The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons.

Pigeons were trained to discriminate the duration of a stimulus. One response in a psychophysical choice situation was reinforced, given the immediately prior presentation of a stimulus duration in one class of durations called short durations, and the other response was reinforced given the immediately prior presentation of a stimulus duration in a second class called long durations. Durations of equal logarithmic difference from the cutoff, whether in the short or long class, yielded equal accuracy. Accuracy was a function not only of the properties of the stimuli to be discriminated, but also of the experimental contingencies used. Accuracy was greater in variable-ratio than in fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement of the discriminative responses, and was lower at the beginning than later in individual fixed ratios. Proportion of short or long responses (response bias) was affected by sequential dependencies among long and short durations and was effectively controlled through the use of asymmetric reinforcement and fixed-ratio contingencies.

[1]  K. Zener,et al.  The method of absolute judgment in psychophysics. , 1928 .

[2]  An Improved Method for Establishing Temporal Discrimination in White Rats , 1941 .

[3]  C B FERSTER,et al.  Intermittent reinforcement of matching to sample in the pigeon. , 1960, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  W W CUMMING,et al.  Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  P. B. Dews,et al.  THE EFFECT OF MULTIPLE SΔ PERIODS ON RESPONDING ON A FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULE1 , 1962 .

[6]  G S REYNOLDS,et al.  Temporal Discrimination in Pigeons , 1962, Science.

[7]  C. Douglas Creelman,et al.  Human Discrimination of Auditory Duration , 1962 .

[8]  W W CUMMING,et al.  Ratio reinforcement of matching behavior. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  CONSISTENCY OF AUDITORY DETECTION JUDGMENTS. , 1963, Psychological review.

[10]  G. S. Reynolds TEMPORALLY SPACED RESPONDING BY PIGEONS: DEVELOPMENT AND EFFECTS OF DEPRIVATION AND EXTINCTION. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  T. Risley GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS FOLLOWING TWO-RESPONSE DISCRIMINATION TRAINING. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  P. Dews The effect of multiple S-delta periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule: 3. Effect of changes in pattern of interruptions, parameters and stimuli. , 1965, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  G. S. Reynolds Discrimination and emission of temporal intervals by pigeons. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  P. Dews The effect of multiple S periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule: IV. Effect of continuous S with only short S probes. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  M. Treisman,et al.  Relation between signal detectability theory and the traditional procedures for measuring sensory thresholds: Estimating d' from results given by the method of constant simuli. , 1966 .

[16]  I. Goldiamond,et al.  Some discriminative properties of fixed ratio performance in the pigeon. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  M. Rilling Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.