Factors Influencing Power Hand Tool Fastening Accuracy and Reaction Forces

Objective: A laboratory study investigated the relationship between power hand tool and task-related factors affecting threaded fastener torque accuracy and associated handle reaction force. Background: We previously developed a biodynamic model to predict handle reaction forces. We hypothesized that torque accuracy was related to the same factors that affect operator capacity to react against impulsive tool forces, as predicted by the model. Method: The independent variables included tool (pistol grip on a vertical surface, right angle on a horizontal surface), fastener torque rate (hard, soft), horizontal distance (30 cm and 60 cm), and vertical distance (80 cm, 110 cm, and 140 cm). Ten participants (five male and five female) fastened 12 similar bolts for each experimental condition. Results: Average torque error (audited − target torque) was affected by fastener torque rate and operator position. Torque error decreased 33% for soft torque rates, whereas handle forces greatly increased (170%). Torque error also decreased for the far horizontal distance 7% to 14%, when vertical distance was in the middle or high, but handle force decreased slightly 3% to 5%. Conclusion: The evidence suggests that although both tool and task factors affect fastening accuracy, they each influence handle reaction forces differently. We conclude that these differences are attributed to different parameters each factor influences affecting the dynamics of threaded faster tool operation. Fastener torque rate affects the tool dynamics, whereas posture affects the spring-mass-damping biodynamic properties of the human operator. Application: The prediction of handle reaction force using an operator biodynamic model may be useful for codifying complex and unobvious relationships between tool and task factors for minimizing torque error while controlling handle force.

[1]  T. G. Richard,et al.  Dynamic biomechanical model of the hand and arm in pistol grip power handtool usage , 2001 .

[2]  Robert G. Radwin,et al.  A Dynamic Mechanical Model for Hand Force in Right Angle Nutrunner Operation , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[3]  B Lindqvist,et al.  Torque reaction in angled nutrunners. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  MR Johnson,et al.  Comparing the Effects of Two Controller Algorithms on DC Torque Tool Operators , 2008 .

[5]  風間 真人,et al.  Power hand tool , 2011 .

[6]  R G Radwin,et al.  The influence of target torque and torque build-up time on physical stress in right angle nutrunner operation. , 1998, Ergonomics.

[7]  Jia-Hua Lin,et al.  A single-degree-of-freedom dynamic model predicts the range of human responses to impulsive forces produced by power hand tools. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Power Hand Tool Kinetics Associated with Upper Limb Injuries in an Automobile Assembly Plant , 2007, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[9]  Jia-Hua Lin,et al.  Ergonomics Applications of a Mechanical Model of the Human Operator in Power Hand Tool Operation , 2005, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[10]  L Lindbeck,et al.  Pneumatic tool torque reaction: reaction forces, displacement, muscle activity and discomfort in the hand-arm system. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Seoungyeon Oh,et al.  The effects of power hand tool dynamics and workstation design on handle kinematics and muscle activity , 1997 .

[12]  T. Armstrong,et al.  Muscle response to pneumatic hand tool torque reaction forces. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[13]  T Armstrong,et al.  Muscle responses to simulated torque reactions of hand-held power tools. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[14]  J Eklund,et al.  Reaction torques and operator stress while using powered nutrunners. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.