Biokinetic Modeling and in Vitro–in Vivo Extrapolations

The introduction of in vitro methodologies in the toxicological risk assessment process requires a number of prerequisites regarding both the toxicodynamics and the biokinetics of the compounds under study. In vitro systems will need to be relevant for measuring those structural and physiological changes that are good indicators for adverse effects. Furthermore, the dose metric found to have an effect in the in vitro system should be relevant. One element in defining the appropriate dose metric is related to the kinetic behavior of the compound in the in vitro system: binding to proteins, binding to plastic, evaporation, and the interaction between the culture medium and the cells. Ways to measure and model “in vitro biokinetics” are described. Second, the appropriate dose metric in vitro, e.g., the effective concentration, will need to be extrapolated to relevant in vivo exposure scenarios. The application of physiologically based biokinetic modelling is essential in such extrapolations. The parameters needed to build these models often can be estimated based on nonanimal data, namely chemical properties (QSARs) and in vitro experiments.

[1]  Andreas P. Freidig,et al.  Use of Physiologically Based Biokinetic (PBBK) Modeling to Study Estragole Bioactivation and Detoxification in Humans as Compared with Male Rats , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  W. Russell,et al.  Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  M Balls,et al.  Novel Advanced In Vitro Methods for Long-term Toxicity Testing , 2001, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[4]  Trese Leinders-Zufall,et al.  Metal interactions with voltage- and receptor-activated ion channels. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Hasso Seibert,et al.  Impact of protein binding on the availability and cytotoxic potency of organochlorine pesticides and chlorophenols in vitro. , 2002, Toxicology.

[6]  J B Houston,et al.  The Integrated Use of Alternative Methods in Toxicological Risk Evaluation , 1999, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[7]  Steven K. Gibb Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. , 2008, Reproductive toxicology.

[8]  Minne B Heringa,et al.  Toward more useful in vitro toxicity data with measured free concentrations. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  G Maranelli,et al.  Partition coefficients of some industrial aliphatic hydrocarbons (C5-C7) in blood and human tissues. , 1985, British journal of industrial medicine.

[10]  R. de Kanter,et al.  Prediction of whole-body metabolic clearance of drugs through the combined use of slices from rat liver, lung, kidney, small intestine and colon , 2004, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[11]  Anna Forsby,et al.  Blood-brain barrier in vitro models and their application in toxicology - The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 49 , 2004 .

[12]  A Sato,et al.  A structure-activity relationship of some chlorinated hydrocarbons. , 1979, Archives of environmental health.

[13]  Maxime Culot,et al.  New strategy for alerting central nervous system toxicity: Integration of blood-brain barrier toxicity and permeability in neurotoxicity assessment. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[14]  M E Andersen,et al.  Partition coefficients of low-molecular-weight volatile chemicals in various liquids and tissues. , 1989, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[15]  M Balls,et al.  Methods of in vitro toxicology. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[16]  J. DeJongh,et al.  A quantitative property-property relationship (QPPR) approach to estimate in vitro tissue-blood partition coefficients of organic chemicals in rats and humans , 1997, Archives of Toxicology.

[17]  X. Ronot,et al.  Flow cytometric assessment of cell viability: a multifaceted analysis , 1989, Cytotechnology.

[18]  G M Pacifici,et al.  Methods of Determining Plasma and Tissue Binding of Drugs , 1992, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[19]  Ans Punt,et al.  Differences in simulated liver concentrations of toxic coumarin metabolites in rats and different human populations evaluated through physiologically based biokinetic (PBBK) modeling. , 2008, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[20]  J. Hermens,et al.  Influence of albumin on sorption kinetics in solid-phase microextraction: consequences for chemical analyses and uptake processes. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[21]  Johannes J M van de Sandt,et al.  Prediction of in vivo embryotoxic effect levels with a combination of in vitro studies and PBPK modelling. , 2006, Toxicology letters.

[22]  Wytse J. Wadman,et al.  Health Council of the Netherlands: No need to change from SAR to time-temperature relation in electromagnetic fields exposure limits , 2011, International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group.

[23]  R. Stierum,et al.  A toxicogenomics-based parallelogram approach to evaluate the relevance of coumarin-induced responses in primary human hepatocytes in vitro for humans in vivo. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[24]  D. Breimer,et al.  Permeability enhancement in Caco-2 cell monolayers by sodium salicylate and sodium taurodihydrofusidate: assessment of effect-reversibility and imaging of transepithelial transport routes by confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 1993, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[25]  G W Jepson,et al.  A partition coefficient determination method for nonvolatile chemicals in biological tissues. , 1994, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[26]  C. Duggan,et al.  The use of genomics technology to investigate gene expression changes in cultured human liver cells. , 2001, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[27]  Andrew Worth,et al.  Metabolism: A Bottleneck in In Vitro Toxicological Test Development , 2006, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[28]  B J Blaauboer,et al.  Comparison of cytochrome P450 isoenzyme profiles in rat liver and hepatocyte cultures. The effects of model inducers on apoproteins and biotransformation activities. , 1991, Biochemical pharmacology.

