A new cell-based method for assessing the eye irritation potential of chemicals: an alternative to the Draize test.

Using a human corneal cell line (HCE-T cells) and 2 evaluation criteria, we developed a new alternative method to assess the eye irritation potential of chemicals. We exposed HCE-T cells to different concentrations of 38 chemicals for 1h and measured relative cell viability (RCV) as an endpoint at each concentration. Using the RCV values, we calculated the RCV50. We also exposed HCE-T cells to 3 fixed concentrations of the 38 chemicals (5%, 0.5%, and 0.05%) for 1h and measured the RCV at each concentration. Using the RCV values at 5%, 0.5%, and 0.05%, we developed a new criterion for eye irritation potential (total eye irritation score, TEIS) and estimated the ocular irritancy. We then assessed the correlation of the results of RCV50 and TEIS with those of the Draize rabbit eye irritation. Both the RCV50 and TEIS results exhibited good positive correlations (sensitivity: 80.77%, specificity: 83.33%, and accuracy: 81.58% for TEIS; sensitivity: 73.08-76.92%, specificity: 75.00%, and accuracy: 73.68-76.32% for RCV50). We conclude that the new in vitro model using HCE-T cells is a good alternative evaluation model for the prediction of the eye irritation potential of chemicals.

[1]  M. Iwaki,et al.  In vitro eye irritancy test of lauryl derivatives using the reconstructed rabbit corneal epithelium model. , 2009, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[2]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches. , 2010, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[3]  C S Weil,et al.  Study of intra- and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. , 1971, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[4]  H. Itagaki,et al.  An In Vitro Tier Evaluation for the Identification of Cosmetic Ingredients Which are Not Ocular Irritants , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[5]  C. Joo,et al.  Lumican induces human corneal epithelial cell migration and integrin expression via ERK 1/2 signaling. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[6]  Howard I. Maibach,et al.  OECD GUIDELINES FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test Method , 2013 .

[7]  Mitchell Klausner,et al.  Development of the EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test for Hazard Identification and Labelling of Eye Irritating Chemicals in Response to the Requirements of the EU Cosmetics Directive and REACH Legislation , 2011, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[8]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  First alternative method validated by a retrospective weight-of-evidence approach to replace the Draize eye test for the identification of non-irritant substances for a defined applicability domain. , 2010, ALTEX.

[9]  Yutaka Takahashi,et al.  Inter-laboratory study of short time exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) classification. , 2009, The Journal of toxicological sciences.

[10]  H Spielmann,et al.  Interlaboratory assessment of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay. , 1994, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[11]  Sunanda Kadam,et al.  Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals , 2010 .

[12]  C. Ehrhardt,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Epithelial Cell Cultures for Assessing Ocular Permeability , 2008, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[13]  Y Ohno,et al.  Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients. (1) Overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests. , 1999, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[14]  Hiroshi Honda,et al.  Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: an in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells. , 2008, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[15]  Nicola J Hewitt,et al.  A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: skin irritation. , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[16]  Nathalie Alépée,et al.  In vitro assessment of eye irritancy using the Reconstructed Human Corneal Epithelial SkinEthic HCE model: application to 435 substances from consumer products industry. , 2010, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[17]  N. Nishiyama,et al.  An interlaboratory study of the short time exposure (STE) test using SIRC cells for predicting eye irritation potential , 2010, Cutaneous and ocular toxicology.

[18]  M. Vinardell,et al.  Alternative methods for eye and skin irritation tests: an overview. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[19]  H. Handa,et al.  An SV40-immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line and its characterization. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  John W Harbell,et al.  Ocular Safety: A Silent (In Vitro) Success Story , 2002, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.