Impact of an Expanded Hospital Recognition Program for Heart Failure Quality of Care

Background In 2009, the Get With The Guidelines–Heart Failure program enhanced the standard recognition of hospitals by offering additional recognition if hospitals performed well on certain quality measures. We sought to determine whether initiation of this enhanced recognition opportunity led to acceleration in quality of care for all hospitals participating in the program. Methods and Results We examined hospital‐level performance on 9 quality‐of‐care (process) measures that were added to an existing recognition program (based on existing published performance measures). The rate of increase in use over time 6 months to 2 years after the start of the program was compared with the rate of increase in use for the measures during the 18‐month period prior to the start of the program. Use increased for all 9 new quality measures from 2008 to 2011. Among 4 measures with baseline use near or lower than 50%, a statistically significant greater increase in use during the program was seen for implantable cardioverter defibrillator use (program versus preprogram use: odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.23). Among the 5 measures for which baseline use was 50% or higher, the increase in influenza vaccination rates actually slowed. There was no evidence of adverse impact on the 4 established quality measures, a composite of which actually increased faster during the expanded program (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15). Conclusions A program providing expanded hospital recognition for heart failure had mixed results in accelerating the use of 9 quality measures.

[1]  D. Staiger,et al.  Association between hospital recognition for nursing excellence and outcomes of very low-birth-weight infants. , 2012, JAMA.

[2]  A. Ryan,et al.  Medicare's public reporting initiative on hospital quality had modest or no impact on mortality from three key conditions. , 2012, Health affairs.

[3]  C. Yancy,et al.  Get With The Guidelines Program Participation, Process of Care, and Outcome for Medicare Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[4]  C. Yancy,et al.  Use of aldosterone antagonists in heart failure. , 2009, JAMA.

[5]  L. Schwamm,et al.  Hospital performance recognition with the Get With The Guidelines Program and mortality for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. , 2009, American heart journal.

[6]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Hospital variation and characteristics of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in patients with heart failure: data from the GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure) registry. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Radford,et al.  Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. , 2008, American heart journal.

[8]  Jerod M Loeb,et al.  Quality of Care in U . S . Hospitals as Reflected by Standardized Measures , 2002 – 2004 , 2005 .

[9]  Arnold Milstein,et al.  Has the leapfrog group had an impact on the health care market? , 2005, Health affairs.

[10]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? , 2003, Health affairs.

[11]  W. Ghali,et al.  Statewide quality improvement initiatives and mortality after cardiac surgery. , 1997, JAMA.

[12]  E. Hannan,et al.  The decline in coronary artery bypass graft surgery mortality in New York State. The role of surgeon volume. , 1995, JAMA.