NMR analysis of the binding of a rhodanese peptide to a minichaperone in solution.

A detailed structural analysis of interactions between denatured proteins and GroEL is essential for an understanding of its mechanism. Minichaperones constitute an excellent paradigm for obtaining high-resolution structural information about the binding site and conformation of substrates bound to GroEL, and are particularly suitable for NMR studies. Here, we used transferred nuclear Overhauser effects to study the interaction in solution between minichaperone GroEL(193-335) and a synthetic peptide (Rho), corresponding to the N-terminal alpha-helix (residues 11 to 23) of the mitochondrial rhodanese, a protein whose in vitro refolding is mediated by minichaperones. Using a 60 kDa maltose-binding protein (MBP)-GroEL(193-335) fusion protein to increase the sensitivity of the transferred NOEs, we observed characteristic sequential and mid-range transferred nuclear Overhauser effects. The peptide adopts an alpha-helical conformation upon binding to the minichaperone. Thus the binding site of GroEL is compatible with binding of alpha-helices as well as extended beta-strands. To locate the peptide-binding site on GroEL(193-335), we analysed changes in its chemical shifts on adding an excess of Rho peptide. All residues with significant chemical shift differences are localised in helices H8 and H9. Non-specific interactions were not observed. This indicates that the peptide Rho binds specifically to minichaperone GroEL(193-335). The binding region identified by NMR in solution agrees with crystallographic studies with small peptides and with fluorescence quenching studies with denatured proteins.

[1]  M. Billeter,et al.  MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[2]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES , 1993, Nature.

[3]  G. Lorimer,et al.  A quantitative assessment of the role of the chaperonin proteins in protein folding in vivo , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[4]  A. Fersht,et al.  Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  A. Fersht,et al.  Minimal and optimal mechanisms for GroE-mediated protein folding. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[7]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  A. Horovitz Structural aspects of GroEL function. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Theory of the time dependent transferred nuclear Overhauser effect: Applications to structural analysis of ligand-protein complexes in solution , 1983 .

[10]  A. Fersht,et al.  In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Helen R Saibil,et al.  The Chaperonin ATPase Cycle: Mechanism of Allosteric Switching and Movements of Substrate-Binding Domains in GroEL , 1996, Cell.

[12]  J. Walker,et al.  Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[14]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Theory and applications of the transferred nuclear overhauser effect to the study of the conformations of small ligands bound to proteins , 1982 .

[15]  A. Horwich,et al.  GroEL‐Mediated protein folding , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  Roger W. Hendrix,et al.  Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly , 1988, Nature.

[17]  L. Kay,et al.  An HNCA Pulse Scheme for the Backbone Assignment of 15N,13C,2H-Labeled Proteins: Application to a 37-kDa Trp Repressor-DNA Complex , 1994 .

[18]  A. Fersht,et al.  Catalysis of Amide Proton Exchange by the Molecular Chaperones GroEL and SecB , 1996, Science.

[19]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[20]  K. Wüthrich NMR of proteins and nucleic acids , 1988 .

[21]  Alan R. Fersht,et al.  Oxidative refolding chromatography: folding of the scorpion toxin Cn5 , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  F. Hartl,et al.  Principles of protein folding in the cellular environment. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  A. Fersht,et al.  A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[25]  L. Gierasch,et al.  Different conformations for the same polypeptide bound to chaperones DnaK and GroEL , 1992, Nature.

[26]  A. Fersht,et al.  Chaperone activity and structure of monomeric polypeptide binding domains of GroEL. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  V. Saudek,et al.  Gradient-tailored excitation for single-quantum NMR spectroscopy of aqueous solutions , 1992, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[28]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[29]  S W Englander,et al.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. , 1999, Science.

[30]  B D Sykes,et al.  The two-dimensional transferred nuclear Overhauser effect: theory and practice. , 1993, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[31]  L. Gierasch,et al.  The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[32]  A. Fersht,et al.  GroEL recognises sequential and non-sequential linear structural motifs compatible with extended beta-strands and alpha-helices. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  A. Fersht,et al.  Identification of substrate binding site of GroEL minichaperone in solution. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Weontae Lee,et al.  A Suite of Triple Resonance NMR Experiments for the Backbone Assignment of 15N, 13C, 2H Labeled Proteins with High Sensitivity , 1994 .