Characterisation of hydraulic head changes and aquifer properties in the London Basin using Persistent Scatterer Interferometry ground motion data

In this paper, Persistent Scatterer Interferometry was applied to ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT satellite data covering 1992–2000 and 2002–2010 respectively, to analyse the relationship between ground motion and hydraulic head changes in the London Basin, United Kingdom. The integration of observed groundwater levels provided by the Environment Agency and satellite-derived displacement time series allowed the estimation of the spatio-temporal variations of the Chalk aquifer storage coefficient and compressibility over an area of ∼1360 km2. The average storage coefficient of the aquifer reaches values of 1 × 10−3 and the estimated average aquifer compressibility is 7.7 × 10−10 Pa−1 and 1.2 × 10−9 Pa−1 for the periods 1992–2000 and 2002–2010, respectively. Derived storage coefficient values appear to be correlated with the hydrogeological setting, where confined by the London Clay the storage coefficient is typically an order of magnitude lower than where the chalk is overlain by the Lambeth Group. PSI-derived storage coefficient estimates agree with the values obtained from pumping tests in the same area. A simplified one-dimensional model is applied to simulate the ground motion response to hydraulic heads changes at nine piezometers. The comparison between simulated and satellite-observed ground motion changes reveals good agreement, with errors ranging between 1.4 and 6.9 mm, and being 3.2 mm on average.

[1]  D. Galloway,et al.  The application of satellite differential SAR interferometry-derived ground displacements in hydrogeology , 2007 .

[2]  V. J. Banks,et al.  Anomalous buried hollows in London: development of a hazard susceptibility map , 2015 .

[3]  H. Moser,et al.  A new method of measuring , 1999 .

[4]  H. H. Cooper The equation of groundwater flow in fixed and deforming coordinates , 1966 .

[5]  R. Dearden,et al.  A geological model of London and the Thames Valley, southeast England , 2014 .

[6]  John P. Bloomfield,et al.  Some relationships between lithology, basin form and hydrology: a case study from the Thames basin, UK , 2011 .

[7]  K. Terzaghi Theory of Consolidation , 2007 .

[8]  Chris King,et al.  Geology of London, UK , 2012 .

[10]  Donald C. Helm,et al.  One‐dimensional simulation of aquifer system compaction near Pixley, California: 1. Constant parameters , 1975 .

[11]  Norman Teferle,et al.  Geological interpretation of current subsidence and uplift in the London area, UK, as shown by high precision satellite-based surveying , 2014 .

[12]  Interference pumping tests in a fractured limestone (Poitiers – France): Inversion of data by means of dual-medium approaches , 2007 .

[13]  A. Ferretti,et al.  Permanent scatterer InSAR reveals seasonal and long‐term aquifer‐system response to groundwater pumping and artificial recharge , 2008 .

[14]  J. N. Hutchinson Possible late Quaternary pingo remnants in central London , 1980, Nature.

[15]  D. T. Aldiss,et al.  Under-representation of faults on geological maps of the London region: reasons, consequences and solutions , 2013 .

[16]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Estimating temporal changes in hydraulic head using InSAR data in the San Luis Valley, Colorado , 2014 .

[17]  Gerardo Herrera,et al.  Persistent Scatterer Interferometry subsidence data exploitation using spatial tools: The Vega Media of the Segura River Basin case study , 2011 .

[18]  Howard A. Zebker,et al.  Seasonal subsidence and rebound in Las Vegas Valley, Nevada, observed by Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry , 2001 .

[19]  W. H. Ward,et al.  GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT OF A SITE AT MUNDFORD, NORFOLK, FOR A LARGE PROTON ACCELERATOR. , 1968 .

[20]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Mapping small elevation changes over large areas: Differential radar interferometry , 1989 .

[21]  F. Bell A note on the physical properties of the chalk , 1977 .

[22]  Davide Notti,et al.  Lithological control of land subsidence induced by groundwater withdrawal in new urban AREAS (Granada Basin, SE Spain). Multiband DInSAR monitoring , 2016 .

[23]  H. Zebker,et al.  A new method for measuring deformation on volcanoes and other natural terrains using InSAR persistent scatterers , 2004 .

[24]  Andrew McKenzie,et al.  The physical properties of major aquifers in England and Wales , 1997 .

[25]  Davide Notti,et al.  Twenty-year advanced DInSAR analysis of severe land subsidence: The Alto Guadalentín Basin (Spain) case study , 2015 .

[26]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry , 1999, Remote Sensing.

[27]  R. Sage,et al.  Aquifer Recharge: An Operational Drought‐Management Strategy in North London , 1999 .

[28]  Woods,et al.  Geology of London : special memoir for 1:50000 geological sheets 256 (north London), 257 (Romford), 270 (south London), and 271 (Dartford) (England and Wales) , 2004 .

[29]  Fabrizio Novali,et al.  Monitoring horizontal and vertical surface deformation over a hydrocarbon reservoir by PSInSAR , 2010 .

