Online Viewing and Aesthetic Preferences of Generation Y and the Baby Boom Generation: Testing User Web Site Experience Through Eye Tracking

The baby boom generation, born from 1946 to 1964, and Generation Y, born from 1977 to 1990, form two important groups of online users in terms of numbers and economic impact. Understanding their Web preferences is of great importance to companies, particularly because the literature suggests that these generations may differ in how they view Web pages and in what they find visually pleasing. To this end, a laboratory experiment examined users' reactions to a set of home pages. Users' reactions were captured using self-report measures and eye tracking, which recorded fixations. Overall, both generations reported similar aesthetic preferences, and both generations preferred pages that had images and little text. However, the two generations also displayed different online viewing behavior and preferences. For instance, eye-tracking data revealed that baby boomers had significantly more fixations and that their fixations covered more of the pages (e.g., headers, main body, sidebars) than those of Generation Yers. In addition, baby boomers reported a significantly higher tolerance for having more Web components on a page. These results suggest that Generation Yers will be more likely than baby boomers to miss key information if a Web page fails to present that information using a limited number of clear focal points that are located above the fold of the page. The relationship observed between viewing behavior and visual appeal supports the importance of aesthetics in usability research. Moreover, this research suggests that companies targeting either generation could benefit from being mindful of the visual appeal of their Web site.

[1]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Gender Preferences in Web Design: Usability Testing through Eye Tracking , 2007, AMCIS.

[2]  Andrea Everard,et al.  An Experimental Study of Antecedents and Consequences of Online Ad Intrusiveness , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Stephen Abram,et al.  Born with the Chip:The next Generation Will Profoundly Impact Both Library Service and the Culture within the Profession. , 2004 .

[4]  J. Nasar,et al.  The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same , 1989 .

[5]  Duane F. Alwin,et al.  Rethinking Generations , 2007 .

[6]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Toward the Study of Aesthetics in Information Technology , 2004, ICIS.

[8]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[9]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach , 2009 .

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Use of Information in Decision Making: An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer-Based Decision Aids , 1992, MIS Q..

[11]  Bruce Tulgan,et al.  Not everyone gets a trophy : how to manage generation Y , 2009 .

[12]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[13]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[14]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  User Satisfaction, Aesthetics and Usability: Beyond Reductionism , 2002, Usability.

[15]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[16]  Mohammad Mahdian,et al.  Pay-Per-Action Model for On-line Advertising , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[17]  Bonnie Nichols,et al.  Reading At Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. Research Division Report #46. , 2004 .

[18]  Pete Faraday,et al.  Visually Critiquing Web Pages , 1999, Eurographics Multimedia Workshop.

[19]  D. Krugman,et al.  Adolescents' Attention to Beer and Cigarette Print Ads and Associated Product Warnings , 1998 .

[20]  Stephan Wensveen,et al.  Aesthetic Interaction: A Framework , 2010, Design Issues.

[21]  Jeanne L. Holley,et al.  Generation Y: Understanding the Trend and Planning for the Impact , 2008, 2008 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference.

[22]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[23]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: an interactive account. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[25]  M. Kubovy,et al.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: a probabilistic model of grouping by proximity and similarity in regular patterns. , 2008, Psychological review.

[26]  Bing Pan,et al.  The determinants of web page viewing behavior: an eye-tracking study , 2004, ETRA.

[27]  Susannah Fox,et al.  Generations online in 2009 , 2009 .

[28]  U. Foehr MEDIA MULTITASKING AMONG AMERICAN YOUTH: PREVALENCE, PREDICTORS AND PAIRINGS , 2006 .

[29]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Efficiency, Trust, and Visual Appeal: Usability Testing through Eye Tracking , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  Paula M. C. Swatman,et al.  Mustering Consent: Government-Sponsored Virtual Communities and the Incentives for Buy-in , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[31]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[32]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[33]  D. Mackay,et al.  The psychology of seeing. , 1973, Transactions of the ophthalmological societies of the United Kingdom.

[34]  Mat Felthousen The trail less traveled: making computing labs usable by removing barriers , 2008, SIGUCCS '08.

[35]  Shawn M. Carraher,et al.  Using the kaleidoscope career model to examine generational differences in work attitudes , 2009 .

[36]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  WebQual: An Instrument for Consumer Evaluation of Web Sites , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[37]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[38]  Allison Carr,et al.  “More than words”: screencasting as a reference tool , 2009 .

[39]  Roel Vertegaal,et al.  Explaining effects of eye gaze on mediated group conversations:: amount or synchronization? , 2002, CSCW '02.

[40]  Angela M. Weiler Information-seeking behavior in Generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory , 2005 .

[41]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Eye Gaze Patterns while Searching vs. Browsing a Website , 2007 .

[42]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Tracking Users’ Viewing Pattern , 2009 .

[43]  J. Nielsen F-shaped pattern for reading Web content, Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox , 2006 .

[44]  R. E. Robinson,et al.  The art of seeing : an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter , 1993 .

[45]  Kristiina Karvonen,et al.  The beauty of simplicity , 2000, CUU '00.

[46]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Attributes of Web Site Usability: A Study of Web Users with the Repertory Grid Technique , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[47]  Richard T. Sweeney Reinventing Library Buildings and Services for the Millennial Generation , 2005 .

[48]  J. Darley,et al.  A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. , 1983 .

[49]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Leonardo's laptop: human needs and the new computing technologies , 2005, CIKM '05.

[50]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Country Development: Accounting for Area Interrelationships , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[51]  Kai Wang,et al.  Influence of Web Advertising Strategies, Consumer Goal-Directedness, and Consumer Involvement on Web Advertising Effectiveness , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[52]  Bo N. Schenkman,et al.  Aesthetics and preferences of web pages , 2000, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[53]  Michael Newby,et al.  COMPUTER LABORATORY ENVIRONMENTS: PROVIDING A SUITABLE PRACTICAL LEARNING EXPERIENCE , 2003 .

[54]  Soussan Djamasbi,et al.  Does positive affect influence the effective usage of a Decision Support System? , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[55]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Does Aesthestics Matter in Human-Computer Interaction? , 2005, MuC.

[56]  Diana G. Oblinger Boomers, Gen-Xers, and Millennials: Understanding the "New Students.". , 2003 .