Flight and flight control by the antennae in the Small Tortoiseshell (Aglais urticae L., Lepidoptera)

Summary1.Normal Small Tortoiseshells tethered to a flight mill fly up to 5 h (Figs. 1,3). Following flagellar amputation (Fig. 2), flight speed increases significantly by about 30% (Fig. 4). Increased flight speed persists when the amputated flagella are attached to the frons (Fig. 5), but normal flight speed is restored when the amputated flagella are reattached to the proximal antennal stumps (Fig. 6).2.Progressive amputation of parts of the flagella results in successive increases in flight speed (Fig. 7). Lengthening of the flagella decreases flight speed (Fig. 8). By varying its flight speed, the butterfly keeps the torque generated by drag in the pedicel-flagellum joint nearly constant over a wide range (Fig. 9).3.A strong interaction exists between optical and aerodynamic sensory inputs. Normal butterflies lacking optical orientation make only short duration flights. However, flagellarless animals lacking optical information not only fly consistently, but show a further increase in flight speed compared to those with normal optical feedback (Fig. 10).4.Flight speed (Fig. 11) and flight behavior of normal and operated butterflies were also investigated in free flight. All operations which in tethered flight are followed by changes in flight speed, lead to either a reduction or to a total loss of free flight ability.

[1]  G. Kreysa Angewandte Statistik. Von Lothar Sachs. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1978. 552 S., 59 Abb., 190 Tab., DM 59,80 , 1979 .

[2]  K. Kaissling,et al.  Der Bau der Antenne des Seidenspinners Bombyx mori L. II. Sensillen, cuticulare Bildungen und innerer Bau , 1957 .

[3]  R. C. RAINEY,et al.  Weather and the Movements of Locust Swarms: A New Hypothesis , 1951, Nature.

[4]  E. Walter,et al.  Lienert, G. A.: Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. Verlag Anton Hain, Meisenheim am Glan 1962; X + 361 S., DM 39,50 , 1964 .

[5]  M. Gewecke Antennen und Stirn-Scheitelhaare vonLocusta migratoria L. als Luftströmungs-Sinnesorgane bei der Flugsteuerung , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[6]  F. A. Urquhart The Monarch Butterfly , 1960 .

[7]  M. Gewecke The Antennae of Insects as Air-Current Sense Organs and their Relationship to the Control of Flight , 1974 .

[8]  Michael Gewecke,et al.  Die Wirkung von Luftströmung auf die Antennen und das Flugverhalten der blauen Schmeissfliege (Calliphora Erythrocephala) , 2004, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[9]  H. Heinzel,et al.  Aerodynamic and mechanical properties of the antennae as air-current sense organs inLocusta migratoria , 1980, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Donald R. Griffin,et al.  The Physiology and Geophysics of Bird Navigation , 1969, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[11]  Michael Gewecke The influence of the air-current sense organs on the flight behaviour ofLocusta migratoria , 2005, Journal of comparative physiology.

[12]  Herbert Heran,et al.  Wahrnehmung und Regelung der Flugeigengeschwindigkeit bei Apis mellifica L. , 1959, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[13]  Michael Gewecke,et al.  Flight and flight control by the antennae in the Small Tortoiseshell (Aglais urticae L., Lepidoptera) , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  The antennal movement apparatus in the small tortoiseshell (Aglais urticae L., Insecta, Lepidoptera) , 1978, Zoomorphologie.