Learning from a benign neglect strategy in a national park: Response of saproxylic beetles to dead wood accumulation

Abstract Increasing demands for firewood owing to rising energy costs have accelerated discussions about the amount of dead wood needed for conservation. A sharp increase in dead wood caused by bark beetles in a German national park provides lessons for management of commercial and protected forests. We investigated the effects of dead wood due to bark beetle infestation as well as tree senility on abundance and richness of saproxylic species of beetles. Increasing amounts of spruce dead wood and opening of the canopy by bark beetles had positive effects on the abundance of host-generalist, conifer-specialist, and red-listed saproxylic beetles. Broadleaf specialists were positively associated with the amount of broadleaf dead wood and negatively associated with canopy openness. Gradient analysis of beetle assemblages revealed two major environmental axes: canopy openness and amount of dead wood. We found a threshold for community divergence at a canopy openness of 23% (confidence interval CI: 11–49) and at an amount of dead wood of 64 m3 ha−1 (CI: 35–160). Critically endangered species served as indicators of dense and open forests, but only when the amount of dead wood was high. Our results suggest that, to maintain saproxylic beetle assemblages, the amount of dead wood in commercial montane forests (at present ≈15 m3 ha−1) needs to be tripled, with a focus on broadleaf wood in dense stands and spruce wood in open stands. For large protected areas in Europe, our data suggest that bark beetle infestation and senescence without active forest management improves habitat conditions for saproxylic beetles.

[1]  A. Pullin,et al.  Are current management recommendations for conserving saproxylic invertebrates effective? Systematic Review No. 17. , 2006 .

[2]  L. Wikars Habitat requirements of the pine wood-living beetle Tragosoma depsarium (Cole?ptera: Cerambycidae) at log, stand, and landscape scale , 2004 .

[3]  C. Körner The use of 'altitude' in ecological research. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  J. Hicke,et al.  Cross-scale Drivers of Natural Disturbances Prone to Anthropogenic Amplification: The Dynamics of Bark Beetle Eruptions , 2008 .

[5]  J. Müller,et al.  Molluscs and Climate Warming in a Low Mountain Range National Park , 2009 .

[6]  M. Jonsell Effects on biodiversity of forest fuel extraction, governed by processes working on a large scale , 2007 .

[7]  J. Agee Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests , 1993 .

[8]  Simon J. Grove,et al.  Saproxylic Insect Ecology and the Sustainable Management of Forests , 2002 .

[9]  J. Grégoire,et al.  Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis , 2004, Springer Netherlands.

[10]  J. Lawton,et al.  Why More Productive Sites Have More Species: An Experimental Test of Theory Using Tree‐Hole Communities , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[11]  B. Klausnitzer,et al.  Die Käfer Mitteleuropas , 2012 .

[12]  Per Angelstam,et al.  Dead wood threshold values for the three-toed woodpecker presence in boreal and sub-alpine forest , 2004 .

[13]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data : a review , 2007 .

[14]  W. Falck,et al.  Nonparametric spatial covariance functions: Estimation and testing , 2001, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[15]  Pereira,et al.  Plant diversity and productivity experiments in european grasslands , 1999, Science.

[16]  Bengt Gunnar Jonsson,et al.  Ecology of Species Living on Dead Wood - Lessons for Dead Wood Management , 2005 .

[17]  A. Lynch,et al.  Nowhere to run and nowhere to hide: Response of endemic Mt. Graham red squirrels to catastrophic forest damage , 2005 .

[18]  M. Villard Setting Conservation Targets for Managed Forest Landscapes: Designing studies to develop conservation targets: a review of the challenges , 2009 .

[19]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[20]  David W. Williams,et al.  Climate change and the outbreak ranges of two North American bark beetles , 2002 .

[21]  A. Pullin,et al.  Are current management recommendations for saproxylic invertebrates effective? A systematic review , 2007, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[22]  P. Meyer,et al.  Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves , 2005 .

[23]  Anna Maria Jönsson,et al.  Spatio‐temporal impact of climate change on the activity and voltinism of the spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus , 2009 .

[24]  J. Müller,et al.  Critical forest age thresholds for the diversity of lichens, molluscs and birds in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) dominated forests , 2009 .

[25]  D R Foster,et al.  Salvage Harvesting Policies After Natural Disturbance , 2004, Science.

[26]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Synthesis: Thresholds in conservation and management , 2005 .

[27]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .

[28]  J. Kouki,et al.  Sampling the rarest: threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiversity inventories , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[29]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Maximally selected two-sample statistics as a new tool for the identification and assessment of habitat factors with an application to breeding-bird communities in oak forests , 2004, European Journal of Forest Research.

[30]  M. Karlsson,et al.  Natural regeneration of Norway spruce, Scots pine and birch under Norway spruce shelterwoods of varying densities on a mesic-dry site in southern Sweden , 2002 .

[31]  M. Moretti,et al.  The effects of wildfires on wood-eating beetles in deciduous forests on the southern slope of the Swiss Alps , 2004 .

[32]  T. Paine,et al.  Interactions among Scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers. , 1997, Annual review of entomology.

[33]  J. Buse,et al.  An Endangered Longhorn Beetle Associated with Old Oaks and Its Possible Role as an Ecosystem Engineer , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[34]  P. Beier,et al.  Recommendations for Integrating Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology in Ponderosa Pine Forests of the Southwestern United States , 2006 .

[35]  H. Gibb,et al.  Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: Responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates , 2006 .

[36]  Thomas Parker,et al.  Interactions among fire, insects and pathogens in coniferous forests of the interior western United States and Canada , 2006 .

[37]  P. Drapeau,et al.  Bridging ecosystem and multiple species approaches for setting conservation targets in managed boreal landscapes , 2001 .

[38]  J. Kouki,et al.  Fire and Green‐Tree Retention in Conservation of Red‐Listed and Rare Deadwood‐Dependent Beetles in Finnish Boreal Forests , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[39]  Martin Müller,et al.  Managing natural disturbance in protected areas: tourists' attitude towards the bark beetle in a German national park. , 2009 .

[40]  J. Kouki,et al.  Saproxylic beetles in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: quality of dead wood matters , 2003 .

[41]  C. Bouget,et al.  The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review , 2004 .

[42]  J. Müller,et al.  The BIOKLIM Project: Biodiversity Research between Climate Change and Wilding in a temperate montane forest - The conceptual framework , 2009 .

[43]  K. Prach,et al.  Central-European mountain spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) forests: regeneration of tree species after a bark beetle outbreak , 2004 .

[44]  B. Schröder,et al.  Predicting the occurrence of Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius on a regional scale, using forest inventory data , 2009 .

[45]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance in ecology , 2001 .

[46]  M. Obrist,et al.  Windthrow-induced changes in faunistic biodiversity in alpine spruce forests , 2002 .

[47]  Derek A. Roff,et al.  Introduction to Computer-Intensive Methods of Data Analysis in Biology: Preface , 2006 .

[48]  Roland Brandl,et al.  Assessing biodiversity by remote sensing in mountainous terrain: the potential of LiDAR to predict forest beetle assemblages , 2009 .

[49]  J. Müller,et al.  Effects of resource availability and climate on the diversity of wood‐decaying fungi , 2010 .

[50]  E. Stokstad Salvage Logging Research Continues to Generate Sparks , 2006, Science.

[51]  F. Hieke Freude, H., Harde, K. W., & Lohse, G. A.: Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Band 7, Clavicornia. — Krefeld (Verlag Goecke u. Evers) 1967; 310 S., mit zahlreichen Abb. im Text; DM 48,— , 1968 .

[52]  Gert-Jan Nabuurs,et al.  Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries , 2003 .

[53]  T. Kneib,et al.  Saproxylic beetle assemblages related to silvicultural management intensity and stand structures in a beech forest in Southern Germany , 2008, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[54]  Martin C.D. Speight,et al.  Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation , 1989 .

[55]  N. Stork,et al.  How do beetle assemblages respond to cyclonic disturbance of a fragmented tropical rainforest landscape? , 2009, Oecologia.

[56]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness , 2001 .

[57]  L. M. Schroeder Retention or salvage logging of standing trees killed by the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus: Consequences for dead wood dynamics and biodiversity , 2007 .

[58]  B. McFarlane,et al.  Public perceptions of natural disturbance in Canada's national parks: the case of the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins). , 2006 .

[59]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Special Section: The Ecological Effects of Salvage Logging after Natural Disturbance , 2006 .

[60]  K. Martin,et al.  Effects of bark beetle outbreaks on avian biodiversity in the British Columbia interior: Implications for critical habitat management , 2006, Journal of Ecosystems and Management.

[61]  Daniel R. Brumbaugh,et al.  Reserve effects and natural variation in coral reef communities , 2008 .

[62]  J. Škvarenina,et al.  Effects of intensive versus no management strategies during an outbreak of the bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) (Col.: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in the Tatra Mts. in Poland and Slovakia , 2006 .

[63]  Juha Siitonen,et al.  Coarse woody debris and stand characteristics in mature managed and old-growth boreal mesic forests in southern Finland , 2000 .

[64]  A. Sverdrup‐Thygeson Can 'continuity indicator species' predict species richness or red-listed species of saproxylic beetles? , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[65]  Emilio Hernández-García,et al.  Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[66]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Targets for maintenance of dead wood for biodiversity conservation based on extinction thresholds , 2006 .

[67]  Mattias Boman,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of conservation strategies implemented in boreal forests: The area selection process , 2009 .

[68]  B. Økland,et al.  What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[69]  Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés,et al.  A new algorithm to calculate the nestedness temperature of presence–absence matrices , 2006 .

[70]  M. Villard,et al.  Setting Conservation Targets for Managed Forest Landscapes: Acknowledgements , 2009 .

[71]  K. Hornik,et al.  Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework , 2006 .

[72]  Jörg Müller,et al.  The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a national park: from pest to keystone species , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.