Model-based targeted dimensionality reduction for neuronal population data

Summarizing high-dimensional data using a small number of parameters is a ubiquitous first step in the analysis of neuronal population activity. Recently developed methods use "targeted" approaches that work by identifying multiple, distinct low-dimensional subspaces of activity that capture the population response to individual experimental task variables, such as the value of a presented stimulus or the behavior of the animal. These methods have gained attention because they decompose total neural activity into what are ostensibly different parts of a neuronal computation. However, existing targeted methods have been developed outside of the confines of probabilistic modeling, making some aspects of the procedures ad hoc, or limited in flexibility or interpretability. Here we propose a new model-based method for targeted dimensionality reduction based on a probabilistic generative model of the population response data. The low-dimensional structure of our model is expressed as a low-rank factorization of a linear regression model. We perform efficient inference using a combination of expectation maximization and direct maximization of the marginal likelihood. We also develop an efficient method for estimating the dimensionality of each subspace. We show that our approach outperforms alternative methods in both mean squared error of the parameter estimates, and in identifying the correct dimensionality of encoding using simulated data. We also show that our method provides more accurate inference of low-dimensional subspaces of activity than a competing algorithm, demixed PCA.

[1]  R. Romo,et al.  Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[2]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Tensor Analysis Reveals Distinct Population Structure that Parallels the Different Computational Roles of Areas M1 and V1 , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  Christopher D. Harvey,et al.  Choice-specific sequences in parietal cortex during a virtual-navigation decision task , 2012, Nature.

[4]  Ari S. Morcos,et al.  History-dependent variability in population dynamics during evidence accumulation in cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Romo,et al.  Timing and neural encoding of somatosensory parametric working memory in macaque prefrontal cortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity , 2008, NIPS.

[7]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Techniques for extracting single-trial activity patterns from large-scale neural recordings , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Christian K. Machens,et al.  Demixing Population Activity in Higher Cortical Areas , 2009, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[9]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Christian K. Machens,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Functional , But Not Anatomical , Separation of “ What ” and “ When ” in Prefrontal Cortex , 2009 .

[11]  Yuan Zhao,et al.  Variational Latent Gaussian Process for Recovering Single-Trial Dynamics from Population Spike Trains , 2016, Neural Computation.

[12]  D. Rubin,et al.  The ECME algorithm: A simple extension of EM and ECM with faster monotone convergence , 1994 .

[13]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[14]  Naoshige Uchida,et al.  Demixed principal component analysis of neural population data , 2014, eLife.

[15]  Shih-Cheng Yen,et al.  Mixed selectivity morphs population codes in prefrontal cortex , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Single-Trial Neural Correlates of Arm Movement Preparation , 2011, Neuron.

[17]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Probabilistic Non-linear Principal Component Analysis with Gaussian Process Latent Variable Models , 2005, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[18]  W. Newsome,et al.  Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex , 2013, Nature.

[19]  A. Izenman Reduced-rank regression for the multivariate linear model , 1975 .