Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study

The investigators studied author research impact using the number of citers per publication an author’s research has been able to attract, as opposed to the more traditional measure of citations. A focus on citers provides a complementary measure of an author’s reach or influence in a field, whereas citations, although possibly numerous, may not reflect this reach, particularly if many citations are received from a small number of citers. In this exploratory study, Web of Science was used to tally citer and citation-based counts for 25 highly cited researchers in information studies in the United States and 26 highly cited researchers from the United Kingdom. Outcomes of the tallies based on several measures, including an introduced ch-index, were used to determine whether differences arise in author rankings when using citer-based versus citation-based counts. The findings indicate a strong correlation between some citation and citer-based measures, but not with others. The findings of the study have implications for the way authors’ research impact may be assessed.

[1]  WILLIAM GOFFMAN,et al.  Mathematical Approach to the Spread of Scientific Ideas—the History of Mast Cell Research , 1966, Nature.

[2]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Howard D. White,et al.  Authors as citers over time , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  B. Cronin,et al.  The web of knowledge: a festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield , 2000 .

[5]  Christina Courtright,et al.  Context in information behavior research , 2007 .

[6]  T. J. Phelan,et al.  A compendium of issues for citation analysis , 1999, Scientometrics.

[7]  Plergiorgio Strata,et al.  Citation analysis , 1995, Nature.

[8]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: Consequences for evaluation studies , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Weigang Wang,et al.  C-index: trust depth, trust breadth, and a collective trust measurement , 2008, WebScience '08.

[10]  D. Dieks,et al.  Differences in Impact of Scientific Publications: Some Indices Derived from a Citation Analysis , 1976 .

[11]  Isola Ajiferuke.  Probabilistic model for distribution of authorships , 1992 .

[12]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989) , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Debora Shaw,et al.  Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place , 2002, Scientometrics.

[14]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[15]  E. Garfield,et al.  Can Citation Indexing Be Automated ? , 1964 .

[16]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianship , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.

[18]  G. Laudel.  What do we measure by co-authorships? , 2002 .

[19]  WILLIAM GOFFMAN,et al.  Generalization of Epidemic Theory: An Application to the Transmission of Ideas , 1964, Nature.

[20]  Denice Adkins,et al.  Scholarly productivity of U.S. LIS faculty , 2006 .

[21]  D. Lindsey,et al.  Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science measuring what's measurable rather than what's valid , 1989, Scientometrics.

[22]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  B. Cronin,et al.  Citation-Based Auditing of Academic Performance , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis: A critical review , 1989, JASIS.

[25]  Dangzhi Zhao,et al.  Towards all-author co-citation analysis , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[26]  M. White,et al.  A Qualitative Study of Citing Behavior: Contributions, Criteria, and Metalevel Documentation Concerns , 1997, The Library Quarterly.

[27]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Citation-Based Auditing of Academic Performance , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing , 1963 .

[29]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations , 1985, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..