Innovative Flow-Field Combination Design on Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Performance

The flow-field design of Direct Methanol Fuel Cells (DMFCs) is an important subject about the DMFCs performance. Flow-fields play an important role on ability to transport fuel and drive out the products (H2 O, CO2 ). In general, most of fuel cells utilize the same structure of flow-field for both anode and cathode. The popular flow-fields used for DMFCs are parallel and grid designs. Nevertheless, the characteristics of reactants and products are entirely different in anode and cathode of DMFCs. Therefore; the influences of the flow-fields designs on the cell performance were investigated due to the same logic for catalyst used for cathode and anode differently. To get the better and more stable performance of DMFC, three flow-fields (Parallel, Grid and Serpentine) are utilized with different combination were studied in this research. As a consequence, by using parallel flow-field in anode side and serpentine flow -field in cathode, the most and highest power output was obtained.Copyright © 2005 by ASME

[1]  Tianshou Zhao,et al.  Effect of anode flow field design on the performance of liquid feed direct methanol fuel cells , 2005 .

[2]  C. Pu,et al.  Carbon supported and unsupported Pt–Ru anodes for liquid feed direct methanol fuel cells , 1998 .

[3]  A. K. Shukla,et al.  A vapour-feed direct-methanol fuel cell with proton-exchange membrane electrolyte , 1995 .

[4]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  Electro-osmotic Drag of Water in Poly(perfluorosulfonic acid) Membranes , 2001 .

[5]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Electrochemical and flow characterization of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2004 .

[6]  T. Nguyen,et al.  Multicomponent transport in porous electrodes of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using the interdigitated gas distributors , 1999 .

[7]  Trung Van Nguyen,et al.  A Gas Distributor Design for Proton‐Exchange‐Membrane Fuel Cells , 1996 .

[8]  W. Vielstich,et al.  Investigation of methanol crossover and single electrode performance during PEMDMFC operation: A study using a solid polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system , 1998 .

[9]  W. M. Taama,et al.  The impact of mass transport and methanol crossover on the direct methanol fuel cell , 1999 .

[10]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Modelling of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with variable degrees of water flooding , 2000 .

[11]  C. Hebling,et al.  Visualization of water buildup in the cathode of a transparent PEM fuel cell , 2003 .

[12]  Keith Scott,et al.  Engineering aspects of the direct methanol fuel cell system , 1999 .

[13]  W. Preidel,et al.  Status of the development of a direct methanol fuel cell , 1999 .

[14]  Christopher Hebling,et al.  Investigation of fractal flow-fields in portable proton exchange membrane and direct methanol fuel cells , 2004 .

[15]  Keith Scott,et al.  Carbon dioxide evolution patterns in direct methanol fuel cells , 1999 .

[16]  N. Sakai,et al.  Oxygen Surface Exchange of Y 0.2Ce0.8 O 2 − x under Reducing Atmosphere , 1999 .

[17]  George A. Olah,et al.  Direct Methanol Fuel Cells , 2004 .

[18]  A. Shukla,et al.  Effect of carbon-supported and unsupported Pt–Ru anodes on the performance of solid-polymer-electrolyte direct methanol fuel cells , 1999 .

[19]  Shimshon Gottesfeld,et al.  High performance direct methanol polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 1996 .

[20]  Antonino S. Aricò,et al.  Comparison of Ethanol and Methanol Oxidation in a Liquid‐Feed Solid Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell at High Temperature , 1999 .

[21]  Karl V. Kordesch,et al.  Fuel cells and their applications , 1996 .

[22]  Qiang Ye,et al.  In situ visualization study of CO2 gas bubble behavior in DMFC anode flow fields , 2005 .

[23]  T. Nguyen,et al.  Effect of direct liquid water injection and interdigitated flow field on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 1998 .

[24]  Keith Scott,et al.  Electrochemical and gas evolution characteristics of direct methanol fuel cells with stainless steel mesh flow beds , 2001 .