Assessing urban ecosystem services in support of spatial planning in the Hague, the Netherlands

Abstract Green infrastructure (GI) is increasingly addressed in urban planning and research to enhance urban sustainability and resilience through the provisioning of ecosystem services (ES). Yet, few applications exist of planning models for multifunctional GI in high spatial and thematic detail that simultaneously align with stakeholder interests. We address these gaps by developing and presenting a spatially explicit model to inform urban planners on priority areas for multifunctional GI development. This model was made possible by spatial analyses on multiple scales, enabling us to assess ES in sufficient detail, while simultaneously matching the preferences for scale and ES-indicators of decision makers and urban planners. The model involves a novel weighting scheme based upon the local capacity of GI to mitigate problems. We applied our model to the city of The Hague using a set of three policy-relevant problems: air pollution, the urban heat island effect and storm water flooding. Our results show that the capacity of GI to mitigate these problems varies spatially, both within and between ES, and depends on local characteristics of GI and the environmental context. We illustrate the relevance of using a multi-scale approach in spatial ES analysis, and underline that GI planning measures should be assessed in high spatial detail due to their often locally distinct ES capacity. Our approach makes important strides towards the deployment of nature-based solutions for urban challenges in the light of demands for increasing resilience and sustainability.

[1]  Helena Madureira,et al.  Planning for multifunctional urban green infrastructures: Promises and challenges , 2014 .

[2]  N. Seddon,et al.  Grounding nature-based climate solutions in sound biodiversity science , 2019, Nature Climate Change.

[3]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Future projections of biodiversity and ecosystem services in Europe with two integrated assessment models , 2020, Regional Environmental Change.

[4]  J. Ahern From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world , 2011 .

[5]  F. Escobedo,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest , 2009 .

[6]  K. Grunewald,et al.  Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[7]  Yuanzheng Li,et al.  Evaluating Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Residential Green Spaces From the Perspective of Residents' Satisfaction With Green Space , 2020, Frontiers in Public Health.

[8]  P. Bocquier WORLD URBANIZATION PROSPECTS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE UN MODEL OF PROJECTION COMPATIBLE WITH URBAN TRANSITION THEORY 1 , 2005 .

[9]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  Assessing climate impacts of planning policies—An estimation for the urban region of Leipzig (Germany) , 2011 .

[10]  S. Pauleit,et al.  From Multifunctionality to Multiple Ecosystem Services? A Conceptual Framework for Multifunctionality in Green Infrastructure Planning for Urban Areas , 2014, AMBIO.

[11]  Sara Meerow A green infrastructure spatial planning model for evaluating ecosystem service tradeoffs and synergies across three coastal megacities , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[12]  K. Seto,et al.  A Global Outlook on Urbanization , 2013 .

[13]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States , 2006 .

[14]  K. Jax,et al.  Requirements for the selection of ecosystem service indicators – The case of MAES indicators , 2016 .

[15]  Zoé A. Hamstead,et al.  Urban Ecosystem Services , 2021, Urban Ecology for Citizens and Planners.

[16]  K. P. Sharma,et al.  Urban Neighborhood Green Index – A measure of green spaces in urban areas , 2012 .

[17]  Robert E. Hoehn,et al.  Assessing how green space types affect ecosystem services delivery in Porto, Portugal , 2018 .

[18]  S. Pauleit,et al.  Crown size and growing space requirement of common tree species in urban centres, parks, and forests , 2015 .

[19]  T. Elmqvist Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services : challenges and opportunities : a global assessment : a part of the cities and biodiversity outlook project , 2013 .

[20]  Emmanuelle Cohen-Shacham,et al.  Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges , 2016 .

[21]  R. M. Elliott,et al.  Identifying linkages between urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services using an expert opinion methodology , 2019, Ambio.

[22]  R. Costanza,et al.  Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  N. Frantzeskaki,et al.  Resilience of and through urban ecosystem services , 2015 .

[24]  Zoé A. Hamstead,et al.  The value of urban ecosystem services in New York City: A spatially explicit multicriteria analysis of landscape scale valuation scenarios , 2016 .

[25]  Stephan Pauleit,et al.  Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: What is the state of practice? , 2017, Ecological Indicators.

[26]  P. Verburg,et al.  REVIEW: Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high‐resolution data of urban green space: an assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands , 2015 .

[27]  Sara Meerow,et al.  Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit , 2017 .

[28]  Steffen Lauf,et al.  Balancing demand and supply of multiple urban ecosystem services on different spatial scales , 2016 .

[29]  Sara Meerow The politics of multifunctional green infrastructure planning in New York City , 2020 .

[30]  Lincoln R. Larson,et al.  Advancing Sustainability through Urban Green Space: Cultural Ecosystem Services, Equity, and Social Determinants of Health , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[31]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments , 2011 .

[32]  Malcolm D. Hudson,et al.  An evaluation of flood control and urban cooling ecosystem services delivered by urban green infrastructure , 2013 .

[33]  W. Klemm,et al.  Street greenery and its physical and psychological impact on outdoor thermal comfort , 2015 .

[34]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: Insights for landscape planning and management , 2017 .

[35]  T. McPhearson,et al.  Scale and context dependence of ecosystem service providing units , 2015 .

[36]  P. Bodegom,et al.  Analyzing temporal changes in urban forest structure and the effect on air quality improvement , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[37]  D. Geneletti,et al.  Ecosystem services in urban plans: What is there, and what is still needed for better decisions , 2018 .

[38]  Jaan-Henrik Kain,et al.  Key insights for the future of urban ecosystem services research , 2016 .

[39]  David J. Nowak,et al.  Air pollution removal by Chicago's urban forest , 1994 .

[40]  Martina Artmann,et al.  A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation , 2014, AMBIO.

[41]  Barbara Schröter,et al.  Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? , 2019, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[42]  Michael H. Finewood,et al.  Green Infrastructure and the Hidden Politics of Urban Stormwater Governance in a Postindustrial City , 2019, Annals of the American Association of Geographers.

[43]  N. Hanan,et al.  Global Hydrologic Soil Groups (HYSOGs250m) for Curve Number-Based Runoff Modeling , 2018 .

[44]  Gherardo Chirici,et al.  Air Pollution Removal by Green Infrastructures and Urban Forests in the City of Florence , 2016 .