Geometrical Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

States of a quantum mechanical system are represented by rays in a complex Hilbert space. The space of rays has, naturally, the structure of a Uhler manifold. This leads to a geometrical formulation of the postulates of quantum mechanics which, although equivalent to the standard algebraic formulation, has a very different appearance. In particular, states are now represented by points of a symplectic manifold (which happens to have in addition a compatible Riemannian metric), observables are represented by certain real-valued functions on this space, and the Schrodinger evolution is captured by the symplectic flow generated by a Hamiltonian function. There is thus a remarkable similarity with the standard symplectic formulation of classical mechanics. Features such as uncertainties and state vector reductions—which are specific to quantum mechanics can also be formulated geometrically but now refer to the Riemannian metric—a structure which is absent in classical mechanics. The geometrical formulation sheds considerable light on a number of issues such as the second quantization procedure, the role of coherent states in semiclassical considerations, and the WKB approximation. More importantly, it suggests generalizations of quantum mechanics. The simplest among these are equivalent to the dynamical generalizations that have appeared in the literature. The geometrical reformulation provides a unified framework to discuss these and to correct a misconception. Finally, it also suggests directions in which more radical generalizations may be found.

[1]  G. Gibbons Typical states and density matrices , 1992 .

[2]  P. Pearle,et al.  Toward a Relativistic Theory of Statevector Reduction , 1990 .

[3]  C. Isham Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time , 1992, gr-qc/9210011.

[4]  R. Gilmore,et al.  Coherent states: Theory and some Applications , 1990 .

[5]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[6]  Pearle,et al.  Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[7]  Grassi,et al.  Continuous-spontaneous-reduction model involving gravity. , 1989, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[8]  Jerrold E. Marsden,et al.  Properties of infinite dimensional Hamiltonian systems , 1974 .

[9]  T. Kibble,et al.  Geometrization of quantum mechanics , 1979 .

[10]  A. Ashtekar,et al.  Conceptual problems of quantum gravity , 1991 .

[11]  L. Hughston,et al.  Geometry of stochastic state vector reduction , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[13]  Mark S. C. Reed,et al.  Method of Modern Mathematical Physics , 1972 .

[14]  A. Ashtekar,et al.  A technique for analyzing the structure of isometries , 1978 .

[15]  S. Weinberg Testing quantum mechanics , 1989 .

[16]  I. Bialynicki-Birula,et al.  Nonlinear Wave Mechanics , 1976 .

[17]  G. Aeppli,et al.  Proceedings of the International School of Physics Enrico Fermi , 1994 .

[18]  Heslot,et al.  Quantum mechanics as a classical theory. , 1985, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[19]  Roger Penrose,et al.  Précis of The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  D. Raine General relativity , 1980, Nature.

[21]  Weber,et al.  Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[22]  A. Perelomov Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications , 1986 .

[23]  Livio Pizzocchero,et al.  Quantum mechanics as an infinite‐dimensional Hamiltonian system with uncertainty structure: Part II , 1990 .

[24]  R. Penrose The emperor's new mind: concerning computers, minds, and the laws of physics , 1989 .

[25]  R. Penrose,et al.  Spinors and Space–Time: Subject and author index , 1984 .

[26]  J. Marsden,et al.  Some basic properties of infinite dimensional Hamiltonian systems , 1974 .

[27]  矢野 健太郎,et al.  Structures on manifolds , 1984 .

[28]  Gell-Mann,et al.  Classical equations for quantum systems. , 1992, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[29]  John R. Klauder,et al.  Continuous‐Representation Theory. II. Generalized Relation between Quantum and Classical Dynamics , 1963 .

[30]  W. Heitler The Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1947, Nature.

[31]  P. Pearle Reduction of the state vector by a nonlinear Schrödinger equation , 1976 .

[32]  M. Reed Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. I: Functional Analysis , 1972 .

[33]  R. Gilmore GEOMETRY OF SYMMETRIZED STATES. , 1972 .

[34]  R. Geroch A Method for Generating Solutions of Einstein's Equations , 1971 .

[35]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics , 1988 .

[36]  A. Perelomov Coherent states for arbitrary Lie group , 1972 .

[37]  C. Lanczos The variational principles of mechanics , 1949 .

[38]  Karel V. Kuchař,et al.  TIME AND INTERPRETATIONS OF QUANTUM GRAVITY , 2011 .

[39]  Aharonov,et al.  Geometry of quantum evolution. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[40]  C. J. Isham,et al.  Quantum logic and the histories approach to quantum theory , 1993 .