Proteolytic mapping of kinesin/ncd‐microtubule interface: nucleotide‐dependent conformational changes in the loops L8 and L12

We used a battery of proteases to probe the footprint of microtubules on kinesin and ncd, and to search for nucleotide‐induced conformational changes in these two oppositely‐directed yet homologous molecular motors. Proteolytic cleavage sites were identified by N‐terminal microsequencing and electrospray mass spectrometry, and then mapped onto the recently‐determined atomic structures of ncd and kinesin. In both kinesin and ncd, microtubule binding shields a set of cleavage sites within or immediately flanking the loops L12, L8 and L11 and, in ncd, the loop L2. Even in the absence of microtubules, exchange of ADP for AMPPNP in the motor active site drives conformational shifts involving these loops. In ncd, a chymotryptic cleavage at Y622 in L12 is protected in the strong binding AMPPNP conformation, but cleaved in the weak binding ADP conformation. In kinesin, a thermolysin cleavage at L154 in L8 is protected in AMPPNP but cleaved in ADP. We speculate that ATP turnover in the active site governs microtubule binding by cyclically retracting or displaying the loops L8 and L12. Curiously, the retracted state of the loops corresponds to microtubule strong binding. Conceivably, nucleotide‐dependent display of loops works as a reversible block on strong binding.

[1]  Ronald D Vale,et al.  Microtubule Interaction Site of the Kinesin Motor , 1997, Cell.

[2]  P. Eagles,et al.  Studies using a fluorescent analogue of kinesin , 1991, Journal of Cell Science.

[3]  Roger Cooke,et al.  Crystal structure of the motor domain of the kinesin-related motor ncd , 1996, Nature.

[4]  P. Matsudaira A Practical guide to protein and peptide purification for microsequencing , 1989 .

[5]  R. A. Laymon,et al.  A three-domain structure of kinesin heavy chain revealed by DNA sequence and microtubule binding analyses , 1989, Cell.

[6]  R. Cross,et al.  Weak and strong states of kinesin and ncd. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  R. Cross,et al.  Origins of reversed directionality in the ncd molecular motor. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[8]  K. Johnson,et al.  Expression, purification, and characterization of the Drosophila kinesin motor domain produced in Escherichia coli. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[9]  L. Amos,et al.  Structure and dynamics of molecular motors. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[10]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Probing the Kinesin-Microtubule Interaction* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Andreas Hoenger,et al.  A Model for the Microtubule-Ncd Motor Protein Complex Obtained by Cryo-Electron Microscopy and Image Analysis , 1997, Cell.

[12]  H. Morii,et al.  Hydrolysis of AMPPNP by the motor domain of ncd, a kinesin‐related protein , 1997, FEBS letters.

[13]  R. Vale,et al.  Switches, latches, and amplifiers: common themes of G proteins and molecular motors , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  R. Cross,et al.  Kinesin and ncd bind through a single head to microtubules and compete for a shared MT binding site. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Mediation of meiotic and early mitotic chromosome segregation in Drosophila by a protein related to kinesin , 1990, Nature.

[16]  Ronald D. Vale,et al.  Crystal structure of the kinesin motor domain reveals a structural similarity to myosin , 1996, Nature.