Conformational landscape of the p28-bound human proteasome regulatory particle

The proteasome holoenzyme is activated by its regulatory particle (RP) consisting of two subcomplexes, the lid and the base. A key event in base assembly is the formation of a heterohexameric ring of AAA-ATPases, which is guided by at least four RP assembly chaperones in mammals: PAAF1, p28/gankyrin, p27/PSMD9 and S5b. We determined a cryo-EM structure of the human RP in complex with its assembly chaperone p28 at 4.5-Å resolution. The Rpn1-p28-AAA subcomplex in the p28-bound RP is highly dynamic and was resolved to subnanometer resolution in seven states, which recapitulate the conformational landscape of the complex. Surprisingly, the p28-bound AAA ring does not form a channel in the free RP. Instead, it spontaneously samples multiple ‘open’ and ‘closed’ topologies. Our analysis suggests that p28 guides the proteolytic core particle to select certain conformation of the ATPase ring for RP engagement in the last step of the chaperone-mediated proteasome assembly.

[1]  Anchi Cheng,et al.  Automated molecular microscopy: the new Leginon system. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[2]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly , 2009, Nature.

[3]  Friedrich Förster,et al.  Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  N. Grigorieff,et al.  Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[5]  Friedrich Förster,et al.  Deep classification of a large cryo-EM dataset defines the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Andreas Martin,et al.  Structure of the Rpn11–Rpn8 dimer reveals mechanisms of substrate deubiquitination during proteasomal degradation , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[7]  A. Horwich,et al.  Global unfolding of a substrate protein by the Hsp100 chaperone ClpA , 1999, Nature.

[8]  Yigong Shi,et al.  Mechanism of substrate unfolding and translocation by the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[9]  Peter R. Baker,et al.  Mass spectrometric characterization of the affinity-purified human 26S proteasome complex. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[10]  W. Baumeister,et al.  A Subcomplex of the Proteasome Regulatory Particle Required for Ubiquitin-Conjugate Degradation and Related to the COP9-Signalosome and eIF3 , 1998, Cell.

[11]  Yigong Shi,et al.  Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. , 2009, Molecular cell.

[12]  D. Finley,et al.  Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. , 2009, Annual review of biochemistry.

[13]  F. Förster,et al.  Crystal structure of the proteasomal deubiquitylation module Rpn8-Rpn11 , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Wen Jiang,et al.  EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[15]  Yigong Shi,et al.  An atomic structure of the human 26S proteasome , 2016, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[16]  D. Finley,et al.  Assembly manual for the proteasome regulatory particle: the first draft. , 2010, Biochemical Society transactions.

[17]  Masami Horikoshi,et al.  Structural basis for the recognition between the regulatory particles Nas6 and Rpt3 of the yeast 26S proteasome. , 2007, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[18]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[19]  Sjors H.W. Scheres,et al.  RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination , 2012, Journal of structural biology.

[20]  Bevin Brett,et al.  Unsupervised single-particle deep classification via statistical manifold learning , 2016, ArXiv.

[21]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Structure of the human 26S proteasome at a resolution of 3.9 Å , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  T. Yao,et al.  A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome , 2002, Nature.

[23]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Assembly Pathway of the Mammalian Proteasome Base Subcomplex Is Mediated by Multiple Specific Chaperones , 2009, Cell.

[24]  K. Henrick,et al.  Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  S. Krzywda,et al.  The Crystal Structure of Gankyrin, an Oncoprotein Found in Complexes with Cyclin-dependent Kinase 4, a 19 S Proteasomal ATPase Regulator, and the Tumor Suppressors Rb and p53* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Hemant D. Tagare,et al.  The Local Resolution of Cryo-EM Density Maps , 2013, Nature Methods.

[28]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  Molecular architecture and assembly of the eukaryotic proteasome. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[29]  Sjors H.W. Scheres,et al.  A Bayesian View on Cryo-EM Structure Determination , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[30]  E. Morris,et al.  Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[31]  Lan Huang,et al.  An Integrated Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomic Approach , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[32]  Yoshihide Hayashizaki,et al.  Structure of the oncoprotein gankyrin in complex with S6 ATPase of the 26S proteasome. , 2007, Structure.

[33]  V. Verkhusha,et al.  Near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor in vivo imaging , 2013, Nature Methods.

[34]  J. Frank,et al.  SPIDER image processing for single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules from electron micrographs , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[35]  F. Förster,et al.  Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Andreas Martin,et al.  Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[37]  Andreas Martin,et al.  Atomic structure of the 26S proteasome lid reveals the mechanism of deubiquitinase inhibition , 2016, eLife.

[38]  Jane Clarke,et al.  Experimental evidence for a frustrated energy landscape in a 3-helix bundle protein family , 2009, Nature.

[39]  S. Gygi,et al.  Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C-termini , 2009, Nature.

[40]  Youdong Mao,et al.  Structural basis for dynamic regulation of the human 26S proteasome , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Yifan Cheng,et al.  Reconfiguration of the proteasome during chaperone-mediated assembly , 2013, Nature.

[42]  Gabriel C. Lander,et al.  Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle , 2011, Nature.

[43]  L. Aravind,et al.  Role of Rpn11 Metalloprotease in Deubiquitination and Degradation by the 26S Proteasome , 2002, Science.

[44]  Yigong Shi,et al.  Structure of an endogenous yeast 26S proteasome reveals two major conformational states , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.