[30]  Gerardo Herrera,et al.  Advanced interpretation of subsidence in Murcia (SE Spain) using A-DInSAR data - modelling and validation , 2009 .

[31]  Thomas J. Burbey,et al.  Use of time–subsidence data during pumping to characterize specific storage and hydraulic conductivity of semi-confining units , 2003 .

[32]  P. J. Chilton,et al.  Groundwater and its susceptibility to degradation : a global assessment of the problem and options for management , 2003 .

[33]  R. Jackson,et al.  Comparison of measured and calculated hydraulic conductivities of unsaturated soils , 1965 .

[34]  Howard A. Zebker,et al.  Inverse modeling of interbed storage parameters using land subsidence observations, Antelope Valley, California , 2003 .

[36]  C. E. Jacob On the flow of water in an elastic artesian aquifer , 1940 .

[37]  A. MacDonald,et al.  Aquifer properties of the Chalk of England , 2001, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology.

[38]  M. Sneed,et al.  Aquifer-System compaction and land subsidence: Measurements, analyses, and simulations-the Holly Site, Edwards Air Force Base, Antelope Valley, California , 2000 .

[39]  Jordi J. Mallorquí,et al.  Segura River Aquifer (SE Spain) Obtained by Means of Advanced DInSAR , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[40]  E. Fielding,et al.  Predictability of hydraulic head changes and characterization of aquifer‐system and fault properties from InSAR‐derived ground deformation , 2014 .

[41]  Luke Bateson,et al.  Natural and Anthropogenic Geohazards in Greater London Observed from Geological and ERS-1/2 and ENVISAT Persistent Scatterers Ground Motion Data: Results from the EC FP7-SPACE PanGeo Project , 2014, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[42]  G. Teutsch,et al.  Effects of the investigation scale on pumping test results in heterogeneous porous aquifers , 1994 .

[43]  Thierry Rabaute,et al.  Radar interferometry: limits and potential , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[44]  V. A. Fry,et al.  Lessons from London: regulation of open-loop ground source heat pumps in central London , 2009 .

[45]  Katy Freeborough,et al.  Determination of the shrinking and swelling properties of the London Clay Formation : laboratory report , 2006 .

[46]  Katherine Royse,et al.  Geological 3D modelling : scientific discovery and enhanced understanding of the subsurface, with examples from the UK , 2010 .

[47]  K. Royse,et al.  Chalk: its stratigraphy, structure and engineering geology in east London and the Thames Gateway , 2011 .

[48]  K. van Thienen-Visser,et al.  On the effect of horizontal deformation on insar subsidence estimates , 2009 .

[49]  A. Dodson,et al.  Measuring changes in land and sea levels: a regional study of the Thames Estuary and River Thames , 2007 .

[50]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Detection of aquifer system compaction and land subsidence using interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Antelope Valley, Mojave Desert, California , 1998 .

[51]  Yan Jiang,et al.  City subsidence observed with persistent scatterer InSAR , 2010 .

[52]  A. Charalambous,et al.  The hydrogeology of the Enfield-Haringey artificial recharge scheme, north London , 1995, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[53]  C. P. Abbiss A comparison of the stiffness of the chalk at Mundford from a seismic survey and a large scale tank test , 1979 .

[54]  L. Jones,et al.  Modelling Volume Change Potential in the London Clay , 2011 .

[55]  P. G. Carter,et al.  A Study of the strength, compressibility, and density trends within the chalk of South East England , 1974, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[56]  M. Price Fluid flow in the Chalk of England , 1987, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[57]  M. H. de Freitas,et al.  Geology; its principles, practice and potential for Geotechnics , 2009 .

[58]  Batuhan Osmanoglu,et al.  Monitoring land subsidence and its induced geological hazard with Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry: A case study in Morelia, Mexico , 2012 .

[59]  J. F. Poland Guidebook to studies of land subsidence due to ground-water withdrawal , 1984 .

[60]  Donald C. Helm,et al.  One‐dimensional simulation of aquifer system compaction near Pixley, California: 2. Stress‐Dependent Parameters , 1976 .

[61]  T. Strozzi,et al.  Interferometric Point Target Analysis with JERS-1 L-band SAR data , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[62]  Gerardo Herrera,et al.  A quasi-elastic aquifer deformational behavior: Madrid aquifer case study , 2014 .

[63]  J. Bloomfield,et al.  Regional trends in matrix porosity and dry density of the Chalk of England , 1995, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology.

[64]  T. G. Newman,et al.  The impact of adverse geological conditions on the design and construction of the Thames Water Ring Main in Greater London, UK , 2009 .

[65]  R. Tomás,et al.  A ground subsidence study based on DInSAR data: calibration of soil parameters and subsidence prediction in Murcia City (Spain) , 2010 .

[66]  L. Bateson,et al.  Terrafirma : London H-3 Modelled Product : comparison of PS data with the results of a groundwater abstraction related subsidence model , 2009 .

[67]  Khaled S. Balkhair Aquifer parameters determination for large diameter wells using neural network approach , 2002 .