Spatial power indices with applications on real voting data from the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Parliament

Participants in parliamentary voting—usually political parties—are evaluated with a value that assigns them predicted power with respect to their strength by so called power indices. However, in real world, political parties’ representatives act not strictly as predicted in theory. One possibility how the representatives differ from theory is the way they form coalitions; the coalitions can be announced (for example official governmental coalition parties in multiparty parliaments) or hidden. To incorporate the coalition forming influence, Bilal et al. (http://aei.pitt.edu/2052/1/001591_1.pdf, 2001) proposed to consider additional weights to possible coalitions into power indices. This article applies the concept of additional weights to calculate an ex post power distribution using Shapley–Shubik power index together with Banzhaf power index on real voting data, namely the data from the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Parliament with the emphasis on the State Budget voting issues during 2006–2010 parliamentary period.

[1]  Xingwei Hu,et al.  An Asymmetric Shapley–Shubik Power Index , 2006, Int. J. Game Theory.

[2]  L. Penrose The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting , 1946 .

[3]  G. Owen VALUES OF GAMES WITH A PRIORI UNIONS , 1977 .

[4]  D. Rae,et al.  Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[5]  Martin Shubik,et al.  A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System , 1954, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Josep Freixas,et al.  Weighted voting, abstention, and multiple levels of approval , 2003, Soc. Choice Welf..

[7]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[8]  Francesco Passarelli,et al.  Who has the power in the EU? , 2009, Math. Soc. Sci..

[9]  Josep Freixas,et al.  Success and decisiveness on proper symmetric games , 2015, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Gianfranco Gambarelli,et al.  Multicameral voting cohesion games , 2009, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  G. Owen,et al.  Optimal location of candidates in ideological space , 1989 .

[12]  Martha Saboyá,et al.  On the relationship between Shapley and Owen values , 2009, Central Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Stefano Benati,et al.  Probabilistic spatial power indexes , 2011, Social Choice and Welfare.

[14]  Hans Haller,et al.  Collusion properties of values , 1994 .