Real-time prediction and avoidance of secondary crashes under unexpected traffic congestion.

According to the Federal Highway Administration, nonrecurring congestion contributes to nearly half of the overall congestion. Temporal disruptions impact the effective use of the complete roadway, due to speed reduction and rubbernecking resulting from primary incidents that in turn provoke secondary incidents. There is an additional reduction of discharge flow caused by secondary incident that significantly increases total delay. Therefore, it is important to sequentially predict the probability of secondary incidents and develop appropriate countermeasures to reduce the associated risk. Advanced computing techniques were used to easily understand and reliably predict secondary incident occurrences that have low sample mean and a small sample size. The likelihood of a secondary incident was sequentially predicted from the point of incident response to the eventual road clearance. The quality of predictions improved with the availability of additional information. The prediction performance of the principled Bayesian learning approach to neural networks (bnn) was compared to the Stochastic Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (gbdt). A pedagogical rule extraction approach, trepan, which extracts comprehensible rules from the neural networks, improved the ability to understand secondary incidents in a simplified manner. With an acceptable accuracy, gbdt is a useful tool that presents the relative importance of the predictor variables. Unexpected traffic congestion incurred by an incident is a dominant causative factor for the occurrence of secondary incidents at different stages of incident clearance. This symbolic description represents a series of decisions that may assist emergency operators by improving their decision-making capabilities. Analyzing causes and effects of traffic incidents helps traffic operators develop incident-specific strategic plans for prompt emergency response and clearance. Application of the model in connected vehicle environments will help drivers receive proactive corrective feedback before a crash. The proposed methodology can be used to alert drivers about potential highway conditions and may increase the drivers' awareness of potential events when no rerouting is possible, optimal or otherwise.

[1]  Radford M. Neal MCMC Using Hamiltonian Dynamics , 2011, 1206.1901.

[2]  Shaw-Pin Miaou,et al.  Pitfalls of Using R2 to Evaluate Goodness of Fit of Accident Prediction Models , 1996 .

[3]  David S. Hurwitz,et al.  Nonparametric Modeling of Vehicle-Type-Specific Headway Distribution in Freeway Work Zones , 2015 .

[4]  J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting , 2002 .

[5]  Sabyasachee Mishra,et al.  Prediction of secondary crash frequency on highway networks. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Zhang Lanfang,et al.  Modeling secondary accidents identified by traffic shock waves. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Methods for Defining Spatiotemporal Influence Areas and Secondary Incident Detection in Freeways , 2014 .

[8]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  Real-time prediction of secondary incident occurrences using vehicle probe data , 2016 .

[9]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Freeway Operations, Spatiotemporal-Incident Characteristics, and Secondary-Crash Occurrence , 2010 .

[10]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  Interpretation of Bayesian neural networks for predicting the duration of detected incidents , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[11]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Incident management integration tool: dynamically predicting incident durations, secondary incident occurrence and incident delays , 2012 .

[12]  Ying Lee,et al.  Sequential forecast of incident duration using Artificial Neural Network models. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Hong Yang,et al.  Mining the Characteristics of Secondary Crashes on Highways , 2014 .

[14]  Hong Yang,et al.  Investigating the Characteristics of Secondary Crashes on Freeways , 2013 .

[15]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  Stochastic Capacity Adjustment Considering Secondary Incidents , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  Optimal number and location of Bluetooth sensors considering stochastic travel time prediction , 2015 .

[17]  Hong Yang,et al.  Development of Online Scalable Approach for Identifying Secondary Crashes , 2014 .

[18]  Asad J. Khattak,et al.  Modeling the time to the next primary and secondary incident: A semi-Markov stochastic process approach , 2013 .

[19]  Hong Yang,et al.  Use of ubiquitous probe vehicle data for identifying secondary crashes , 2017 .

[20]  Eleni I. Vlahogianni,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Weather and Traffic on the Risk of Secondary Incidents , 2012, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[21]  Jude W. Shavlik,et al.  Understanding Time-Series Networks: A Case Study in Rule Extraction , 1997, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[22]  Hyoshin Park,et al.  A Stochastic Emergency Response Location Model Considering Secondary Incidents on Freeways , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[23]  Hong Yang,et al.  Use of Sensor Data to Identify Secondary Crashes on Freeways , 2013 .

[24]  Wei Wang,et al.  Development of a variable speed limit strategy to reduce secondary collision risks during inclement weathers. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.