[Relationship between O-EA angle and lower cervical curvature in patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation before and after occipitocervical fusion].

Objective To investigate the relationship between O-EA angle and lower cervical curvature in patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation undergoing occipitocervical fusion, and to analyze the effect of O-EA angle on lower cervical curvature. Methods The clinical data of 61 patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation undergoing occipitocervical fusion who were admitted between April 2010 and July 2018 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed. There were 32 males and 29 females, with an age of 14-76 years (mean, 50.7 years). The fixed segment included 19 cases of C 0-C 2, 27 cases of C 0-C 3, 14 cases of C 0-C 4, and 1 case of C 0-C 5. The O-EA angle, C 2-7 Cobb angle, and T 1 tilt angle were measured before operation and at last follow-up. According to the O-EA angle measured at last follow-up, the patients were divided into <95° group (group A), 95°-105° group (group B), and >105° group (group C), and compared the differences of gender, age, fixed segment (short segment was at C 3 and above, long segment was beyond C 3), and C 2-7 Cobb angle. Correlation analysis between the O-EA angle and C 2-7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up, as well as the changes of O-EA angle and C 2-7 Cobb angle between before operation and at last follow-up were analyzed. Results All 61 patients were followed up 12-24 months, with an average of 22.4 months. There was no significant difference in O-EA angle, C 2-7 Cobb angle, and T 1 tilt angle before operation and at last follow-up ( P>0.05). According to the last follow-up O-EA angle grouping, there were 14 cases in group A, 29 cases in group B, and 18 cases in group C. There was no significant difference in age, gender composition, and fixed segment composition among the three groups ( P>0.05); the differences in C 2-7 Cobb angles among the three groups were significant ( P<0.05), groups A, B, and C showed a gradually increasing trend. The O-EA angle was positively correlated with C 2-7 Cobb angle before operation and at last follow-up ( r=0.572, P=0.000; r=0.618, P=0.000); O-EA angle change at last follow-up was also positively correlated with C 2-7 Cobb change ( r=0.446, P=0.000). Conclusion The O-EA angle of patients with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation is positively correlated with C 2-7 Cobb angle. Too large O-EA angle should be avoided during occipitocervical fixation, otherwise it may accelerate the degeneration of the lower cervical spine.

[1]  Yueming Song,et al.  Impact of the occiput and external acoustic meatus to axis angle on dysphagia in patients suffering from anterior atlantoaxial subluxation after occipitocervical fusion. , 2019, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[2]  S. Matsuda,et al.  Occipital and external acoustic meatus to axis angle as a predictor of the oropharyngeal space in healthy volunteers: a novel parameter for craniocervical junction alignment. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[3]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  The Effect of Aging on Cervical Parameters in a Normative North American Population , 2016, Global spine journal.

[4]  H. Wong,et al.  Cervical Alignment Variations in Different Postures and Predictors of Normal Cervical Kyphosis: A New Understanding , 2017, Spine.

[5]  E. Been,et al.  Cervical lordosis: the effect of age and gender. , 2017, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  Kazuhisa Takahashi,et al.  Postoperative Increase in Occiput–C2 Angle Negatively Impacts Subaxial Lordosis after Occipito–Upper Cervical Posterior Fusion Surgery , 2016, Asian spine journal.

[7]  Y. Meng,et al.  Posterior distraction reduction and occipitocervical fixation for the treatment of basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation , 2016, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[8]  Sakae Tanaka,et al.  Correlations of Cervical Sagittal Alignment before and after Occipitocervical Fusion , 2015, Global spine journal.

[9]  Choon-Sung Lee,et al.  Does Preoperative T1 Slope Affect Radiological and Functional Outcomes After Cervical Laminoplasty? , 2014, Spine.

[10]  D. Hao,et al.  Occipitocervical fusion: Fix to C2 or C3? , 2014, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[11]  S. Kim,et al.  Is It Possible to Evaluate the Parameters of Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Cervical Computed Tomographic Scans? , 2014, Spine.

[12]  Zhongqiang Chen,et al.  The severity of operative invasion to the posterior muscular-ligament complex influences cervical sagittal balance after open-door laminoplasty , 2014, European Spine Journal.

[13]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Cervical Radiographical Alignment: Comprehensive Assessment Techniques and Potential Importance in Cervical Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[14]  S. Kim,et al.  T1 Slope as a Predictor of Kyphotic Alignment Change After Laminoplasty in Patients With Cervical Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[15]  Shaobai Wang,et al.  Relationship Between the Alignment of the Occipitoaxial and Subaxial Cervical Spine in Patients With Congenital Atlantoxial Dislocations , 2013, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[16]  P. Knott,et al.  The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. , 2010, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[17]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Does the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine have an impact on disk degeneration? Minimum 10-year follow-up of asymptomatic volunteers , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[18]  Guizhong Wu,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of the Relationship Between Sagittal Alignment and Disc Degeneration in the Cervical Spine , 2008, Spine.

[19]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Measurement of Occipitocervical Angle , 2004, Spine.

[20]  T. Sakou,et al.  Significance of Occipitoaxial Angle in Subaxial Lesion After Occipitocervical Fusion , 2001, Spine.