Use of descriptors based on moments from digital images for tool wear monitoring

Abstract The widely used criteria to determine the need for tool replacement are too much conservative. The consequence is that tools are only used for a small fraction of their possible useful life. The economical influence of tool replacement costs over total production costs demands better criteria according to current technology. The use of different moments to describe tool wear images and to classify the tool condition in wear classes has been studied. The moments used as descriptors in this paper show different behavior with regard to wear identification, concluding that Hu and Legendre descriptors provide the best performance. These descriptors have been classified using a finite mixture mclust model considering three wear classes (low, medium and high). The achieved results from the clustering have been checked by means of discriminant analysis techniques, linear and quadratic, using the Fowlkes–Mallow index as quality factor. The projection of image data by means of linear discriminant analysis provides useful wear maps for tool monitoring. These wear maps show us the wear classes and the frontiers among them, in such a way that wear evolution for current tool can be mapped. The quadratic discriminant analysis allows us to assign to the current tool, a probability of belonging to a wear class. This probability is used as a new wear criterion in substitution of the current conservative criteria, making possible to reduce tool replacement costs.

[1]  Roland T. Chin,et al.  On Image Analysis by the Methods of Moments , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Janez Kopac,et al.  Tool wear monitoring during the turning process , 2001 .

[3]  Enrique Alegre,et al.  On-line tool wear monitoring using geometric descriptors from digital images , 2007 .

[4]  Colin Bradley,et al.  A review of machine vision sensors for tool condition monitoring , 1997 .

[5]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[6]  H. Shao,et al.  A cutting power model for tool wear monitoring in milling , 2004 .

[7]  Bernhard Sick,et al.  ON-LINE AND INDIRECT TOOL WEAR MONITORING IN TURNING WITH ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS: A REVIEW OF MORE THAN A DECADE OF RESEARCH , 2002 .

[8]  Ana González-Marcos,et al.  TAO-robust backpropagation learning algorithm , 2005, Neural Networks.

[9]  Roberto Teti,et al.  Machining of Composite Materials , 2002 .

[10]  Francisco Ortega,et al.  Importance of information pre‐processing in the improvement of neural network results* , 1996 .

[11]  Ming-Kuei Hu,et al.  Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[12]  Chen Ming,et al.  On-line tool breakage monitoring in turning , 2003 .

[13]  Whoi-Yul Kim,et al.  A practical pattern recognition system for translation, scale and rotation invariance , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  J. Taboada Castro,et al.  Optimizing of stripping in a slate bank , 1994 .

[15]  A. Weckenmann,et al.  Precision Measurement of Cutting Tools with two Matched Optical 3D-Sensors , 2003 .

[16]  Colin Bradley,et al.  A machine vision system for tool wear assessment , 1997 .

[17]  Anwar Khalil Sheikh,et al.  Use of electrical power for online monitoring of tool condition , 2005 .

[18]  Hélène Laurent,et al.  Comparison of invariant descriptors for object recognition , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[19]  Michele Lanzetta,et al.  A new flexible high-resolution vision sensor for tool condition monitoring , 2001 .

[20]  Wenhui Wang,et al.  Flank wear measurement by a threshold independent method with sub-pixel accuracy , 2006 .

[21]  G. Taubin,et al.  Object recognition based on moment (or algebraic) invariants , 1992 .

[22]  Joaquín B. Ordieres Meré,et al.  Estimation of mechanical properties of steel strip in hot dip galvanising lines , 2004 .

[23]  A. Raftery,et al.  Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering , 1993 .

[24]  Janez Kopac,et al.  New approach in tool wear measuring technique using CCD vision system , 2005 .

[25]  Amiya R Mohanty,et al.  Estimation of tool wear during CNC milling using neural network-based sensor fusion , 2007 .

[26]  M. Sortino,et al.  Application of statistical filtering for optical detection of tool wear , 2003 .

[27]  Elso Kuljanić,et al.  TWEM, a method based on cutting forces—monitoring tool wear in face milling , 2005 .

[28]  P. S. Heyns,et al.  An industrial tool wear monitoring system for interrupted turning , 2004 .

[29]  Toshiyuki Obikawa,et al.  Monitoring of flank wear of coated tools in high speed machining with a neural network ART2 , 2004 .

[30]  Józef Jonak,et al.  Utilisation of neural networks to identify the status of the cutting tool point , 2006 .

[31]  Kate Fox,et al.  Process monitoring to assist the workpiece surface quality in machining , 2004 .

[32]  G. H. Lim,et al.  Tool-wear monitoring in machine turning , 1995 .

[33]  Enrique Alegre,et al.  Design of a Computer Vision System to Estimate Tool Wearing , 2006 .

[34]  S. K. Choudhury,et al.  Tool wear prediction in turning , 2004 .

[35]  Guy Littlefair,et al.  Fusion of integrated multisensor data for tool wear monitoring , 1995, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[36]  G. McLachlan Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1992 .

[37]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[38]  Alireza Khotanzad,et al.  Invariant Image Recognition by Zernike Moments , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[39]  J. Flusser,et al.  Invariant-based registration of rotated and blurred images , 1999, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS'99 (Cat. No.99CH36293).

[40]  W. Wang,et al.  Flank wear measurement by successive image analysis , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[41]  D. R. Salgado,et al.  Tool wear detection in turning operations using singular spectrum analysis , 2006 .

[42]  J. Kasac,et al.  Tool wear monitoring using radial basis function neural network , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[43]  Fengfeng Xi,et al.  Detection and compensation of cutting tool wear based on Lipschitz exponent , 2005, Proceedings of 2005 IEEE Conference on Control Applications, 2005. CCA 2005..

[44]  M. Cemal Cakir,et al.  Detecting tool breakage in turning aisi 1050 steel using coated and uncoated cutting tools , 2005 .

[45]  Mathieu Ritou,et al.  A new versatile in-process monitoring system for milling , 2006, 1309.3915.

[46]  Richard J. Prokop,et al.  A survey of moment-based techniques for unoccluded object representation and recognition , 1992, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[47]  G. McLachlan,et al.  The EM algorithm and extensions , 1996 .

[48]  C. González Nicieza,et al.  Generalization of the influence function method in mining subsidence , 1996 .

[49]  V.T. Sunil Elanagar,et al.  Design and implementation of tool wear monitoring with radial basis function neural networks , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.