Autistic trait interactions underlie sex-dependent facial recognition abilities in the normal population

Autistic face processing difficulties are either uniquely social or due to a piecemeal cognitive “style.” Co-morbidity of social deficits and piecemeal cognition in autism makes teasing apart these accounts difficult. These traits vary normally, and are more separable in the general population, suggesting another way to compare accounts. Participants completed the Autism Quotient survey of autistic traits, and one of three face recognition tests: full-face, eyes-only, or mouth-only. Social traits predicted performance in the full-face condition in both sexes. Eyes-only males' performance was predicted by a social × cognitive trait interaction: attention to detail boosted face recognition in males with few social traits, but hindered performance in those reporting many social traits. This suggests social/non-social Autism Spectrum Conditions (ASC) trait interactions at the behavioral level. In the presence of few ASC-like difficulties in social reciprocity, an ASC-like attention to detail may confer advantages on typical males' face recognition skills. On the other hand, when attention to detail co-occurs with difficulties in social reciprocity, a detailed focus may exacerbate such already present social difficulties, as is thought to occur in autism.

[1]  W. Alexander American psychiatric association. , 2008, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[2]  Mark T. Waters,et al.  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourcearecredited.Thislicensedoesnot permit commercial exploitation or the creation of derivative works without sp , 2009 .

[3]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Systemizing empathy: Teaching adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism to recognize complex emotions using interactive multimedia , 2006, Development and Psychopathology.

[4]  F. Volkmar,et al.  Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  Matthew K. Belmonte,et al.  Detail-oriented cognitive style and social communicative deficits, within and beyond the autism spectrum: Independent traits that grow into developmental interdependence , 2013 .

[6]  J. Dawson,et al.  Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Combining strengths and weaknesses in visual perception of children with an autism spectrum disorder: Perceptual matching of facial expressions , 2011 .

[8]  J. Constantino,et al.  Autistic traits in the general population: a twin study. , 2003, Archives of general psychiatry.

[9]  E. Austin Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) , 2005 .

[10]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[11]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Malesand Females, Scientists and Mathematicians , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[12]  Matthew K. Belmonte,et al.  More than maths and mindreading: Sex differences in empathizing/systemizing covariance , 2010, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[13]  G. Dawson,et al.  Understanding the Nature of Face Processing Impairment in Autism: Insights From Behavioral and Electrophysiological Studies , 2005, Developmental neuropsychology.

[14]  Stephen J. Ceci,et al.  Can Sex Differences in Science Be Tied to the Long Reach of Prenatal Hormones? Brain Organization Theory, Digit Ratio (2D/4D), and Sex Differences in Preferences and Cognition , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[15]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[16]  Kim M. Dalton,et al.  Gaze fixation and the neural circuitry of face processing in autism , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  S. Ceci,et al.  Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Paul D. Ellsworth,et al.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder , 1980 .

[19]  F. Happé,et al.  Time to give up on a single explanation for autism , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Michael Murias,et al.  The Role of Face Familiarity in Eye Tracking of Faces by Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2008, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[21]  M. Voracek,et al.  Lack of correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and Baron-Cohen's "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test, empathy, systemising, and autism-spectrum quotients in a general population sample. , 2006 .

[22]  Christopher F. Chabris,et al.  Activation of the fusiform gyrus when individuals with autism spectrum disorder view faces , 2004, NeuroImage.