Secondary Bjerknes forces between two bubbles and the phenomenon of acoustic streamers

The translational velocities of two spherical gas bubbles oscillating in water, which is irradiated by a high-intensity acoustic wave field, are calculated. The two bubbles are assumed to be located far enough apart so that shape oscillations can be neglected. Viscous effects are included owing to the small size of the bubbles. An asymptotic solution is obtained that accounts for the viscous drag on each bubble, for large ${\it Re}$ based on the radial part of the motion, in a form similar to the leading-order prediction by Levich (1962), $C_{D} = 48/{\it Re}_{T}$; ${\it Re}_{T} \to \infty$ based on the translational velocity. In this context the translational velocity of each bubble, which is a direct measure of the secondary Bjerknes force between the two bubbles, is evaluated asymptotically and calculated numerically for sound intensities as large as the Blake threshold. Two cases are examined. First, two bubbles of unequal size with radii on the order of $100\,\umu$m are subjected to a sound wave with amplitude $P_{A} < 1.0$ bar and forcing frequency $\omega_{f} = 0.51\omega_{10}$, so that the second harmonic falls within the range defined by the eigenfrequencies of the two bubbles, $\omega_{10} < 2\omega_{f} < \omega_{20}$. It is shown that their translational velocity changes sign, becoming repulsive as $P_{A}$ increases from 0.05 to 0.1 bar due to the growing second harmonic, $2\omega_{f}$, of the forcing frequency. However, as the amplitude of sound further increases, $P_{A} \approx 0.5$ bar, the two bubbles attract each other due to the growth of even higher harmonics that fall outside the range defined by the eigenfrequencies of the two bubbles. Second, the case of much smaller bubbles is examined, radii on the order of $10\,\umu$m, driven well below resonance, $\omega_{f}/2\pi = 20$ kHz, at very large sound intensities, $P_{A} \approx 1$ bar. Numerical simulations show that the forces between the two bubbles tend to be attractive, except for a narrow region of bubble size corresponding to a nonlinear resonance related to the Blake threshold. As the distance between them decreases, the region of repulsion is shifted, indicating sign inversion of their mutual force. Extensive numerical simulations indicate the formation of bubble pairs with constant average inter-bubble distance, consisting of bubbles with equilibrium radii determined by the primary and secondary resonance frequencies for small and moderate sound amplitudes or by the Blake threshold for large sound amplitudes. It is conjectured that in experiments where ‘acoustic streamers’ are observed, which are filamentary structures consisting of bubbles that are aligned and move rapidly in a cavitating fluid at nearly constant distances from each other, bubbles with size determined by the Blake threshold are predominant because those with size determined by linear resonance are larger and therefore become unstable due to shape oscillations.

[1]  A. Szeri,et al.  Coupled dynamics of translation and collapse of acoustically driven microbubbles. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  M. Minnaert XVI.On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water , 1933 .

[3]  D. W. Moore The boundary layer on a spherical gas bubble , 1963, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[4]  Dominique Legendre,et al.  The viscous drag force on a spherical bubble with a time-dependent radius , 1998 .

[5]  Marios M. Fyrillas,et al.  Dissolution or growth of soluble spherical oscillating bubbles , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  Andrea Prosperetti,et al.  Bubble dynamics in a compressible liquid. Part 1. First-order theory , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  William L. Haberman,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DRAG AND SHAPE OF AIR BUBBLES RISING IN VARIOUS LIQUIDS , 1953 .

[8]  S. Orszag,et al.  Advanced Mathematical Methods For Scientists And Engineers , 1979 .

[9]  O. D. Kellogg Fields of Force , 1967 .

[10]  Ulrich Parlitz,et al.  Bjerknes forces between small cavitation bubbles in a strong acoustic field , 1997 .

[11]  A. Prosperetti,et al.  A generalization of the impulse and virial theorems with an application to bubble oscillations , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  John Tsamopoulos,et al.  Bjerknes forces between two bubbles. Part 1. Response to a step change in pressure , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Olgert Lindau,et al.  Bubble dynamics, shock waves and sonoluminescence , 1999, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Lawrence A. Crum,et al.  Bjerknes forces on bubbles in a stationary sound field , 1975 .

[15]  Michael J. Miksis,et al.  Bubble Oscillations of Large Amplitude , 1980 .

[16]  Coupled pulsation and translation of two gas bubbles in a liquid , 2001 .

[17]  Velocity of Transient Cavities in an Acoustic Stationary Wave , 1972 .

[18]  Dynamics of two interacting bubbles in an acoustic field , 1999 .

[19]  Thomas S. Lundgren,et al.  Oscillations of drops in zero gravity with weak viscous effects , 1988, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Joel H. Ferziger,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics , 1996 .

[21]  S. Bruckenstein Physicochemical hydrodynamics , 1977, Nature.

[22]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[23]  John Tsamopoulos,et al.  Bjerknes forces between two bubbles. Part 2. Response to an oscillatory pressure field , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  John Tsamopoulos,et al.  A hybrid finite-boundary element method for inviscid flows with free surface , 1992 .

[25]  G. Haar The Acoustic Bubble , 1996 .

[26]  Olgert Lindau,et al.  Investigations of Cavitation Bubble Dynamics by Means of Fast Cinematography , 2000 .

[27]  S. Slavchev,et al.  The Unsteady Boundary Layer on a Spherical Gas Bubble , 1979 .