Building Resilience and Adaptation to Manage Arctic Change

Abstract Unprecedented global changes caused by human actions challenge society's ability to sustain the desirable features of our planet. This requires proactive management of change to foster both resilience (sustaining those attributes that are important to society in the face of change) and adaptation (developing new socioecological configurations that function effectively under new conditions). The Arctic may be one of the last remaining opportunities to plan for change in a spatially extensive region where many of the ancestral ecological and social processes and feedbacks are still intact. If the feasibility of this strategy can be demonstrated in the Arctic, our improved understanding of the dynamics of change can be applied to regions with greater human modification. Conditions may now be ideal to implement policies to manage Arctic change because recent studies provide the essential scientific understanding, appropriate international institutions are in place, and Arctic nations have the wealth to institute necessary changes, if they choose to do so.

[1]  R. Crawford,et al.  The tundra-taiga interface and its dynamics: concepts and applications. , 2002, Ambio.

[2]  C. Folke,et al.  Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems , 2004, Environmental management.

[3]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  F. Berkes,et al.  Collaborative Integrated Management in Canada's North: The Role of Local and Traditional Knowledge and Community-Based Monitoring , 2007 .

[5]  Robert J. Scholes,et al.  The Carbon Cycle and Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 2001 .

[6]  Carl Folke,et al.  The Dynamics of Ecosystems, Biodiversity Management and Social Institutions at High Northern Latitudes , 2004, Ambio.

[7]  T Elmqvist,et al.  Resilience and Vulnerability of Northern Regions to Social and Environmental Change , 2004, Ambio.

[8]  R. Scholes,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends , 2005 .

[9]  C. Symon,et al.  Arctic climate impact assessment , 2005 .

[10]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Breaking ice : renewable resource and ocean management in the Canadian North , 2005 .

[11]  Igor Krupnik,et al.  The Earth Is Faster Now: Indigenous Observations of Arctic Environmental Change. Frontiers in Polar Social Science. , 2002 .

[12]  M. Price.  Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2003 .

[13]  David Downie,et al.  Northern lights against POPs : combatting toxic threats in the Arctic , 2003 .

[14]  W. Oechel,et al.  Observational Evidence of Recent Change in the Northern High-Latitude Environment , 2000 .

[15]  F. Chapin,et al.  Evidence and Implications of Recent Climate Change in Northern Alaska and Other Arctic Regions , 2004 .

[16]  Yves Bergeron,et al.  Global Change and the Boreal Forest: Thresholds, Shifting States or Gradual Change? , 2004, Ambio.

[17]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Struggle to Govern the Commons , 2003, Science.

[18]  C. Folke,et al.  Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change: Fikret Berkes, Johan Colding and Carl Folke (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, 2003. xxi + 393 pages. ISBN 0-521-81592-4 (hardback), £65 , 2004 .

[19]  C. Folke,et al.  ADAPTIVE CO-MANAGEMENT FOR BUILDING RESILIENCE IN SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2003 .

[20]  W. Steffen,et al.  Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure , 2005 .

[21]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Planning for resilience: modeling change in human–fire interactions in the Alaskan boreal forest , 2003 .

[22]  Henry P. Huntington,et al.  Directional Changes in Ecological Communities and Social‐Ecological Systems: A Framework for Prediction Based on Alaskan Examples , 2006, The American Naturalist.