Priming in deduction: A spatial arrangement task

The mental model theory assumes that people reason by manipulating mental representations of states of the world, called “mental models.” In the present study we used a new deduction task based on diagrammatic premises. We show that a premise can prime other premises that induce similar mental models in a way analogous to the case of words with related meanings, which can prime one another. We present three experiments. In Experiment 1 we used an evaluation task. In Experiment 2, a construction task was used. The priming effect was obtained in both cases. In a third experiment we show that the priming effect was still present when participants were instructed to ignore a prime displayed before the premises. In all three experiments we compared determinate and indeterminate problems and found faster responses in the former.

[1]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[2]  A. Garnham,et al.  The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.

[3]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Some Empirical Justification for a Theory of Natural Propositional Logic , 1984 .

[4]  W. Schaeken,et al.  Tense, Aspect, and Temporal Reasoning , 1996 .

[5]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Propositional reasoning by model. , 1992, Psychological review.

[6]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[8]  Don Steinberg,et al.  Deductive reasoning , 1989 .

[9]  P. Johnson-Laird Illusions and models: a reply to Barrouillet and Lecas , 2000, Cognition.

[10]  R. Fazio,et al.  Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  An antidote to illusory inferences , 2000 .

[12]  M. Roberts Inspection Times and the Selection Task: Are They Relevant? , 1998 .

[13]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  A Model Theory of Modal Reasoning , 1998 .

[14]  J. S. Evans,et al.  Matching bias in the selection task. , 1973 .

[15]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  R. B. Lea,et al.  On-line evidence for elaborative logical inferences in text. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Allen Newell,et al.  Deduction as verbal reasoning. , 1995 .

[18]  M. Gernsbacher Coherence cues mapping during comprehension. , 1996 .

[19]  Ruth M. J. Byrne,et al.  Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[20]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A retrieval theory of priming in memory. , 1988, Psychological review.

[21]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[22]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth Of Logical Thinking From Childhood To Adolescence: An Essay On The Construction Of Formal Operational Structures , 1958 .

[23]  Jonathan St. B. T. Evans,et al.  Matching bias in conditional reasoning : Do we understand it after 25 years ? , 1998 .

[24]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Growth of Logical Thinking , 1959 .

[25]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Focussing in reasoning and decision making , 1993, Cognition.

[26]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Illusory inferences: a novel class of erroneous deductions , 1999, Cognition.

[27]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Human Reasoning: The Psychology Of Deduction , 1993 .

[28]  David J. Hess,et al.  Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension , 1995 .

[29]  J. Bain,et al.  Information-Processing Demands of Transitive Inference , 1986 .

[30]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[31]  J A García-Madruga,et al.  Are Conjunctive Inferences Easier than Disjunctive Inferences? A Comparison of Rules and Models , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[33]  Valerie A. Thompson,et al.  The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning , 2000, Cognition.

[34]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[35]  Tilmann Betsch,et al.  Understanding conjunction effects in probability judgments: the role of implicit mental models , 1999 .

[36]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article HOW DIAGRAMS CAN IMPROVE REASONING , 2022 .

[37]  A. Glenberg,et al.  The representation of space in mental models derived from text , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[38]  M. Roberts How Should Relevance be Defined? What Does Inspection Time Measure? A Reply to Evans , 1998 .

[39]  Vittorio Girotto,et al.  The effect of premise order in conditional reasoning: a test of the mental model theory , 1997, Cognition.

[40]  Jonathan Evans Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning , 1984 .