Dissociation of orientation discrimination from form detection for motion-defined bars and luminance-defined bars: Effects of dot lifetime and presentation duration

A stationary bar-shaped area that was perfectly camouflaged within a dot pattern was rendered visible by moving the dots inside and outside the bar at equal and opposite speeds. Orientation discrimination for this motion-defined (MD) bar was compared with orientation discrimination for a luminance-defined (LD) bar created by switching off all dots outside the bar. The best values of orientation discrimination threshold were similar for MD and LD bars at long presentation durations and long dot lifetimes. But, as presentation duration or dot lifetime was reduced below 1.0 sec, orientation discrimination threshold for MD bars increased at an accelerating rate, while discrimination for LD bars was comparatively unaffected. However, these effects of presentation duration and dot lifetime were largely due to changes in bar visibility. When bar visibility was normalised relative to the relevant bar detection threshold, the effect of presentation duration upon orientation discrimination was abolished for both MD and LD bars, and the effect of dot lifetime was abolished or even reversed. These observations dissociate detection and discrimination for MD and LD form. We suggest that orientation discrimination for MD and LD bars is determined by opponent-orientation mechanisms whose performance is not directly affected by presentation duration, nor degraded by reducing dot lifetime.

[1]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[2]  S. McKee,et al.  Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  D Regan,et al.  Form from motion parallax and form from luminance contrast: vernier discrimination. , 1986, Spatial vision.

[4]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion , 1986, Vision Research.

[5]  S. Anstis,et al.  Phi movement as a subtraction process. , 1970, Vision research.

[6]  D Regan,et al.  Spatial frequency discrimination in normal vision and in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The orientation specificity of two visual after‐effects , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  B. Julesz Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1971 .

[9]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  APE: Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions , 1981 .

[10]  D Regan,et al.  Masking of spatial-frequency discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  D. Regan Visual information channeling in normal and disordered vision. , 1982, Psychological review.

[12]  Gunther Wyszecki,et al.  Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae, 2nd Edition , 2000 .

[13]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[14]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial-frequency adaptation and grating discrimination: predictions of a line-element model. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  D. Mackay Perceptual conflict between visual motion and change of location , 1976, Vision Research.

[16]  D. Regan,et al.  Visual processing of motion-defined form: selective failure in patients with parietotemporal lesions , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlate of Binocular Depth Perception in Man , 1970, Nature.

[18]  F. Campbell,et al.  Orientational selectivity of the human visual system , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  D. Regan,et al.  Periodicity in orientation discrimination and the unconfounding of visual information , 1986, Vision Research.

[20]  J P Thomas,et al.  Bandwidths of orientation channels in human vision. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[21]  D. Regan,et al.  Figure-ground segregation by motion contrast and by luminance contrast. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  R. Hunt Colour Science : Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulas , 1968 .

[23]  D. Regan,et al.  Recognition of motion-defined shapes in patients with multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  D Regan,et al.  Visual Acuity for Optotypes Made Visible by Relative Motion , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Orientation Specificity and Spatial Selectivity in Human Vision , 1973, Perception.

[26]  D Regan,et al.  Spatial-frequency discrimination and detection: comparison of postadaptation thresholds. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[27]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Orientation and spatial-frequency discrimination for luminance and chromatic gratings. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  David Regan,et al.  Shape Discrimination for Motion-Defined and Contrast-Defined form: Squareness is Special , 1991, Perception.

[29]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  D. Regan Orientation discrimination for objects defined by relative motion and objects defined by luminance contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[31]  D. Regan,et al.  Postadaptation orientation discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.