S1P–S1PR2 Axis Mediates Homing of Muse Cells Into Damaged Heart for Long-Lasting Tissue Repair and Functional Recovery After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Rationale: Multilineage-differentiating stress enduring (Muse) cells, pluripotent marker stage-specific embryonic antigen-3+ cells, are nontumorigenic endogenous pluripotent-like stem cells obtainable from various tissues including the bone marrow. Their therapeutic efficiency has not been validated in acute myocardial infarction. Objective: The main objective of this study is to clarify the efficiency of intravenously infused rabbit autograft, allograft, and xenograft (human) bone marrow-Muse cells in a rabbit acute myocardial infarction model and their mechanisms of tissue repair. Methods and Results: In vivo dynamics of Nano-lantern–labeled Muse cells showed preferential homing of the cells to the postinfarct heart at 3 days and 2 weeks, with ≈14.5% of injected GFP (green fluorescent protein)-Muse cells estimated to be engrafted into the heart at 3 days. The migration and homing of the Muse cells was confirmed pharmacologically (S1PR2 [sphingosine monophosphate receptor 2]–specific antagonist JTE-013 coinjection) and genetically (S1PR2-siRNA [small interfering ribonucleic acid]–introduced Muse cells) to be mediated through the S1P (sphingosine monophosphate)–S1PR2 axis. They spontaneously differentiated into cells positive for cardiac markers, such as cardiac troponin-I, sarcomeric &agr;-actinin, and connexin-43, and vascular markers. GCaMP3 (GFP-based Ca calmodulin probe)-labeled Muse cells that engrafted into the ischemic region exhibited increased GCaMP3 fluorescence during systole and decreased fluorescence during diastole. Infarct size was reduced by ≈52%, and the ejection fraction was increased by ≈38% compared with vehicle injection at 2 months, ≈2.5 and ≈2.1 times higher, respectively, than that induced by mesenchymal stem cells. These effects were partially attenuated by the administration of GATA4-gene–silenced Muse cells. Muse cell allografts and xenografts efficiently engrafted and recovered functions, and allografts remained in the tissue and sustained functional recovery for up to 6 months without immunosuppression. Conclusions: Muse cells may provide reparative effects and robust functional recovery and may, thus, provide a novel strategy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

[1]  Leonardo Ferreira HLA-G and immune tolerance in pregnancy , 2018 .

[2]  Y. Kondo,et al.  Beneficial Effects of Systemically Administered Human Muse Cells in Adriamycin Nephropathy. , 2017, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[3]  F. Motoi,et al.  Human Muse Cells, Nontumorigenic Phiripotent-Like Stem Cells, Have Liver Regeneration Capacity through Specific Homing and Cell Replacement in a Mouse Model of Liver Fibrosis , 2017, Cell transplantation.

[4]  T. Tominaga,et al.  Human Muse Cells Reconstruct Neuronal Circuitry in Subacute Lacunar Stroke Model , 2017, Stroke.

[5]  U. Galderisi,et al.  The secretome of MUSE cells contains factors that may play a role in regulation of stemness, apoptosis and immunomodulation , 2017, Cell cycle.

[6]  S. Kuroda,et al.  Mobilization of Pluripotent Multilineage-Differentiating Stress-Enduring Cells in Ischemic Stroke. , 2016, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[7]  K. Kume,et al.  A Distinct Subpopulation of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Muse Cells, Directly Commit to the Replacement of Liver Components , 2016, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[8]  H. Mushiake,et al.  Transplantation of Unique Subpopulation of Fibroblasts, Muse Cells, Ameliorates Experimental Stroke Possibly via Robust Neuronal Differentiation , 2016, Stem cells.

[9]  A. Kurisaki,et al.  Tissue-Specific Progenitor and Stem Cells Therapeutic Potential of Adipose-Derived SSEA-3-Positive Muse Cells for Treating Diabetic Skin Ulcers , 2015 .

[10]  R. Rizzo,et al.  HLA-G Molecules in Autoimmune Diseases and Infections , 2014, Front. Immunol..

[11]  Setsuya Aiba,et al.  Human adipose tissue possesses a unique population of pluripotent stem cells with nontumorigenic and low telomerase activities: potential implications in regenerative medicine. , 2014, Stem cells and development.

