The Role of Surprise in Hindsight Bias: A Metacognitive Model of Reduced and Reversed Hindsight Bias

Hindsight bias is the well researched phenomenon that people falsely believe that they would have correctly predicted the outcome of an event once it is known. In recent years, several authors have doubted the ubiquity of the effect and have reported a reversal under certain conditions. This article presents an integrative model on the role of surprise as one factor explaining the malleability of the hindsight bias. Three ways in which surprise influences the reconstruction of pre-outcome predictions are assumed: (1) Surprise is used as direct metacognitive heuristic to estimate the distance between outcome and prediction. (2) Surprise triggers a deliberate sense-making process, and (3) also biases this process by enhancing the retrieval of surprise-congruent information and expectancy-based hypothesis testing.

[1]  David Mazursky,et al.  “I could never have expected it to happen”: The reversal of the hindsight bias , 1990 .

[2]  B. Mellers.  Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  W. Meyer,et al.  Toward a Process Analysis of Emotions: The Case of Surprise , 1997 .

[4]  Steffen Nestler,et al.  COGNITIVE PROCESS MODELS OF HINDSIGHT BIAS , 2007 .

[5]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Accessibility experiences and the hindsight bias: I knew it all along versus it could never have happened , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Christian Unkelbach,et al.  The Learned Interpretation of Cognitive Fluency , 2006, Psychological science.

[7]  R. Pieters,et al.  Individual differences in reverse Hindsight bias: I never thought something like chernobyl would happen. Did I? , 1988 .

[8]  Sabine Sczesny,et al.  Exculpating victims and the reversal of hindsight bias , 1999 .

[9]  M. Pezzo,et al.  Making sense of failure: A motivated model of hindsight bias. , 2007 .

[10]  A. Luchins,et al.  On an approach to social perception. , 1950, Journal of personality.

[11]  G Gigerenzer,et al.  Hindsight bias: a by-product of knowledge updating? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  David Faust,et al.  Eliminating the hindsight bias. , 1988 .

[13]  I. Ritov,et al.  Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options , 1997 .

[14]  R. Hastie,et al.  Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. , 1990 .

[15]  D. Stahlberg,et al.  Strength of hindsight bias as a consequence of meta-cognitions , 2003, Memory.

[16]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Perceived Informativeness of Facts. , 1977 .

[17]  R. Reisenzein.  Exploring the Strength of Association between the Components of Emotion Syndromes: The Case of Surprise , 2000 .

[18]  N. Schwarz,et al.  When debiasing backfires: accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[20]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Hindsight ≠ foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty* , 2003 .

[21]  D. Schkade,et al.  Expectation-outcome consistency and hindsight bias , 1991 .

[22]  B. Renner.  Hindsight bias after receiving self-relevant health risk information: A motivational perspective , 2003, Memory.

[23]  Steffen Nestler,et al.  How many hindsight biases are there? , 2008, Cognition.

[24]  G. Clore.  Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. , 1992 .

[25]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Comparison Processes in Hindsight and Causal Attribution , 1995 .

[26]  Dieter Frey,et al.  Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[27]  R. Pohl,et al.  HINDSIGHT BIAS: ON BEING WISE AFTER THE EVENT , 2007 .

[28]  Gordon Wood,et al.  The knew-it-all-along effect. , 1978 .

[29]  S. Mellor,et al.  Effect of self-relevance of an event on hindsight bias: The foreseeability of a layoff. , 1991 .

[30]  Frank R. Kardes,et al.  Selective hypothesis testing , 1998 .

[31]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  The Message Within : The Role of Subjective Experience In Social Cognition And Behavior , 2000 .

[32]  Anne Maass,et al.  Hindsight bias: Impaired memory or biased reconstruction? , 1996 .

[33]  B. Fischoff.  Hindsight (Not Equal To) Foresight: The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Judgment Under Uncertainty. , 1975 .

[34]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[35]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once—future things , 1975 .

[36]  Jay J.J. Christensen-Szalanski,et al.  The hindsight bias: A meta-analysis , 1991 .

[37]  Mary T. Curren,et al.  "I knew we would win": hindsight bias for favorable and unfavorable team decision outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  M. Pezzo,et al.  Surprise, defence, or making sense: What removes hindsight bias? , 2003, Memory.

[39]  L. Sanna,et al.  METACOGNITIVE EXPERIENCES AND HINDSIGHT BIAS: IT'S NOT JUST THE THOUGHT (CONTENT) THAT COUNTS! , 2007 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[41]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Integrating Temporal Biases , 2004, Psychological science.

[42]  Dieter Frey,et al.  We Knew It All Along: Hindsight Bias in Groups , 1995 .

[43]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[44]  N. Roese,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function , 1997 .

[45]  M. F. Davies,et al.  Reduction of hindsight bias by restoration of foresight perspective: Effectiveness of foresight-encoding and hindsight-retrieval strategies. , 1987 .

[46]  Anders Winman,et al.  The importance of item selection in ''knew-it-all-along'' studies of general knowledge , 1997 .

[47]  A. Koriat,et al.  Processes underlying metacognitive judgments: Information-based and experience-based monitoring of one's own knowledge. , 1999 .

[48]  David Mazursky,et al.  Does a surprising outcome reinforce or reverse the hindsight bias , 1997 .

[49]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Debiasing the hindsight bias: The role of accessibility experiences and (mis)attributions , 2003 .

[50]  A. Greenwald.  The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. , 1980 .

[51]  Fred B. Bryant,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Research on Hindsight Bias , 2004 .

[52]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight , 1982 .

[53]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Decomposing the Hindsight Bias : A Multinomial Processing Tree Model for Separating Recollection and Reconstruction in Hindsight , 2004 .

[54]  R. Pohl.  The Effects of Feedback Source and Plausibility of Hindsight Bias , 1998 .

[55]  R. Pohl,et al.  SARA: A cognitive process model to simulate the anchoring effect and hindsight bias , 2003, Memory.

[56]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. , 1999 .

[57]  B. W. Whittlesea,et al.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Outcome feedback: hindsight and information , 1989 .

[59]  J. Forgas.  Feeling and thinking : the role of affect in social cognition , 2000 .

[60]  T. Louie.  Decision makers' hindsight bias after receiving favorable and unfavorable feedback. , 1999 .

[61]  Udo Rudolph,et al.  Temporal characteristics of the surprise reaction induced by schema-discrepant visual and auditory events , 1994 .

[62]  I. Ritov,et al.  Emotion-based choice , 1999 .