Optimisation and comparison of three PCR procedures for molecular identification of Taenia solium

Abstract The aim of the study was to optimise selected PCR methods for identification of T. solium, and to compare their effectiveness and usefulness. The investigation concerned three PCR methods described earlier: PCR I (specific to oncospherespecific protein Tso31 gene), PCR II (specific to large subunit rRNA gene), and PCR III (cytochrome c oxidases ubunit 1 gene). Each of them needed optimisation in connection with some changes in the procedures. Among the examined procedures, PCR I was found to be the most useful, requiring the least corrections during optimisation - only a higher concentration of polymerase was necessary. Testing an optimised PCR II method showed strong unspecific reactions with E. granulosus and T. saginata. This method was not considered diagnostically useful in distinguishing T. solium. PCR III method yielded products only when annealing temperature was lowered by 2 C. Under such conditions, there were no unspecific reactions with three others Taenidae parasites; however, annealing at a temperature only 1oC lower generated a distinct unspecific PCR product from T. saginata DNA. Therefore, this method was of limited usefulness. Comparison of the effectiveness of the two selected methods (PCR I and III) in detection of T. solium in successive DNA dilutions showed a large difference between them: in the same DNA sample, PCR I showed positive results in a sample diluted 1:3200, while PCR III failed at dilutions greater than 1:50. The results showed that among the three different methods used in the investigations, the most specific and effective for identification of T. solium was PCR I.

[1]  K. Mwape,et al.  Bayesian modelling to estimate the test characteristics of coprology, coproantigen ELISA and a novel real‐time PCR for the diagnosis of taeniasis , 2013, Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH.

[2]  J. Sroka,et al.  The first detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in slaughtered pigs in Poland. , 2012, Veterinary parasitology.

[3]  K. V. Subramanyam,et al.  PCR test for detecting Taenia solium cysticercosis in pig carcasses , 2011, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[4]  A. Sobolewska,et al.  [Evaluation of epidemiological situation of cestode infections in Poland in the years 1997-2006 on the basis of data from san-epid stations]. , 2010, Przeglad epidemiologiczny.

[5]  J. Zunt,et al.  Diagnosis of neurocysticercosis by detection of Taenia solium DNA using a global DNA screening platform. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  Z. Pawłowski Control of neurocysticercosis by routine medical and veterinary services. , 2008, Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

[7]  R. H. Peralta,et al.  Comparative evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of Taenia solium cysticercosis in swine with low parasite burden. , 2007, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.

[8]  Guido Fontgalland Coelho Linhares,et al.  Diferenciação específica entre Taenia saginata e Taenia solium por ensaio de PCR e duplex-PCR , 2006 .

[9]  Z. Pawłowski,et al.  Control of Taenia solium taeniasis/cysticercosis: from research towards implementation. , 2005, International journal for parasitology.

[10]  H. H. García,et al.  Neurocysticercosis: updated concepts about an old disease , 2005, The Lancet Neurology.

[11]  C. Kapel,et al.  Experimental alveolar echinococcosis in pigs, lesion development and serological follow up. , 2005, Veterinary parasitology.

[12]  M. O. Sato,et al.  DNA Differential Diagnosis of Taeniasis and Cysticercosis by Multiplex PCR , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[13]  C. Evans,et al.  Taenia solium cysticercosis. , 2000, Lancet.

[14]  R. López-Vélez,et al.  PCR tools for the differential diagnosis of Taenia saginata and Taenia solium taeniasis/cysticercosis from different geographical locations. , 2002, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[15]  Z. Świderski,et al.  Intraspecific variability among NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 sequences of Taenia hydatigena. , 2001, Parasitology international.

[16]  R. Parkhouse,et al.  Differential Diagnosis of Taenia saginata and Taenia solium Infection by PCR , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[17]  R. Gilman,et al.  Differentiating Taenia solium andTaenia saginata Infections by Simple Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining and PCR-Restriction Enzyme Analysis , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.