On the Myths of Optical Burst Switching

This paper discusses merits and drawbacks of the Optical Burst Switching (OBS) paradigm, which received so much attention by the academic research community. Since the topic is hot, and given the several flavors of OBS available in the literature, we first define what we mean by OBS. Then, we carefully design a reference scenario and a set of evaluation experiments that can be used to obtain quantitative answers to interesting questions in a repeatable way. Within this framework, we motivate our skepticism towards two frequent assertions about the OBS paradigm: its ability to (i) exploit the network bandwidth more efficiently than Optical Circuit Switching (OCS) alternatives, and (ii) to efficiently solve contentions without optical buffers.

[1]  L. Wuttisittikulkij,et al.  Design of a WDM network using a multiple ring approach , 1997, GLOBECOM 97. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. Conference Record.

[2]  Piet Demeester,et al.  Performance analysis and dimensioning of multi-granular optical networks , 2009, Opt. Switch. Netw..

[3]  Tarek S. El-Bawab,et al.  Comparative Account of Bandwidth Efficiency in Optical Burst Switching and Optical Circuit Switching Networks , 2004, Photonic Network Communications.

[4]  Andrew Zalesky.  To burst or circuit switch? , 2009, TNET.

[5]  Pablo Pavón-Mariño,et al.  MatPlanWDM: An Educational Tool for Network Planning in Wavelength-Routing Networks , 2007, ONDM.

[6]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  Optical burst switching (OBS) - a new paradigm for an Optical Internet^{1} , 1999, J. High Speed Networks.

[7]  Jonathan S. Turner,et al.  Terabit burst switching , 1999, J. High Speed Networks.

[8]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  Study of traffic statistics of assembled burst traffic in optical burst-switched networks , 2002, SPIE ITCom.

[9]  V. R. Konda,et al.  Algorithm for traffic grooming in optical networks to minimize the number of transceivers , 2001, 2001 IEEE Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8552).

[10]  B. Jaumard,et al.  Performance comparison of OCS and OBS switching paradigms , 2005, Proceedings of 2005 7th International Conference Transparent Optical Networks, 2005..

[11]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Network optimization : continuous and discrete models , 1998 .

[12]  George N. Rouskas,et al.  A simulation study of optical burst switching and access protocols for WDM ring networks , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Josep Solé-Pareta,et al.  Service category-to-wavelength selection technique for QoS support in connection-oriented optical packet switching , 2007, Comput. Networks.

[14]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  A fair packet-level performance comparison of OBS and OCS , 2006, 2006 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[15]  Emilio Vargas.  Balancing Multifibre and Wavelength Converter Cost in Wavelength Routing Networks , 2008 .

[16]  Paul J. Kühn,et al.  Hybrid optical network architectures: bringing packets and circuits together , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  R.S. Tucker,et al.  Cost Comparison of Optical Circuit-Switched and Burst-Switched Networks , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[18]  Kumar N. Sivarajan,et al.  Design of Logical Topologies for Wavelength-Routed Optical Networks , 1996, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[19]  Yijun Xiong,et al.  Control architecture in optical burst-switched WDM networks , 2000, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[20]  You-Ze Cho,et al.  An Efficient Optical Burst Switching Technique for Multi-Hop Networks , 2004 .

[21]  S.J.B. Yoo,et al.  Performance comparison of optical burst and circuit switched networks , 2005, OFC/NFOEC Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2005..