Effective Teaching Behaviors in the College Classroom: A Critical Incident Technique from Students' Perspective.

Teaching is a multidimensional, complex activity. The use of the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) has the potential to be effective in improving teaching as it reveals successful behaviors by identifying key actions associated between excellent/poor performances. The present study sought to identify teaching behaviors that differentiate excellent and very poor performance of undergraduate college teachers in India using CIT, from the perspective of students. Two hundred thirty-seven critical incidents were collected from 60 female students from three different undergraduate humanities courses using questionnaires and personal interviews. Qualitative procedures emphasizing the verbatims students generated were used for data analysis. The data generated from the incidents was subjected to content analysis, and sorted into 6 categories. The six categories identified were: rapport with students, course preparation and delivery, encouragement, fairness, spending time with students outside of class, and control. The frequency with which students reported each behavior as either good or bad is presented. The study yields specific behaviors for faculty to follow to yield improvement in teaching evaluations by students. A list of critical behaviors may have implications in selection, training and performance evaluation of teachers. The present study also underlines the robustness of CIT in education research.

[1]  K. Feldman Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration , 1987 .

[2]  John A. Centra,et al.  Determining faculty effectiveness : [assessing teaching, research, and service for personnel decisions and improvement] , 2003 .

[3]  Kenneth A. Feldman,et al.  The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies , 1989 .

[4]  D. Bligh Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[5]  A. Greenwald Validity concerns and usefulness of student ratings of instruction. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[6]  William R. Latham Description of the data base , 1976 .

[7]  H. Marsh,et al.  Making students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: The critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. , 1997 .

[8]  Lawrence M. Aleamoni,et al.  Student Ratings of Instruction , 1981 .

[9]  Suzanne Young,et al.  Profiles of Effective College and University Teachers , 1999 .

[10]  Sudhir Kakar,et al.  Authority Patterns and Subordinate Behavior in Indian Organizations , 1971 .

[11]  H. G. Murray,et al.  Using Multiple Outcomes to Validate Student Ratings of Overall Teacher Effectiveness. , 1995 .

[12]  K. Fernow New York , 1896, American Potato Journal.

[13]  J. Kanungo Context Sensitivity and Balancing in Indian Organizational Behaviour , 1997 .

[14]  C. Finch,et al.  Importance of On-the-Job Experiences in Developing Leadership Capabilities. , 1997 .

[15]  Steven Stack,et al.  Research Productivity and Student Evaluation of Teaching in Social Science Classes: A Research Note , 2003 .

[16]  Cayla R. Teal,et al.  The Dimensions of Students’ Perceptions of Teaching Effectiveness , 1999 .

[17]  Vincent S. Di Salvo,et al.  Theory and Practice , 1989 .

[18]  Michael G. Aamodt,et al.  A Critical-Incident Job Analysis of the University Housing Resident Assistant Position , 1981 .

[19]  P. Abrami,et al.  The student ratings debate : are they valid? : how can we best use them? , 2001 .

[20]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Student Ratings of Instruction , 1974 .

[21]  H. Marsh Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness , 1984 .

[22]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Do grades contaminate student evaluations of instruction? , 1982 .

[23]  P. Abrami,et al.  Navigating student ratings of instruction. , 1997 .

[24]  A. Roland In Search of Self in India and Japan , 1989 .

[25]  P. Varca,et al.  ATTAINING TEACHING EXCELLENCE: A CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2001 .

[26]  B. Doebbeling,et al.  Critical incidents of nonadherence with standard precautions guidelines among community hospital-based health care workers , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[27]  P. Ramsden Learning to Teach in Higher Education , 1991 .

[28]  Robert D. Miewald Administrative Science Quarterly , 1981 .

[29]  W. McKeachie Student ratings: The validity of use. , 1997 .

[30]  H. Marsh Students ' Evaluations of University Teaching : Dimensionality , Reliability , Validity , Potential Biases , and Utility , 2005 .

[31]  Instructor Guie,et al.  The National Center for Research in Vocational Education , 1983 .

[32]  Raymond P. Perry,et al.  Effective teaching in higher education : research and practice , 1997 .

[33]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis of Research on Class Size and Its Relationship to Attitudes and Instruction , 1980 .

[34]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  No Pain , No Gain ? The Importance of Measuring Course Workload in Student Ratings of Instruction , 1997 .

[35]  B. Fridlund,et al.  Cancer patients' experiences of nurses' behaviour and health promotion activities: a critical incident analysis. , 1999, European journal of cancer care.

[36]  H. G. Murray,et al.  Interfaculty differences in classroom teaching behaviors and their relationship to student instructional ratings , 1986 .

[37]  J. Ware,et al.  Effects of expressiveness, content coverage, and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: new interpretations of the Dr. Fox effect , 1982 .

[38]  P. Trout What the Numbers Mean: Providing a Context for Numerical Student Evaluations of Courses. , 1997 .

[39]  P. A. Cohen Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies , 1981 .

[40]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[41]  K. Feldman The superior college teacher from the students' view , 1976 .

[42]  J. Owens,et al.  A critical incident study of nurses' responses to the spiritual needs of their patients. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[43]  Sudhir Kakar The Inner World: A Psychoanalytic Study of Childhood and Society in India , 1978 .

[44]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses , 1990 .

[45]  On the Relationship between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness at Research Universities. , 2007 .

[46]  K. Feldman Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Ratings 1 , 2007 .

[47]  B. Schmidt Teachers' Roles in the Integration of Vocational and Academic Education. , 1992 .

[48]  D Arthur,et al.  Nursing competencies: personal characteristics contributing to effective nursing performance. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[49]  Sudhir Kakar,et al.  The Inner World: A Psycho-Analytic Study of Childhood and Society in India. , 1979, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[50]  John C. Ory,et al.  Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness: A Practical Guide , 1984 .

[51]  Triangulating the relationships among publication productivity, teaching effectiveness, and student achievement , 1996 .

[52]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  The Influence of Student, Course, and Instructor Characteristics in Evaluations of University Teaching , 1980 .

[53]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom , 1998 .

[54]  William E. Cashin Student Ratings of Teaching: The Research Revisited , 1982 .

[55]  Kenneth A. Feldman,et al.  The perceived instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics: A review and synthesis , 1986 .

[56]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[57]  Joseph J. Stevens,et al.  The use of evaluative feedback for instructional improvement: A longitudinal perspective , 1984 .

[58]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Effects of Grading Leniency and Low Workload on Students' Evaluations of Teaching: Popular Myth, Bias, Validity, or Innocent Bystanders? , 2000 .