The ground dominance effect in the perception of 3-D layout

The relative effectiveness of the ground surface and other environmental surfaces (the ceiling and sidewalls) in determining perceived layout was investigated in five experiments and a real-world demonstration. In the first three experiments, two vertical or horizontal posts were positioned between two surfaces (ground and ceiling in all three experiments, left wall and right wall in Experiment1), and optical contact was manipulated so that the two surfaces provided contradictory information about the relative distances of the posts. Observers judged which of the two posts appeared to be closer. In Experiment 4, to control the height on the posts at which the distance judgments were made, a blue dot was attached to both vertical posts at varying heights and observers judged which dot appeared closer. In Experiment 5, the posts were replaced by two gray ellipses to eliminate the effects of the regular shape and texture. Our findings were that (1)among all four surfaces tested, observers showed a preference to respond according to the optical contact information provided by the ground surface& aground dominance effect, (2) this effect did not depend on the height of the posts in the image, (3) as the scene was tilted away from a ground/ceiling orientation, the ground dominance effect decreased, and (4) this effect was not due to the location of the judgment.

[1]  B Gillam,et al.  Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Transsaccadic perception of translating objects: effects of landmark objects and visual field position , 2002, Vision Research.

[3]  K Nakayama,et al.  Visual attention to surfaces in three-dimensional space. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Velocity gradients and relative depth perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[6]  H. Sedgwick.  Environment-Centered Representation of Spatial Layout: Available Visual Information from Texture and Perspective , 1983 .

[7]  J T Todd,et al.  Stereoscopic Discrimination of Interval and Ordinal Depth Relations on Smooth Surfaces and in Empty Space , 1998, Perception.

[8]  G J Andersen,et al.  The Perception of Depth and Slant from Texture in Three-Dimensional Scenes , 1998, Perception.

[9]  F. Phillips,et al.  The Perception of Scale-Dependent and Scale-Independent Surface Structure from Binocular Disparity, Texture, and Shading , 1998, Perception.

[10]  M L Braunstein,et al.  Perspective and the rotating trapezoid. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[11]  M. Braunstein.  Motion and texture as sources of slant information. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  G J Andersen,et al.  Relationship between binocular disparity and motion parallax in surface detection , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Asymmetry in 3-D perceptual organization: Ground-like surface superior to ceiling-like surface , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Kent A. Stevens,et al.  The Visual Interpretation of Surface Contours , 1981, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Visual attention to surfaces in 3-D space , 1995 .

[16]  S. Vecera.  The reference frame of figure-ground assignment , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  J. Todd,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceived depth as a function of relative height under three background conditions. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Surfaces versus features in visual search , 1992, Nature.

[20]  H A Sedgwick,et al.  Distance perception mediated through nested contact relations among surfaces , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[22]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance , 1998, Nature.

[23]  G. Woodman,et al.  Lower region: a new cue for figure-ground assignment. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering , 1994, Vision Research.

[25]  H A Sedgwick,et al.  Distance perception across spatial discontinuities , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  M. Braunstein,et al.  Judging Distance across Texture Discontinuities , 2003, Perception.

[27]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[28]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Apparent motion determined by surface layout not by disparity or three-dimensional distance , 1994, Nature.

[29]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[30]  J. Gibson.  The perception of the visual world , 1951 .