The independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness in diversification

By examining the independent and joint effects of the skill and physical bases of relatedness, this study develops a multidimensional view of relatedness in diversification. The paper compares the ways the two bases identify relatedness, and examines empirically the relationship between relatedness and performance for a sample of 158 large diversified manufacturing firms. Each base of relatedness alone had no significant effect on financial performance. However, when the two approaches were combined, there was a strong positive effect on most indicators of performance. The findings demonstrate how different bases of relatedness complement and extend one another, and they clarify findings of previous studies that used a single base of relatedness. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Performance differences between the wrigley/rumelt strategic categories , 1988 .

[2]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[3]  Caron H. St. John,et al.  A methodological note on diversity measurement , 1994 .

[4]  Praveen R. Nayyar,et al.  On the measurement of corporate diversification strategy: Evidence from large U.S. service firms , 1992 .

[5]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF AN OBJECTIVE (ENTROPY) CATEGORICAL MEASURE OF DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY , 1993 .

[6]  R. Brandis.  The Limits of Organization , 1975 .

[7]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[8]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Taxonomic Approaches to Studying Strategy: Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues , 1984 .

[9]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[10]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[11]  John Lawrence Stimpert.  Managerial Thinking and Large Diversified Firms , 1992 .

[12]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Antecedents and Performance Outcomes of Diversification: A Review and Critique of Theoretical Perspectives , 1990 .

[13]  Vasudevan Ramanujam,et al.  Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis , 1989 .

[14]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[15]  Sayan Chatterjee,et al.  Excess Resources, Utilization Costs, And Mode Of Entry , 1990 .

[16]  A. Lemelin,et al.  Relatedness in the Patterns of Interindustry Diversification , 1982 .

[17]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[18]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Diversification strategies, business cycles and economic performance , 1988 .

[19]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[20]  S. Kay.  On the Nature of Expertise. , 1992 .

[21]  Ari Ginsberg,et al.  Connecting Diversification to Performance: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1990 .

[22]  R. Willig,et al.  Economies of scope , 1981 .

[23]  Richard A. Bettis,et al.  Diversification Strategy, Accounting Determined Risk, and Accounting Determined Return , 1982 .

[24]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Tobin's q and the Importance of Focus in Firm Performance , 1988 .

[25]  R. Rumelt.  Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[26]  Hiroyuki Itami.  Mobilizing invisible assets , 1987 .

[27]  James D. Blocher,et al.  Measurement of Firm Diversification: Is It Robust? , 1992 .

[28]  Moshe Farjoun.  Beyond Industry Boundaries: Human Expertise, Diversification and Resource-Related Industry Groups , 1994 .

[29]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence , 1991 .

[30]  R. Hall.  The strategic analysis of intangible resources , 1992 .

[31]  M. Hitt,et al.  Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance , 1985 .

[32]  Rachel Davis,et al.  Diversification, vertical integration, and industry analysis: New perspectives and measurement , 1992 .

[33]  E. Lindenberg,et al.  Tobin's q Ratio and Industrial Organization , 1981 .

[34]  K. E. Southwood.  Substantive Theory and Statistical Interaction: Five Models , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[36]  Aubrey Silberston,et al.  Diversification and Integration in American Industry. , 1962 .

[37]  H. Donald Hopkins,et al.  Firm Diversity: Conceptualization and Measurement , 1982 .

[38]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Industry Effects and Strategic Management Research , 1990 .

[39]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[40]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[41]  Howard Thomas,et al.  DIVERSITY, DIVERSIFICATION, AND PROFITABILITY AMONG BRITISH MANUFACTURING COMPANIES, 1972-84 , 1988 .

[42]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  Ecodynamics: A New Theory of Societal Evolution , 1978 .

[43]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Diversified expansion by large established firms , 1991 .

[44]  Donald A. Hay,et al.  Industrial Economics: Theory and Evidence , 1979 .

[45]  K. Palepu.  Diversification strategy, profit performance and the entropy measure , 1985 .

[46]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[47]  H. Theil.  Introduction to econometrics , 1978 .

[48]  R. Bettis.  Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms , 1981 .

[49]  A. Seth.  Value creation in acquisitions: A re‐examination of performance issues , 1990 .

[50]  P. R. Nayyar.  Performance Effects of Three Foci in Service Firms , 1992 .

[51]  L. Leemis.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1991 .

[52]  John G. Michel,et al.  DIVERSIFICATION POSTURE AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM CHARACTERISTICS , 1992 .

[53]  R. T. Beaty,et al.  The competitive challenge , 1993 .