Geopolymers as an Alternative for Oil Well Cementing Applications: A Review of Advantages and Concerns

Geopolymers, being inorganic polymers created from rock sources, were evaluated as an alternative to Portland cement. To evaluate their usability, some properties of a selected geopolymer were measured and compared with those from a neat class G Portland cement. The geopolymeric slurries showed a non-Newtonian viscosity behavior with a measurable, albeit low, yield stress. The pumpability measurements using atmospheric and pressurized consistometer showed an adequate set profile for both the geopolymer and cement sample. Static fluid loss test shows that the geopolymeric slurries experienced a lower fluid loss compared to that of the Portland cement. The shrinkage factor for the geopolymers was reduced (expanded) as the downhole temperature was ramped up. The shrinkage of the Portland cement sample proceeded only with a lower rate. Tensile strength of the geopolymers was approximately 5% of their compressive strength; however, this value for Portland cement was approximately 10% of its compressive strength. Finally, shear bond strength of geopolymers would benefit from improvement.

[1]  Tao Yu,et al.  Factors Affecting the Bond Strength Between the Fly Ash-based Geopolymer Concrete and Steel Reinforcement , 2018, Structures.

[2]  Arild Saasen,et al.  Long-term durability of rock-based geopolymers aged at downhole conditions for oil well cementing operations , 2017 .

[3]  A. Saasen,et al.  Usability of Geopolymers for Oil Well Cementing Applications: Reaction Mechanisms, Pumpability, and Properties , 2016 .

[4]  S. Nair,et al.  Solidification of Synthetic-Based Drilling Mud Using Geopolymers , 2016 .

[5]  Torbjørn Vrålstad,et al.  Experimental study on the synthesis and characterization of aplite rock-based geopolymers , 2016 .

[6]  Venkata Gopala Rao Palla,et al.  Measurement Procedures and Analysis of Fluid Invasion Drivers During Cement Hydration , 2016 .

[7]  Mahmoud Khalifeh,et al.  Materials for optimized P&A performance: Potential utilization of geopolymers , 2016 .

[8]  Alexandre Lavrov,et al.  Integrity of Downscaled Well Models Subject to Cooling , 2016 .

[9]  Mohammad Jamal Khattak,et al.  Development of Geopolymer-based Cement Slurries with Enhanced Thickening Time, Compressive and Shear Bond Strength and Durability , 2016 .

[10]  A. Saasen,et al.  Cap Rock Restoration in Plug and Abandonment Operations; Possible Utilization of Rock-based Geopolymers for Permanent Zonal Isolation and Well Plugging , 2015 .

[11]  M. B. Dusseault,et al.  Wellbore Stress Changes and Microannulus Development Because of Cement Shrinkage , 2015 .

[12]  Arild Saasen,et al.  Cap Rock Restoration in Plug and Abandonment Operations; Possible Utilization of Aplite-Based Geopolymers for Permanent Zonal Isolation and Well Plugging , 2015 .

[13]  Arild Saasen,et al.  Potential Utilization of Geopolymers in Plug and Abandonment Operations , 2014 .

[14]  J. Davidovits Geopolymer chemistry and applications , 2008 .

[15]  Fatemeh K. Saleh,et al.  Study and Use of Geopolymer Mixtures for Oil and Gas Well Cementing Applications , 2018 .

[16]  S. Salehi,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of fly ash geopolymer cement slurries: Implications for oil and gas wells cementing applications , 2017 .

[17]  A. Wojtanowicz,et al.  A model of hydrostatic pressure loss in wells after cement placement , 2002 .

[18]  J-F. Baret,et al.  Why Cement Fluid Loss Additives Are Necessary , 1988 .