Power Mobility Driving Training for Seniors: A Pilot Study

This article describes two power mobility training protocols used with seniors and compares posttraining driving performance. Twelve users of power mobility were consecutively recruited from two residential facilities in Toronto, Canada. The aim of training at both sites was to make clients comfortable with and safe at driving power mobility devices. The content of training was similar, but training protocols differed significantly in terms of the number of sessions (means of 3.43 vs. 9.80; p ≤ .05) and the time frame over which the sessions were offered (means of 1.57 vs. 5.10 weeks; p ≤ .01). Participants at the two sites differed significantly in terms of overall driving performance (p ≤ .05), gender (p ≤ .01), and type of device used (p ≤ .05). Overall, driving performance was significantly associated with facility, gender, type of device used, and training duration (p ≤ .05). When these variables were entered into an exploratory hierarchical regression, facility accounted for 64% of the variance in driving performance. When facility was controlled for, the correlations between device and duration of training with driving performance were no longer significant. The determinants of driving performance are difficult to clearly specify as the variable facility encompasses gender as well as all other differences between the two training protocols. Nevertheless, these data provide direction for future research in this area.

[1]  John Craig,et al.  Smart wheelchairs for mobility training , 1996 .

[2]  R L Kirby,et al.  Could changes in the wheelchair delivery system improve safety? , 1995, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[3]  L. Gauthier,et al.  The Bells Test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. , 1989 .

[4]  Debbie Field,et al.  Powered Mobility: A Literature Review Illustrating the Importance of a Multifaceted Approach , 1999 .

[5]  E G Moore,et al.  The health of Canada's elderly population: current status and future implications. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[6]  M. Law,et al.  Application of the Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A practical Tool , 1999, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[7]  R L Kirby,et al.  NONFATAL WHEELCHAIR-RELATED ACCIDENTS REPORTED TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRONIC INJURY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[8]  Claude Vincent,et al.  Development of an obstacle course assessment of wheelchair user performance (OCAWUP): A content validity study , 2004 .

[9]  C. Mulrow,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on nursing home patient outcomes. , 1992, Physical therapy.

[10]  Larry R. Squire,et al.  Neuropsychology of memory, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[11]  Frank Knoefel,et al.  State of the art in geriatric rehabilitation. Part I: review of frailty and comprehensive geriatric assessment. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  K. Wilkins,et al.  Chronic conditions, physical limitations and dependency among seniors living in the community. , 1996, Health reports.

[13]  Carole Miles-Tapping,et al.  Lifestyle Implications of Power Mobility , 1995 .

[14]  R. Keith.  Treatment strength in rehabilitation. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Patricia Rigby,et al.  The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A Transactive Approach to Occupational Performance , 1996 .

[16]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[17]  O. Spreen,et al.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1991 .

[18]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  WHEELCHAIR SAFETY—ADVERSE REPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[19]  Marco Trabucchi,et al.  Effectiveness of procedural memory stimulation in mild Alzheimer's disease patients: A controlled study , 2001 .

[20]  J. Sinacore,et al.  Stroke Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Comparison across Age Groups , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  J. Furumasu,et al.  The development of a powered wheelchair mobility program for young children , 1996 .

[22]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional anatomy of motor skill learning. , 2002 .

[23]  M Schloss,et al.  Platform motorized wheelchairs in congregate care centers: a survey of usage and safety. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  Deirdre R. Dawson,et al.  Development of the Power-Mobility Indoor Driving Assessment for Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities: A Preliminary Report , 1994 .

[25]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  Fatal Wheelchair-related Accidents in the United States , 1990, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[26]  D. Molloy,et al.  Reliability of a Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination. , 1991, The American journal of psychiatry.

[27]  J. Furumasu,et al.  Cognitive predictors of young children's readiness for powered mobility , 1999, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[28]  Črt Marinček.  Assistive technology - added value to the quality of life : AAATE'01 , 2001 .

[29]  S. Ferber,et al.  How to Assess Spatial Neglect - Line Bisection or Cancellation Tasks? , 2001, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[30]  H. Levin.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary , 1993 .