Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Left Heart Chamber Quantification Using an Automated Adaptive Analytics Algorithm.

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to test the feasibility and accuracy of an automated algorithm that simultaneously quantifies 3-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-derived left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) volumes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Conventional manual 3D TTE tracings and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images were used as a reference for comparison. BACKGROUND Cardiac chamber quantification from 3D TTE is superior to 2D TTE measurements. However, integration of 3D quantification into clinical practice has been limited by time-consuming workflow and the need for 3D expertise. A novel automated software was developed that provides LV and LA volumetric quantification from 3D TTE datasets that reflect real-life manual 3-dimensional echocardiography measurements and values comparable to CMR. METHODS A total of 159 patients were studied in 2 separate protocols. In protocol 1, 94 patients underwent 3D TTE imaging (EPIQ, iE33, X5-1, Philips Healthcare, Andover, Massachusetts) covering the left atrium and left ventricle. LA and LV volumes and LVEF were obtained using the automated software (HeartModel, Philips Healthcare) with and without contour correction, and compared with the averaged manual 3D volumetric measurements from 3 readers. In protocol 2, automated measurements from 65 patients were compared with a CMR reference. The Pearson correlation coefficient, Bland-Altman analysis, and paired Student t tests were used to assess inter-technique agreement. RESULTS Correlations between the automated and manual 3D TTE measurements were strong (r = 0.87 to 0.96). LVEF was underestimated and automated LV end-diastolic, LV end-systolic, and LA volumes were overestimated compared with manual measurements. Agreement between the automated analysis and CMR was also strong (r = 0.84 to 0.95). Test-retest variability was low. CONCLUSIONS Automated simultaneous quantification of LA and LV volumes and LVEF is feasible and requires minimal 3D software analysis training. The automated measurements are not only comparable to manual measurements but also to CMR. This technique is highly reproducible and timesaving, and it therefore promises to facilitate the integration of 3D TTE-based left-heart chamber quantification into clinical practice.

[1]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left atrial volume: multicenter study for validation with CMR. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  J. Oh,et al.  Feasibility of single-beat full-volume capture real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and auto-contouring algorithm for quantification of left ventricular volume: validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  L. Sugeng,et al.  Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  Otto Kamp,et al.  EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. , 2012, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  R. Migrino,et al.  Left atrial volume measurement with automated border detection by 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging , 2009, Cardiovascular ultrasound.

[6]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of real-time full-volume 3D transthoracic echocardiography to measure LV volumes and systolic function: a fully automated endocardial contouring algorithm in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  Nathaniel Reichek,et al.  Relative importance of errors in left ventricular quantitation by two-dimensional echocardiography: insights from three-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  T. Marwick,et al.  Reproducibility of echocardiographic techniques for sequential assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: application to patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Y. Shimada,et al.  Underestimation of Left Atrial Volume by Three‐Dimensional Echocardiography Validated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Meta‐Analysis and Investigation of the Source of Bias , 2012, Echocardiography.

[10]  S. Kapetanakis,et al.  Interinstitutional measurements of left ventricular volumes, speckle-tracking strain, and dyssynchrony using three-dimensional echocardiography. , 2013, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Size and Function: Side-by-Side Comparison of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Computed Tomography With Magnetic Resonance Reference , 2006, Circulation.

[12]  Victor Mor-Avi,et al.  Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[13]  J. Sun,et al.  Novel single-beat full-volume capture real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and auto-contouring algorithm for quantification of left ventricular volume: validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  L. Badano,et al.  Sources of variation and bias in assessing left ventricular volumes and dyssynchrony using three-dimensional echocardiography , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[15]  Y. Shimada,et al.  A meta-analysis and investigation for the source of bias of left ventricular volumes and function by three-dimensional echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  J. Deux,et al.  Single-Beat Versus Multibeat Real-Time 3D Echocardiography for Assessing Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction: A Comparison Study With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.