Knowledge transfer to the subsidiaries operating in overseas

– The purpose of this paper is to provide information for the companies that pretend to transfer knowledge to their subsidiaries situated in an least developed country (LDC), because of the local operative specificity which is influenced by three analytical dimensions: first, the multinational enterprise's (MNE) ability to transfer knowledge; second, the climate of cooperation between the MNE and its subsidiary; and third, the subsidiary's absorptive capacity., – The present case study deals with three companies with subsidiaries in Mozambique which develop activities in the industrial sector, where the procedures of the analysis of contents are applied in order to answer the research questions., – The results show that the transferred knowledge must be directed at the operational needs felt locally. It must be avoided that the receiver believes the transferred knowledge is imposed by the transmitter, in order for it to be used as an asset in the production of new products, but without reproducing the MNE headquarters' business model because of the specific local context., – The case study method does not allow the results to be generalized, but it permits the investigation of a combination of problems of the phenomenon thus contributing to its better understanding., – The results obtained contribute to a better understanding and greater efficiency of the process of knowledge transfer to the subsidiaries situated in an LDC, taking into consideration the particular characteristics of the local market and the local absorptive capacity.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[2]  Wallace E. Carroll,et al.  Determinants of transnational new product development capability: testing the influence of transferring and deploying tacit overseas knowledge , 2001 .

[3]  Ramaraj Palanisamy,et al.  Organizational Culture and Knowledge Management in ERP Implementation: An Empirical Study , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[4]  D. Leonard,et al.  The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation , 1998 .

[5]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  Aggressively pursuing knowledge management over 2 years: a case study at a US government organization , 2003 .

[6]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[8]  M. Polanyi Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[9]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[10]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[11]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[12]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[13]  Anisya S. Thomas,et al.  Knowledge Transfer through Expatriation: The U-Curve Approach to Overseas Staffing , 2000 .

[14]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[16]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Managing Potential and Realized Absorptive Capacity: How Do Organizational Antecedents Matter? , 2005 .

[17]  Mohammed Saad,et al.  Technology transfer projects in developing countries--furthering the Project Management perspectives , 2002 .

[18]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  R. Parente,et al.  Determinants of cross-national knowledge transfer and its effect on firm innovation , 2007 .

[20]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[21]  Rodney Peter Gapp,et al.  The influence the system of profound knowledge has on the development of leadership and management within an organisation , 2002 .

[22]  Chinho Lin,et al.  The critical factors for technology absorptive capacity , 2002, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[23]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[24]  Wei Wang,et al.  Innovate with Complex Information Technologies: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Examination , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Vesa Suutari,et al.  International knowledge transfers through expatriates , 2004 .

[26]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural Variations in the Cross-Border Transfer of Organizational Knowledge: An Integrative Framework , 2002 .

[27]  Li-Ling Hsu,et al.  The Impact of Industrial Characteristics and Organizational Climate on KMS and Bip-Taiwan Bioscience Industry , 2006, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Valuing Internal vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  A Knowledge Management Strategy for the Jason Organization*: A Case Study , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Victor E. Sower,et al.  Adapting Deming′s Philosophy: An Evaluative Model , 1993 .

[31]  Yen-Ku Kuo,et al.  The Km Chain — Empirical Study of the Vital Knowledge Sourcing Links , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[32]  L. Argote,et al.  The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings , 1990 .

[33]  Eric W. K. Tsang Acquiring Knowledge by Foreign Partners from International Joint Ventures in a Transition Economy: Learning-by-Doing and Learning Myopia , 2002 .

[34]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .