Chemical communication between synthetic and natural cells: a possible experimental design

The bottom-up construction of synthetic cells is one of the most intriguing and interesting research arenas in synthetic biology. Synthetic cells are built by encapsulating biomolecules inside lipid vesicles (liposomes), allowing the synthesis of one or more functional proteins. Thanks to the in situ synthesized proteins, synthetic cells become able to perform several biomolecular functions, which can be exploited for a large variety of applications. This paves the way to several advanced uses of synthetic cells in basic science and biotechnology, thanks to their versatility, modularity, biocompatibility, and programmability. In the previous WIVACE (2012) we presented the state-of-the-art of semi-synthetic minimal cell (SSMC) technology and introduced, for the first time, the idea of chemical communication between synthetic cells and natural cells. The development of a proper synthetic communication protocol should be seen as a tool for the nascent field of bio/chemical-based Information and Communication Technologies (bio-chem-ICTs) and ultimately aimed at building soft-wet-micro-robots. In this contribution (WIVACE, 2013) we present a blueprint for realizing this project, and show some preliminary experimental results. We firstly discuss how our research goal (based on the natural capabilities of biological systems to manipulate chemical signals) finds a proper place in the current scientific and technological contexts. Then, we shortly comment on the experimental approaches from the viewpoints of (i) synthetic cell construction, and (ii) bioengineering of microorganisms, providing up-to-date results from our laboratory. Finally, we shortly discuss how autopoiesis can be used as a theoretical framework for defining synthetic minimal life, minimal cognition, and as bridge between synthetic biology and artificial intelligence.

[1]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[2]  T. Yomo,et al.  A controllable gene expression system in liposomes that includes a positive feedback loop. , 2013, Molecular bioSystems.

[3]  Natalio Krasnogor,et al.  The imitation game—a computational chemical approach to recognizing life , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Pasquale Stano,et al.  Approaches to semi-synthetic minimal cells: a review , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[5]  Elio Tuci,et al.  An investigation of the evolutionary origin of reciprocal communication using simulated autonomous agents , 2009, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[7]  C Ronchi,et al.  The tree of knowledge , 2014 .

[8]  Tatsuya Suda,et al.  Molecular Communication Technology as a Biological ICT , 2011 .

[9]  P. Luisi,et al.  Spontaneous Protein Crowding in Liposomes: A New Vista for the Origin of Cellular Metabolism , 2010, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[10]  V. Noireaux,et al.  An E. coli cell-free expression toolbox: application to synthetic gene circuits and artificial cells. , 2012, ACS synthetic biology.

[11]  D. Endy.  Foundations for engineering biology , 2005, Nature.

[12]  Benjamin G Davis,et al.  Sugar synthesis in a protocellular model leads to a cell signalling response in bacteria. , 2009, Nature chemistry.

[13]  Minami Yoda,et al.  Towards an in vivo biologically inspired nanofactory. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  P. Luisi,et al.  Experimental perspectives for a chemical communication between synthetic and natural cells , 2012 .

[15]  Luisa Damiano,et al.  Semi-synthetic minimal cells as a tool for biochemical ICT , 2012, Biosyst..

[16]  Kazufumi Hosoda,et al.  Replication of Genetic Information with Self‐Encoded Replicase in Liposomes , 2008, ChemBioChem.

[17]  Guillaume Salbreux,et al.  Reconstitution of an actin cortex inside a liposome. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[18]  T. Yomo,et al.  Size control of giant unilamellar vesicles prepared from inverted emulsion droplets. , 2012, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[19]  R. Maier.  Biosurfactants: evolution and diversity in bacteria. , 2003, Advances in applied microbiology.

[20]  David A. Weitz,et al.  Production of Unilamellar Vesicles Using an Inverted Emulsion , 2003 .

[21]  M Wakabayashi,et al.  Synthesis of functional protein in liposome. , 2001, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[22]  R. Titball.  Bacterial phospholipases C , 1993, Microbiological reviews.

[23]  G. Kaufmann,et al.  Macromolecular inhibition of quorum sensing: enzymes, antibodies, and beyond. , 2011, Chemical reviews.

[24]  Takuya Ueda,et al.  Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[26]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[27]  Luisa Damiano.  Co-emergences in life and science: a double proposal for biological emergentism , 2010, Synthese.

[28]  R. Titball.  Bacterial phospholipases , 1998, Trends in microbiology.

[29]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  The Cognitive Body: From Dynamic Modulation to Anticipation , 2009, ABiALS.

[30]  Yutetsu Kuruma,et al.  A synthetic biology approach to the construction of membrane proteins in semi-synthetic minimal cells. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[31]  Víctor de Lorenzo,et al.  Beware of metaphors: Chasses and orthogonality in synthetic biology , 2011, Bioengineered bugs.

[32]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  Further Experiments in the Evolution of Minimally Cognitive Behavior: From Perceiving Affordances to Selective Attention , 2000 .

[33]  Marian Gheorghe,et al.  A computational study of liposome logic: towards cellular computing from the bottom up , 2010, Systems and Synthetic Biology.