Traditional molecular markers and response to adjuvant endocrine or trastuzumab-based therapies

Purpose of review The accurate assessment of traditional molecular markers is essential to inform the choice of the adjuvant systemic treatments for patients with breast cancer. Extensive research efforts have been made to explore whether it is also possible to predict the actual response to the different therapeutic options based on the expression of these markers. Recent findings Endocrine responsiveness of breast cancer has been eventually defined according to the expression of estrogen receptors in at least 1% of invasive tumor cells. The quantitative evaluation of estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors (PgR) and Ki-67 labeling index may help in selecting patients with estrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative tumors who can be spared or may benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to endocrine therapy. Guideline recommendations for an optimal testing of estrogen receptors and PgR have been issued to assist pathologists in the accurate assessment of these markers. Progress has also been made in the identification of candidate patients to HER2-targeted therapies and in the prediction of response to trastuzumab. Summary Traditional molecular markers play a major role in the selection of candidate patients to systemic interventions, but they are of limited value in predicting their actual response to the different treatments, especially when the markers are evaluated individually.

[1]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  P. Neven,et al.  Prognostic and Predictive Value of Centrally Reviewed Expression of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in a Randomized Trial Comparing Letrozole and Tamoxifen Adjuvant Therapy for Postmenopausal Early Breast Cancer : BIG 198 , 2007 .

[4]  S. Paik,et al.  Benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab may not be confined to patients with IHC 3+ and/or FISH-positive tumors: Central testing results from NSABP B-31 , 2007 .

[5]  P. Neven,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  A. Luini,et al.  Increasing steroid hormone receptors expression defines breast cancer subtypes non responsive to preoperative chemotherapy , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  J. Forbes,et al.  Is adjuvant chemotherapy of benefit for postmenopausal women who receive endocrine treatment for highly endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer? International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VII and 12–93 , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[8]  Maurizio Scaltriti,et al.  A Naturally Occurring HER2 Carboxy-Terminal Fragment Promotes Mammary Tumor Growth and Metastasis , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[9]  S. Bersani,et al.  Genotypic intratumoral heterogeneity in breast carcinoma with HER2/neu amplification: evaluation according to ASCO/CAP criteria. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  N. Sneige,et al.  Performance of chromogenic in situ hybridization on testing HER2 Status in breast carcinomas with chromosome 17 polysomy and equivocal (2+) herceptest results: a study of two institutions using the conventional and new ASCO/CAP scoring criteria. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  S. Gunn,et al.  Clinical validation of an array CGH test for HER2 status in breast cancer reveals that polysomy 17 is a rare event , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[12]  Raymond R Tubbs,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity in HER2 testing in breast cancer: panel summary and guidelines. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[13]  J. Baselga,et al.  A Naturally Occurring HER 2 Carboxy-Terminal Fragment Promotes Mammary Tumor Growth and Metastasis † , 2009 .

[14]  A. Wellstein,et al.  The role and regulation of the nuclear receptor co-activator AIB1 in breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[15]  Jorma Isola,et al.  Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide with either docetaxel or vinorelbine, with or without trastuzumab, as adjuvant treatments of breast cancer: final results of the FinHer Trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Emerging technologies for assessing HER2 amplification. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  Mitch Dowsett,et al.  Disease-free survival according to degree of HER2 amplification for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without 1 year of trastuzumab: the HERA Trial. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  S. Paik,et al.  Prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in endocrine responsive, early breast cancer using multigene assays. , 2009, Breast.

[19]  M. Hauptmann,et al.  Estrogen receptor-alpha phosphorylation at serine-118 and tamoxifen response in breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  R. Gelber,et al.  Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009 , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  K. Blackwell,et al.  Lapatinib monotherapy in patients with HER2-overexpressing relapsed or refractory inflammatory breast cancer: final results and survival of the expanded HER2+ cohort in EGF103009, a phase II study. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[22]  G. Viale Be precise! The need to consider the mechanisms for CEP17 copy number changes in breast cancer , 2009, The Journal of pathology.

[23]  A. Goldhirsch,et al.  Lessons on responsiveness to adjuvant systemic therapies learned from the neoadjuvant setting. , 2009, Breast.

[24]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Does chromosome 17 centromere copy number predict polysomy in breast cancer? A fluorescence in situ hybridization and microarray‐based CGH analysis , 2009, The Journal of pathology.

[25]  Satoru Takahashi,et al.  Predictors of response to exemestane as primary endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer , 2009, Cancer science.

[26]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Loss of HER2 Amplification Following Trastuzumab-Based Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy and Survival Outcomes , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[27]  S. O'toole,et al.  Prediction of local recurrence, distant metastases, and death after breast-conserving therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer using a five-biomarker panel. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  I. Ellis,et al.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization: a multicenter study comparing silver in situ hybridization with FISH. , 2009, American journal of clinical pathology.

[29]  P. Diest,et al.  Absence of chromosome 17 polysomy in breast cancer: analysis by CEP17 chromogenic in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[30]  Donald A Berry,et al.  NCCN Task Force Report: Estrogen Receptor and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer by Immunohistochemistry. , 2009, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[31]  J. Mackey,et al.  Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  G. Dranitsaris,et al.  Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases? , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[33]  F. Penault-Llorca,et al.  Ki67 expression and docetaxel efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  Robin L. Jones,et al.  Relationship between oestrogen receptor status and proliferation in predicting response and long-term outcome to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[35]  M. Fernö,et al.  AIB1 is a predictive factor for tamoxifen response in premenopausal women. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Ki67 in breast cancer: prognostic and predictive potential. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[37]  Peter A Fasching,et al.  Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the GeparQuattro study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[39]  M. Hammond,et al.  Variable specimen handling affects hormone receptor test results in women with breast cancer: a large multihospital retrospective study. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[40]  S. Chandarlapaty,et al.  Clinical Benefit of Lapatinib-Based Therapy in Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Tumors Coexpressing the Truncated p95HER2 Receptor , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[41]  S. Johnston,et al.  An open-label expanded access study of lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with HER2-overexpressing locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[42]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. , 2010, The Lancet. Oncology.

[43]  J. Baselga,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort , 2010, The Lancet.

[44]  A. Luini,et al.  A nomogram based on the expression of Ki-67, steroid hormone receptors status and number of chemotherapy courses to predict pathological complete remission after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[45]  M. Untch,et al.  Reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  S. Chandarlapaty,et al.  Inhibitors of HSP90 block p95-HER2 signaling in Trastuzumab-resistant tumors and suppress their growth , 2009, Oncogene.

[47]  S. Chan,et al.  Treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with lapatinib and capecitabine in the lapatinib expanded access programme, including efficacy in brain metastases – the UK experience , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.