Mitigation potential of carbon dioxide emissions in the Chinese textile industry

We estimated the reduction potential of carbon dioxide emissions in the Chinese textile industry by forecasting the carbon intensity (CO2 emissions/industrial value added) in different scenarios. The Johansen co-integration technique was employed in order to establish the long term equilibrium equation. Three scenarios (Business As Usual (BAU), medium and optimum) were designed to estimate the future trend of carbon intensity in the Chinese textile industry. The results showed that energy price, energy substitution, labor productivity and technology have significant impact on the carbon intensity. Estimated to 1.49t CO2/10,000 yuan in 2010, we found that for the BAU scenario, the carbon intensity will decrease to 0.5 and 0.29t CO2/10,000 yuan by 2020 and 2025 respectively. For the medium scenario, carbon intensity will decline to 0.12t CO2/10,000 yuan. Yet by the optimum scenario, the intensity is expected to considerably decrease to 0.05t CO2/10,000 yuan by 2025. Using the BAU forecast as baseline, the quantity of reduction potential in carbon dioxide emissions is estimated to be 44.8milliontons CO2 by 2025. Considering this huge potential, we provided policy suggestions to reduce the level of CO2 emissions in the Chinese textile industry.

[1]  P. Zhou,et al.  Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A slacks-based efficiency measure , 2012 .

[2]  Wenqiang Sun,et al.  Change in Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions From Energy Use in China’s Iron and Steel Industry , 2011 .

[3]  S. Johansen,et al.  MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE ON COINTEGRATION — WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DEMAND FOR MONEY , 2009 .

[4]  P. Phillips Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression , 1988 .

[5]  Li Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of electricity saving potential in China's chemical industry based on cointegration , 2012 .

[6]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Methods for calculating CO2 intensity of power generation and consumption: A global perspective , 2011 .

[7]  Erdem Görgün,et al.  The scenario analysis on CO2 emission mitigation potential in the Turkish electricity sector: 2006–2030 , 2013 .

[8]  G. Hondroyiannis Estimating residential demand for electricity in Greece , 2004 .

[9]  Lynn Price,et al.  The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry , 2010 .

[10]  Jyoti K. Parikh,et al.  Indicators of carbon emission intensity from commercial energy use in India , 2000 .

[11]  Boqiang Lin Electricity demand in the People's Republic of China : investment requirement and environmental impact , 2003 .

[12]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Evaluation of potential reductions in carbon emissions in Chinese provinces based on environmental DEA , 2011 .

[13]  Lynn Price,et al.  Potential Energy Savings and CO2 Emissions Reduction of China's Cement Industry , 2012 .

[14]  W. B. Davis,et al.  Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity for the manufacturing sector: comparison of declining trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971–1991 , 1998 .

[15]  D. Haralambopoulos,et al.  CO2 emissions in Greece for 1990-2002: A decomposition analysis and comparison of results using the Arithmetic Mean Divisia Index and Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index techniques , 2008 .

[16]  Varun Grover,et al.  The influence of information technology diffusion and business process change on perceived productivity: The IS executive's perspective , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[17]  S. Johansen Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models , 1996 .

[18]  Bruno Larue,et al.  The market efficiency hypothesis: The case of coffee and cocoa futures , 1997 .

[19]  Jing Deng,et al.  CO2 emission from China's energy sector and strategy for its control , 2010 .

[20]  Roberto Schaeffer,et al.  Potential for reduction of CO2 emissions and a low-carbon scenario for the Brazilian industrial sector , 2010 .

[21]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  Electricity saving potential of the power generation industry in China , 2012 .

[22]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[23]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .

[24]  Izzet Ari,et al.  Carbon dioxide emission from the Turkish electricity sector and its mitigation options , 2011 .

[25]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[26]  Sai Liang,et al.  Carbon dioxide mitigation target of China in 2020 and key economic sectors , 2013 .

[27]  Zhen Cheng,et al.  Energy demand and carbon emissions under different development scenarios for Shanghai, China , 2010 .

[28]  M. Hashem Pesaran,et al.  Working with Microfit 4.0 : interactive econometric analysis , 1997 .

[29]  Can Wang,et al.  Analysis of the economic impact of different Chinese climate policy options based on a CGE model incorporating endogenous technological change , 2009 .

[30]  Ying Fan,et al.  Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China's cement industry: A perspective from LMDI decomposition analysis , 2012 .

[31]  Can Wang,et al.  Revisiting CO2 mitigation potential and costs in China’s electricity sector , 2010 .

[32]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[33]  Mikael Skou Andersen,et al.  Decoupling of industrial energy consumption and CO2-emissions in energy-intensive industries in Scandinavia , 2007 .

[34]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Energy efficiency and carbon dioxide emissions reduction opportunities in the US iron and steel sector , 2001 .

[35]  W. B. Davis,et al.  Decomposition of aggregate carbon intensity for freight: trends from 10 OECD countries for the period 1971-1993 , 1999 .