The impact of shale gas on the cost and feasibility of meeting climate targets - a global energy system model analysis and an exploration of uncertainties

There exists considerable uncertainty over both shale and conventional gas resource availability and extraction costs, as well as the fugitive methane emissions associated with shale gas extraction and its possible role in mitigating climate change. This study uses a multi-region energy system model, TIAM (TIMES integrated assessment model), to consider the impact of a range of conventional and shale gas cost and availability assessments on mitigation scenarios aimed at achieving a limit to global warming of below 2 °C in 2100, with a 50% likelihood. When adding shale gas to the global energy mix, the reduction to the global energy system cost is relatively small (up to 0.4%), and the mitigation cost increases by 1%–3% under all cost assumptions. The impact of a “dash for shale gas”, of unavailability of carbon capture and storage, of increased barriers to investment in low carbon technologies, and of higher than expected leakage rates, are also considered; and are each found to have the potential to increase the cost and reduce feasibility of meeting global temperature goals. We conclude that the extraction of shale gas is not likely to significantly reduce the effort required to mitigate climate change under globally coordinated action, but could increase required mitigation effort if not handled sufficiently carefully.

[1]  Allen L Robinson,et al.  Methane Emissions from Conventional and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Sites in the Marcellus Shale Basin. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Shale gas production: potential versus actual greenhouse gas emissions , 2012 .

[3]  Touché Howard,et al.  University of Texas study underestimates national methane emissions at natural gas production sites due to instrument sensor failure , 2015 .

[4]  Mason Inman.  Natural gas: The fracking fallacy , 2014, Nature.

[5]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  The Contribution of Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Mitigation to Achieving Long-Term Temperature Goals , 2017 .

[6]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  UK public perceptions of shale gas hydraulic fracturing: The role of audience, message and contextual factors on risk perceptions and policy support , 2015 .

[7]  Jeff Peischl,et al.  Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions , 2015 .

[8]  Colm Sweeney,et al.  Aircraft-Based Measurements of Point Source Methane Emissions in the Barnett Shale Basin. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  James Thomas,et al.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Scot M. Miller,et al.  Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  C. E. McGlade,et al.  Uncertainties in the outlook for oil and gas , 2014 .

[12]  L. Clarke,et al.  International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios , 2009 .

[13]  Christophe McGlade,et al.  Methods of estimating shale gas resources – Comparison, evaluation and implications , 2013 .

[14]  Monique Hoogwijk,et al.  Energy Resources and Potentials , 2012 .

[15]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.

[16]  James R. McFarland,et al.  Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? , 2015, Science.

[17]  Christophe McGlade,et al.  Unconventional gas - A review of regional and global resource estimates , 2013 .

[18]  Svetlana Ikonnikova,et al.  Well economics across ten tiers in low and high Btu (British thermal unit) areas, Barnett Shale, Texas , 2013 .

[19]  O. Schneising,et al.  Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geologic formations , 2014 .

[20]  Robert W Howarth,et al.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Anthony J. Marchese,et al.  Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Pinault.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing: Positive Feedbacks , 2018, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering.

[23]  J. D. Hughes,et al.  Energy: A reality check on the shale revolution , 2013, Nature.

[24]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges , 2014 .

[25]  Barack Obama,et al.  Remarks by the President in State of the Union Address: January 20, 2015 , 2015 .

[26]  Robert J. Brecha,et al.  Boom or bust? Mapping out the known unknowns of global shale gas production potential , 2015 .

[27]  Gabrielle Pétron,et al.  Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field , 2013 .

[28]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas , 2014, Nature.

[29]  S. Gamper-Rabindran.  Information Collection, Access, and Dissemination to Support Evidence‐Based Shale Gas Policies , 2014 .

[30]  H. Rogner.  AN ASSESSMENT OF WORLD HYDROCARBON RESOURCES , 1997 .

[31]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Assessing the challenges of global long-term mitigation scenarios , 2015 .

[32]  A. Ingraffea,et al.  Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations , 2011 .

[33]  P. Ekins,et al.  The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C , 2015, Nature.

[34]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  ETSAP-TIAM: the TIMES integrated assessment model Part I: Model structure , 2008, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[35]  John P. Weyant,et al.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.

[36]  Global Energy Assessment Writing Team.  Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[37]  T. Stephenson,et al.  Modeling the Relative GHG Emissions of Conventional and Shale Gas Production , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[38]  Touché Howard,et al.  Sensor transition failure in the high flow sampler: Implications for methane emission inventories of natural gas infrastructure , 2015, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[39]  Maryse Labriet,et al.  Deterministic and stochastic analysis of alternative climate targets under differentiated cooperation regimes , 2009 .

[40]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  The Influence of Shale Gas on U.S. Energy and Environmental Policy , 2012 .

[41]  Matt Harrison,et al.  Response to comment on "Methane emissions from process equipment at natural gas production sites in the United States: pneumatic controllers". , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Steven J. Davis,et al.  Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013 , 2015, Nature Communications.

[43]  F. Gracceva,et al.  Exploring the uncertainty around potential shale gas development – A global energy system analysis based on TIAM (TIMES Integrated Assessment Model) , 2013 .

[44]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.