P300 Brain-Computer Interface Performance: A dry electrode study

Most brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are based on one of three types of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals: P300s, steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEP), and event-related desynchronization (ERD). EEG is typically recorded non-invasively using active or passive electrodes mounted on the human scalp. The common setup requires conductive electrode gel to get the best entrance impedance and noise ratio. However, electrode gel is inconvenient, uncomfortable, and entails setting problems that are especially pronounced when trained users are not available. Some work has introduced dry electrode systems that do not require gel, but often entail reduced comfort and signal quality. The principal goal of this study was to compare the performance of dry vs. gel-based electrodes in a very common BCI system: P300 spelling.

[1]  E. Sellers,et al.  How many people are able to control a P300-based brain–computer interface (BCI)? , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[2]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  Rapid Communication with a “P300” Matrix Speller Using Electrocorticographic Signals (ECoG) , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[3]  J. Orr,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Respiratory Flow and CO2 , 2010, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[4]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A novel P300-based brain–computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: Moving beyond rows and columns , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery and action observation: Modulation of sensorimotor brain rhythms during mental control of a brain–computer interface , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Huggins,et al.  What would brain-computer interface users want? Opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2011, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : official publication of the World Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases.

[8]  Donatella Mattia,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface as Input Channel for a Standard Assistive Technology Software , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[9]  Brendan Z. Allison,et al.  Comparison of Dry and Gel Based Electrodes for P300 Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  Jane E Huggins,et al.  Barriers to and mediators of brain–computer interface user acceptance: focus group findings , 2012, Ergonomics.

[11]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Multiple Channel Detection of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  A combined brain–computer interface based on P300 potentials and motion-onset visual evoked potentials , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.