Inclusive Web Empirical Studies in Remote and In-Situ Settings: A User Evaluation of the RemoTest Platform

ABSTRACT Web accessibility evaluation requires tests to be carried out with real users with disabilities performing real tasks or activities. To recruit an appropriate group of users and to observe their performance in the real world is difficult. For this reason we have developed RemoTest, a platform that assists researchers designing experiments, conducting remote and in-situ experimental sessions and analyzing the data gathered while the users are accessing the Web. Although this tool is oriented to experimenters, it is necessary to check whether the evaluation environments created by RemoTest are accessible or not to the users that participate in the tests. To this end, we conducted formal in-situ evaluations with 36 users with diverse characteristics. For this assessment, the participants were asked to install the platform, to fill in some automatically created questionnaires and to carry out several web navigation tasks. From the data gathered we analyzed the ease of the installation process, the accessibility of the automatically generated questionnaires, and user satisfaction. The results revealed the suitability of the platform for conducting inclusive experiments both in remote and in-situ contexts and provided guidelines on how the experiments should be set out.

[1]  Myriam Arrue,et al.  Interdependent Components for the Development of Accessible XUL Applications for Screen Reader Users , 2014, WEBIST.

[2]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Knowing the User's Every Move – User Activity Tracking for Website Usability Evaluation and Implicit Interaction , 2006 .

[3]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Accurate measurements of pointing performance from in situ observations , 2012, CHI.

[4]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Vagner Figuerêdo de Santana,et al.  Bringing users of a digital divide context to website evaluation using WELFIT , 2010, IHC.

[6]  Myriam Arrue,et al.  Assisted Interaction Data Analysis of Web-Based User Studies , 2015, INTERACT.

[7]  M. Bradley,et al.  Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.

[8]  Andy Edmonds,et al.  Uzilla: A new tool for Web usability testing , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[9]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Developing Usability Tools and Techniques for Designing and Testing Web Sites , 1998 .

[10]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  WebQuilt : A Proxy-based Approach to Remote Web Usability Testing , 2001 .

[11]  Helen Petrie,et al.  The Evaluation of Accessibility, Usability, and User Experience , 2009, The Universal Access Handbook.

[12]  Giorgio Brajnik,et al.  Using sketches and storyboards to assess impact of age difference in user experience , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  MARC HASSENZAHL CHAPTER 3 The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product , 2003 .

[14]  Luis A. Leiva,et al.  Web browsing behavior analysis and interactive hypervideo , 2013, TWEB.

[15]  Myriam Arrue,et al.  Exploratory study of web navigation strategies for users with physical disabilities , 2014, W4A.

[16]  Mark Claypool,et al.  Implicit interest indicators , 2001, IUI '01.

[17]  Fabio Paternò,et al.  Intelligent analysis of user interactions with web applications , 2002, IUI '02.

[18]  Virpi Roto,et al.  Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach , 2009, CHI.

[19]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Beyond the Usability Lab: Conducting Large-scale Online User Experience Studies , 2009 .

[20]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 , 2008 .

[21]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Effect of Perceived Hedonic Quality on Product Appealingness , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Caroline Jay,et al.  Understanding users in the wild , 2013, W4A.