Challenges and opportunities for involving patients and the public in acute antimicrobial medicine development research: an interview study

Objectives To explore what approaches to patient and public involvement (PPI) in antimicrobial medicines development are currently being used, what the impacts of PPI are on antimicrobial medicines development and what the barriers are to its implementation. Design Interview study. Setting Antimicrobial medicines development research. Participants Principal investigators known to have led studies involving PPI or expressed an interest in PPI. Results There is very little published work on PPI in antimicrobial research. Individual interviewees expressed scepticism about the contribution that PPI could make to different stages of the medicines development life cycle but collectively identified a range of potential benefits of PPI covering most stages of the medicines development process. Conclusions A major issue in developing PPI in antimicrobial medicines development research will be in overcoming the view that, at best, PPI has only a marginal contribution to make in this area of research. The findings from this study, although mixed, suggest that well-designed PPI has an untapped potential to enhance antimicrobial research.

[1]  P. Beresford,et al.  Patient and public involvement in research , 2020 .

[2]  Alasdair P. MacGowan,et al.  Practical guide: Patient and public involvement in antimicrobial medicines development research , 2018 .

[3]  Maria Horne,et al.  Openness, inclusion and transparency in the practice of public involvement in research: A reflective exercise to develop best practice recommendations , 2017, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[4]  A. MacGowan,et al.  Extent, quality and impact of patient and public involvement in antimicrobial drug development research: A systematic review , 2017, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[5]  Andy Gibson,et al.  Evaluating patient and public involvement in health research: from theoretical model to practical workshop , 2017, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[6]  R. Segurado,et al.  Theory-driven group-based complex intervention to support self-management of osteoarthritis and low back pain in primary care physiotherapy: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial (SOLAS) , 2016, BMJ Open.

[7]  M. Dent,et al.  Patient involvement in Europe--a comparative framework. , 2015, Journal of health organization and management.

[8]  S. Staniszewska,et al.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[9]  J Popay,et al.  Exploring areas of consensus and conflict around values underpinning public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study , 2014, BMJ Open.

[10]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  Optimizing patient involvement in quality improvement , 2013, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  Andy Gibson,et al.  Theoretical directions for an emancipatory concept of patient and public involvement , 2012, Health.

[12]  J. Ives,et al.  PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who's sailing the ship? , 2012, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[13]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[14]  Judith E. Sturges,et al.  Comparing Telephone and Face-to-Face Qualitative Interviewing: a Research Note , 2004 .

[15]  L. Spencer,et al.  Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research , 2002 .

[16]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook , 1999 .

[17]  Steven Epstein,et al.  The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials , 1995, Science, technology & human values.

[18]  Graham P Martin,et al.  'Ordinary people only': knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. , 2008, Sociology of health & illness.