A roll-to-roll process to flexible polymer solar cells: model studies, manufacture and operational stability studies

An inverted polymer solar cell geometry comprising a total of five layers was optimized using laboratory scale cells and the operational stability was studied under model atmospheres. The device geometry was substrate-ITO-ZnO-(active layer)-PEDOT:PSS-silver with P3HT-PCBM as the active layer. The inverted devices were compared to model devices with a normal geometry where the order of the layers was substrate-ITO-PEDOT:PSS-(active layer)-aluminium. In both cases illumination was through the substrate which requires that it is transparent. Both device types were optimized to a power conversion efficiency of 2.7% (1000 W m−2, AM1.5G, 72 ± 2 °C). The devices were operated under illumination while being subjected to different atmospheres to identify the dominant modes of degradation. Dry nitrogen (99.999%), dry oxygen (99.5%), humid nitrogen (90 ± 5% relative humidity) and ambient atmosphere (20% oxygen, 20 ± 5% relative humidity) were employed and both device types were found to be stable in a nitrogen atmosphere during the test period of 200 hours. The devices with a normal geometry where an aluminium electrode is employed gave stable operation in dry oxygen but did not give stable device operation in the presence of humidity. The inverted devices behaved oppositely where the less reactive silver electrode gave stable operation in the presence of humidity but poor stability in the presence of oxygen. The inverted model device was then used to develop a new process giving access to fully roll-to-roll (R2R) processed polymer solar cells entirely by solution processing starting from a polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) substrate with a layer of indium-tin-oxide (ITO). All processing was performed in air without vacuum coating steps and modules comprising eight serially connected cells gave power conversion efficiencies as high as 2.1% for the full module with 120 cm2 active area (AM1.5G, 393 W m−2) and up to 2.3% for modules with 4.8 cm2 active area (AM1.5G, 1000 W m−2).

[1]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Polymer solar cell modules prepared using roll-to-roll methods: Knife-over-edge coating, slot-die coating and screen printing , 2009 .

[2]  Ole Hagemann,et al.  Thermo-cleavable solvents for printing conjugated polymers: Application in polymer solar cells , 2009 .

[3]  Ole Hagemann,et al.  A complete process for production of flexible large area polymer solar cells entirely using screen printing—First public demonstration , 2009 .

[4]  F. Krebs Fabrication and processing of polymer solar cells: A review of printing and coating techniques , 2009 .

[5]  Kion Norrman,et al.  Water-induced degradation of polymer solar cells studied by H2(18)O labeling. , 2009, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[6]  F. Krebs,et al.  Thermocleavable Low Band Gap Polymers and Solar Cells Therefrom with Remarkable Stability toward Oxygen , 2008 .

[7]  Andreas W. Liehr,et al.  High throughput testing platform for organic Solar Cells , 2008 .

[8]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  A simple nanostructured polymer/ZnO hybrid solar cell—preparation and operation in air , 2008, Nanotechnology.

[9]  Andreas Gombert,et al.  Organic solar cell modules for specific applications—From energy autonomous systems to large area photovoltaics , 2008 .

[10]  Martijn Lenes,et al.  Small Bandgap Polymers for Organic Solar Cells (Polymer Material Development in the Last 5 Years) , 2008 .

[11]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Biodegradable polymer solar cells , 2008 .

[12]  Suren A. Gevorgyan,et al.  A setup for studying stability and degradation of polymer solar cells , 2008 .

[13]  F. Krebs Air stable polymer photovoltaics based on a process free from vacuum steps and fullerenes , 2008 .

[14]  F. Krebs,et al.  Stability/degradation of polymer solar cells , 2008 .

[15]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Solution-Processed Organic Solar Cells , 2008 .

[16]  Christoph J. Brabec,et al.  Realization, characterization, and optical modeling of inverted bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells , 2008 .

[17]  Yi Cui,et al.  Solution-processed metal nanowire mesh transparent electrodes. , 2008, Nano letters.

[18]  J. Fréchet,et al.  Polymer-fullerene composite solar cells. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[19]  F. Krebs,et al.  Low band gap polymers for organic photovoltaics , 2007 .

[20]  Kion Norrman,et al.  Detrimental Effect of Inert Atmospheres on Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Semiconductor Oxides , 2007 .

[21]  N. S. Sariciftci,et al.  Conjugated polymer-based organic solar cells. , 2007, Chemical reviews.

[22]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Large area plastic solar cell modules , 2007 .

[23]  Helmut Neugebauer,et al.  Flexible, long-lived, large-area, organic solar cells , 2007 .

[24]  Andreas Gombert,et al.  ITO-free wrap through organic solar cells—A module concept for cost-efficient reel-to-reel production , 2007 .

[25]  D. Bradley,et al.  Degradation of organic solar cells due to air exposure , 2006 .

[26]  Niyazi Serdar Sariciftci,et al.  Morphology of polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells , 2006 .

[27]  F. Krebs,et al.  Oxygen Release and Exchange in Niobium Oxide MEHPPV Hybrid Solar Cells , 2006 .

[28]  F. Krebs,et al.  Hybrid solar cells based on MEH-PPV and thin film semiconductor oxides (TiO2, Nb2O5, ZnO, CeO2 and CeO2–TiO2): Performance improvement during long-time irradiation , 2006 .

[29]  F. Krebs,et al.  Lifetimes of organic photovoltaics: photooxidative degradation of a model compound , 2006 .

[30]  Vishal Shrotriya,et al.  Efficient inverted polymer solar cells , 2006 .

[31]  F. Krebs,et al.  High-conductivity large-area semi-transparent electrodes for polymer photovoltaics by silk screen printing and vapour-phase deposition , 2006 .

[32]  F. Krebs,et al.  Lifetimes of organic photovoltaics: Using TOF-SIMS and 18O2 isotopic labelling to characterise chemical degradation mechanisms , 2006 .

[33]  Yang Yang,et al.  High-efficiency solution processable polymer photovoltaic cells by self-organization of polymer blends , 2005 .

[34]  Xiong Gong,et al.  Thermally Stable, Efficient Polymer Solar Cells with Nanoscale Control of the Interpenetrating Network Morphology , 2005 .

[35]  F. Krebs,et al.  Lifetimes of organic photovoltaics: photochemistry, atmosphere effects and barrier layers in ITO-MEHPPV:PCBM-aluminium devices , 2005 .

[36]  Michael D. McGehee,et al.  Conjugated Polymer Photovoltaic Cells , 2004 .

[37]  Niyazi Serdar Sariciftci,et al.  Organic solar cells: An overview , 2004 .

[38]  N. S. Sariciftci,et al.  Patterns of efficiency and degradation of composite polymer solar cells , 2004 .

[39]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  A brief history of the development of organic and polymeric photovoltaics , 2004 .

[40]  Frederik C. Krebs,et al.  Production of large-area polymer solar cells by industrial silk screen printing, lifetime considerations and lamination with polyethyleneterephthalate , 2004 .

[41]  C. Winder,et al.  Low bandgap polymers for photon harvesting in bulk heterojunction solar cells , 2004 .

[42]  Ronn Andriessen,et al.  Printable anodes for flexible organic solar cell modules , 2004 .

[43]  C. Brabec,et al.  Effect of LiF/metal electrodes on the performance of plastic solar cells , 2002 .

[44]  C. Brabec,et al.  Plastic Solar Cells , 2001 .

[45]  Manikandan Jayaraman,et al.  Design, synthesis, and control of conducting polymer architectures: structurally homogeneous poly(3-alkylthiophenes) , 1993 .