus approach to examining learners' complex syntactic structures in Spanish in a SCMC setting, their results show that learners are likely to produce the target sentences (nominal clauses) to reply to their expert interlocutors. Their findings suggest that interaction taking place in SCMC can promote leaners' syntactic knowledge in the target language. Supportive of negotiated interaction that leads to L2/FL development, Smith and Renaud (2013) have put it forward that due to network delay time that affords learners to have more time to process input and monitor their output. In their study, they employed eye-tracking technology to explore L2 learners' attention paid to lexical and grammatical features of the corrective feedback provided by their instructors during text chats. The way in which learners fixated on the target items had a great impact on their linguistic knowledge; learners who were likely to notice the linguistic items tended to acquire them. The results of their study suggest that the amount of eye fixation time significantly associated with the posttest scores (e. …

[1]  R. Lyster Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms , 1998 .

[2]  R. C. Gardner Social psychology and second language learning : the role of attitudes and motivation , 1985 .

[3]  Jiyeon Lee Patterns of Interaction and Participation in a Large Online Course: Strategies for Fostering Sustainable Discussion , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[4]  M. Warschauer Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom , 2013, CALICO Journal.

[5]  Qing Ma,et al.  Computer assisted vocabulary learning: Design and evaluation , 2006 .

[6]  Yu-Fen Yang,et al.  Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment , 2011 .

[7]  M. Nyikos,et al.  Constructivist Theory Applied to Collaborative Learning in Teacher Education: In Search of ZPD. , 1997 .

[8]  Susan Stempleski,et al.  World link : developing English fluency , 2005 .

[9]  J. Lantolf,et al.  Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Acquisition , 1995, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[10]  Kim McDonough,et al.  Collaborative Dialogue Between Thai EFL Learners During Self-Access Computer Activities. , 2009 .

[11]  Yu-Ju Lan,et al.  Does Second Life Improve Mandarin Learning by Overseas Chinese Students , 2014 .

[12]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Research on Motivation in Collaborative Learning: Moving Beyond the Cognitive–Situative Divide and Combining Individual and Social Processes , 2010 .

[13]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[14]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[15]  Claire Fiona Kennedy,et al.  In piazza online: exploring the use of wikis with beginner foreign language learners , 2013 .

[16]  Petri Nokelainen,et al.  A shared document-based annotation tool to support learner-centred collaborative learning , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[17]  P. Y. Thomas,et al.  Cloud computing: A potential paradigm for practising the scholarship of teaching and learning , 2011, Electron. Libr..

[18]  J. Chau,et al.  Exploring the relationship between students' self-regulated learning ability and their ePortfolio achievement , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Yucel Yilmaz,et al.  Task Effects on Focus on Form in Synchronous Computer‐Mediated Communication , 2011 .

[20]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Students' perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Moon-Heum Cho,et al.  Students' self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  P. Pintrich Educational Psychology at the Millennium: A Look Back and a Look Forward , 2000 .

[23]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  College students' experience of online argumentation: Conceptions, approaches and the conditions of using question prompts , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[24]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Personalised and Self Regulated Learning in the Web 2.0 Era: International Exemplars of Innovative Pedagogy Using Social Software. , 2010 .

[25]  Zelilha Aydin,et al.  Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing , 2014 .

[26]  Tristan E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of a collaborative annotation method on students' learning and learning-related motivation and affect , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  D. Schunk Social-self interaction and achievement behavior , 1999 .

[28]  Wu-Yuin Hwang,et al.  A study of multimedia annotation of Web-based materials , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Gülcan Erçetin,et al.  Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning , 2014 .

[30]  Nihat Polat,et al.  Anonymity and Motivation in Asynchronous Discussions and L2 Vocabulary Learning. , 2013 .

[31]  Fred Paas,et al.  Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Neomy Storch,et al.  Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections , 2005 .

[33]  E. Atkinson,et al.  Discourse, Power, and Resistance: Challenging the Rhetoric of Contemporary Education , 2003 .

[34]  A. Dobao Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair and small group work , 2014 .

[35]  Hossein Nassaji,et al.  Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs , 2010 .

[36]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[37]  A. Ohta,et al.  Negotiation for Meaning and Peer Assistance in Second Language Classrooms , 2005 .

[38]  YouJin Kim,et al.  The Contribution of Collaborative and Individual Tasks to the Acquisition of L2 Vocabulary , 2008 .

[39]  Senta Goertler,et al.  Did We Forget Someone? Students' Computer Access and Literacy for CALL , 2013 .

[40]  V. John-Steiner,et al.  Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework , 1996 .

[41]  A. Dobao Collaborative Dialogue in Learner–Learner and Learner–Native Speaker Interaction , 2012 .

[42]  Z. Dörnyei Motivation in second and foreign language learning , 1998, Language Teaching.

[43]  Sarah H. J. Liu,et al.  Technology-Enhanced Strategy Use for Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition , 2014 .

[44]  Dawn Bikowski,et al.  COLLABORATIVE WRITING AMONG SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN ACADEMIC WEB-BASED PROJECTS , 2012 .

[45]  Karina Collentine,et al.  9. A corpus approach to studying structural convergence in task-based Spanish L2 interactions , 2013 .

[46]  Claire Renaud,et al.  8. Using eye tracking as a measure of foreign language learners’ noticing of recasts during computer-mediated writing conferences , 2013 .

[47]  B. Zimmerman A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. , 1989 .

[48]  Stijn Dekeyser,et al.  Extending Google Docs to Collaborate on Research Papers , 2006 .

[49]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Development of the human interaction dimension of the Self‐Regulated Learning Questionnaire in asynchronous online learning environments , 2009 .

[50]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[51]  Sølvi Lillejord,et al.  Peer relations in peer learning , 2012 .

[52]  David M. Kennedy,et al.  Using Online Collaborative Tools for Groups to Co-Construct Knowledge , 2011, Online Inf. Rev..