[12]  J. Alijotas-Reig,et al.  Potentiating maternal immune tolerance in pregnancy: a new challenging role for regulatory T cells. , 2014, Placenta.

[13]  M. Ratajczak,et al.  The role of sphingosine-1 phosphate and ceramide-1 phosphate in trafficking of normal stem cells and cancer cells , 2014, Expert opinion on therapeutic targets.

[14]  M. Dezawa,et al.  Isolation, culture and evaluation of multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[15]  N. Zavazava,et al.  Human iPS cell-derived hematopoietic progenitor cells induce T-cell anergy in in vitro-generated alloreactive CD8(+) T cells. , 2013, Blood.

[16]  Xinmin Li,et al.  Awakened by Cellular Stress: Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Population of Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived from Human Adipose Tissue , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  S. Khosla,et al.  Sphingosine 1-Phosphate (S1P) Receptors 1 and 2 Coordinately Induce Mesenchymal Cell Migration through S1P Activation of Complementary Kinase Pathways* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  Takeharu Nagai,et al.  Luminescent proteins for high-speed single-cell and whole-body imaging , 2012, Nature Communications.

[19]  Y. Fujiyoshi,et al.  Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are a primary source of induced pluripotent stem cells in human fibroblasts , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  Bone marrow-derived cell therapy stimulates endogenous cardiomyocyte progenitors and promotes cardiac repair. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[21]  R. Matsuoka,et al.  c-kitpos GATA-4 High Rat Cardiac Stem Cells Foster Adult Cardiomyocyte Survival through IGF-1 Paracrine Signalling , 2010, PloS one.

[22]  A. Inutsuka,et al.  Unique multipotent cells in adult human mesenchymal cell populations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  J. George Stem cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction: a review of clinical trials. , 2010, Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[24]  J. Roncalli,et al.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells Promote Matrix Metalloproteinase Secretion by Cardiac Fibroblasts and Reduce Cardiac Ventricular Fibrosis After Myocardial Infarction , 2009, Stem cells.

[25]  S. Brunskill,et al.  Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  M. Arai,et al.  In vivo hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through its multiple actions. , 2007, Journal of cardiac failure.

[27]  L. Fouillard,et al.  Immunosuppressive Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Involvement of HLA-G , 2007, Transplantation.

[28]  H. Zhang,et al.  Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow improves damaged heart function in rats. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[29]  O. Kollet,et al.  Mutual, reciprocal SDF-1/CXCR4 interactions between hematopoietic and bone marrow stromal cells regulate human stem cell migration and development in NOD/SCID chimeric mice. , 2006, Experimental hematology.

[30]  Robert L Wilensky,et al.  A quantitative, randomized study evaluating three methods of mesenchymal stem cell delivery following myocardial infarction. , 2006, European heart journal.

[31]  E. Goetzl,et al.  Sphingosine 1-phosphate and its receptors: an autocrine and paracrine network , 2005, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[32]  H. Ohgushi,et al.  Intravenous administration of mesenchymal stem cells improves cardiac function in rats with acute myocardial infarction through angiogenesis and myogenesis. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[33]  M. Arai,et al.  Acceleration of the Healing Process and Myocardial Regeneration May Be Important as a Mechanism of Improvement of Cardiac Function and Remodeling by Postinfarction Granulocyte Colony–Stimulating Factor Treatment , 2004, Circulation.

[34]  T. Ohmori,et al.  Enhancement of sphingosine 1-phosphate-induced migration of vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells by an EDG-5 antagonist. , 2002, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[35]  Qingbo Xu,et al.  Plasma cardiac troponin T closely correlates with infarct size in a mouse model of acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[36]  Maya Schuldiner,et al.  Characterization of the expression of MHC proteins in human embryonic stem cells , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  J. Dausset,et al.  Human Leukocyte Antigen-G Expression After Heart Transplantation Is Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Rejection , 2002, Circulation.

[38]  J. Isner,et al.  Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis as therapeutic strategies for postnatal neovascularization. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[39]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Experimental Observations and Clinical Implications , 1990, Circulation.

[40]  S. Papson,et al.  “Model” , 1981 .