[29]  R. de Kanter,et al.  Precision-cut organ slices as a tool to study toxicity and metabolism of xenobiotics with special reference to non-hepatic tissues. , 2002, Current drug metabolism.

[30]  Hasso Seibert,et al.  In vitro-in vivo extrapolation: estimation of human serum concentrations of chemicals equivalent to cytotoxic concentrations in vitro. , 2003, Toxicology.

[31]  Vera Fiserova-Bergerova,et al.  Determination and prediction of tissue-gas partition coefficients , 1986, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[32]  K Rowland-Yeo,et al.  Prediction of metabolic drug clearance in humans: In vitro–in vivo extrapolation vs allometric scaling , 2006, Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems.

[33]  P. Schmezer,et al.  Detection of genotoxic effects in human gastric and nasal mucosa cells isolated from biopsy samples , 1994, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[34]  John D. Walker,et al.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[35]  Melvin E. Andersen,et al.  The need for a new toxicity testing and risk analysis paradigm to implement REACH or any other large scale testing initiative , 2006, Archives of Toxicology.

[36]  P. Olinga,et al.  Liver fibrosis in vitro: cell culture models and precision-cut liver slices. , 2007, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[37]  Robert Combes,et al.  An Overall Strategy for the Testing of Chemicals for Human Hazard and Risk Assessment under the EU REACH System , 2003, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[38]  J. Hermens,et al.  The influence of modes of action and physicochemical properties of chemicals on the correlation between in vitro and acute fish toxicity data. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[39]  J. Trent,et al.  Microarrays and toxicology: The advent of toxicogenomics , 1999, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[40]  R. Tennant,et al.  13th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals (SGOMSEC): alternative testing methodologies and conceptual issues. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[41]  Philip Judson,et al.  Predicting Drug Metabolism – An Evaluation of the Expert System METEOR , 2005, Chemistry & biodiversity.

[42]  M. Barratt The Role of Structure-activity Relationships and Expert Systems in Alternative Strategies for the Determination of Skin Sensitisation, Skin Corrosivity and Eye Irritation , 1995 .

[43]  Hanneke van Helvoort,et al.  THE USE OF SANDWICH-CULTURED RAT HEPATOCYTES TO DETERMINE THE INTRINSIC CLEARANCE OF COMPOUNDS WITH DIFFERENT EXTRACTION RATIOS: 7-ETHOXYCOUMARIN AND WARFARIN , 2005, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[44]  B. Blaauboer Biokinetic and Toxicodynamic Modelling and its Role in Toxicological Research and Risk Assessment , 2003, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[45]  Ursula Gundert-Remy,et al.  Physiologically-based Kinetic Modelling (PBK Modelling): Meeting the 3Rs Agenda , 2007, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[46]  J. DeJongh,et al.  Estimation of systemic toxicity of acrylamide by integration of in vitro toxicity data with kinetic simulations. , 1999, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[47]  P. Artursson,et al.  Determination of drug permeability and prediction of drug absorption in Caco-2 monolayers , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[48]  Wout Slob,et al.  A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: what is the added value of the second generation? , 2007, Reproductive toxicology.

[49]  K. Krishnan,et al.  A tissue composition-based algorithm for predicting tissue:air partition coefficients of organic chemicals. , 1996, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[50]  Worth Andrew,et al.  Alternative (Non-Animal) Methods for Chemicals Testing: Current Status and Future Prospects (A Report Prepared by ECVAM and the ECVAM WG on Chemicals) , 2002 .

[51]  Anna Forsby,et al.  Integration of in vitro neurotoxicity data with biokinetic modelling for the estimation of in vivo neurotoxicity , 2007, Human & experimental toxicology.

[52]  E. Walum,et al.  Cellular methods for identification of neurotoxic chemicals and estimation of neurotoxicological risk. , 1993, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[53]  Helmut Greim,et al.  Toxicological comments to the discussion about REACH , 2006, Archives of Toxicology.

[54]  N. Kramer,et al.  Measuring, modeling, and increasing the free Concentration of test Chemicals in cell assays , 2010 .

[55]  B J Blaauboer,et al.  An alternative approach for the safety evaluation of new and existing chemicals, an exercise in integrated testing. , 2005, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[56]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[57]  J. Hermens,et al.  Computer-modeling-based QSARs for analyzing experimental data on biotransformation and toxicity. , 2001, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[58]  Michael Balls,et al.  ECITTS: An Integrated Approach to the Application of In Vitro Test Systems to the Hazard Assessment of Chemicals 1 , 2 , 1992 .

[59]  J. Houston,et al.  Incorporation of in vitro drug metabolism data into physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. , 1997, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[60]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Meeting Report: Validation of Toxicogenomics-Based Test Systems: ECVAM–ICCVAM/NICEATM Considerations for Regulatory Use , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[61]  F. H. Sobels,et al.  Evaluating the mutagenic potential of chemicals the minimal battery and extrapolation problems , 1980, Archives of Toxicology.

[62]  Robert Combes,et al.  Integrated Decision-tree Testing Strategies for Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity with Respect to the Requirements of the EU REACH Legislation , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.