Context-Dependent Upper Limb Prosthesis Control for Natural and Robust Use

Pattern recognition and regression methods applied to the surface EMG have been used for estimating the user intended motor tasks across multiple degrees of freedom (DOF), for prosthetic control. While these methods are effective in several conditions, they are still characterized by some shortcomings. In this study we propose a methodology that combines these two approaches for mutually alleviating their limitations. This resulted in a control method capable of context-dependent movement estimation that switched automatically between sequential (one DOF at a time) or simultaneous (multiple DOF) prosthesis control, based on an online estimation of signal dimensionality. The proposed method was evaluated in scenarios close to real-life situations, with the control of a physical prosthesis in applied tasks of varying difficulties. Test prostheses were individually manufactured for both able-bodied and transradial amputee subjects. With these prostheses, two amputees performed the Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure test with scores of 58 and 71 points. The five able-bodied individuals performed standardized tests, such as the box&block and clothes pin test, reducing the completion times by up to 30%, with respect to using a state-of-the-art pure sequential control algorithm. Apart from facilitating fast simultaneous movements, the proposed control scheme was also more intuitive to use, since human movements are predominated by simultaneous activations across joints. The proposed method thus represents a significant step towards intelligent, intuitive and natural control of upper limb prostheses.

[1]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[2]  Dario Farina,et al.  Is Accurate Mapping of EMG Signals on Kinematics Needed for Precise Online Myoelectric Control? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  D. Yatsenko,et al.  Simultaneous, Proportional, Multi-axis Prosthesis Control using Multichannel Surface EMG , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Kernel Null Space Methods for Novelty Detection , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  C. Light,et al.  Establishing a standardized clinical assessment tool of pathologic and prosthetic hand function: normative data, reliability, and validity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  D. Farina,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Regression Techniques for Simultaneous and Proportional Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Jieping Ye,et al.  Computational and Theoretical Analysis of Null Space and Orthogonal Linear Discriminant Analysis , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Novelty detection: a review - part 2: : neural network based approaches , 2003, Signal Process..

[10]  Mohammad M D Sobuh,et al.  Visuomotor behaviours when using a myoelectric prosthesis , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[12]  Diane Atkins,et al.  A Functional Baseline Index Standard For Electric Multi-Articulating Hands And Digits , 2006 .

[13]  Markus Nowak,et al.  EMG-based prediction of multi-DOF activations using single-DOF training: a preliminary result , 2014 .

[14]  E. Biddiss,et al.  Upper-Limb Prosthetics: Critical Factors in Device Abandonment , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[15]  Patrick van der Smagt,et al.  Robotics of human movements , 2009, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[16]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Novelty detection: a review - part 1: statistical approaches , 2003, Signal Process..

[17]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Support Vector Method for Novelty Detection , 1999, NIPS.

[18]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Preliminary functional assessment of a multigrasp myoelectric prosthesis , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  Support Vector Regression for Improved Real-Time, Simultaneous Myoelectric Control , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Kristin Østlie,et al.  Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[21]  Hanneke Bouwsema,et al.  Determining skill level in myoelectric prosthesis use with multiple outcome measures. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Dario Farina,et al.  A surface EMG generation model with multilayer cylindrical description of the volume conductor , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Dario Farina,et al.  Evaluating upper-limb EMG-prosthesis user performance by combining psychometric measures and classification-rates , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[24]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to statistical pattern recognition (2nd ed.) , 1990 .

[27]  C Almström,et al.  Clinical application study of multifunctional prosthetic hands. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  Dario Farina,et al.  A Multi-Class Proportional Myocontrol Algorithm for Upper Limb Prosthesis Control: Validation in Real-Life Scenarios on Amputees , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  Øyvind Stavdahl,et al.  System training and assessment in simultaneous proportional myoelectric prosthesis control , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[30]  Max Ortiz-Catalan,et al.  On the viability of implantable electrodes for the natural control of artificial limbs: Review and discussion , 2012, Biomedical engineering online.

[31]  Lauren H Smith,et al.  A comparison of the real-time controllability of pattern recognition to conventional myoelectric control for discrete and simultaneous movements , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  R B Stein,et al.  Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  Wirta Rw,et al.  Myocoder-computer study of electromyographic patterns. , 1967 .

[34]  Erik J. Scheme,et al.  Confidence-Based Rejection for Improved Pattern Recognition Myoelectric Control , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Felix Reinhart,et al.  Assessment of human-likeness and naturalness of interceptive arm reaching movement accomplished by a humanoid robot , 2014 .

[36]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[37]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.